Seek Returns logo

ASML vs. GLW: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated

Here’s a clear look at ASML and GLW, comparing key factors like performance, valuation metrics, dividends, and financial strength. It’s built for investors or anyone curious to see how these two stocks match up.

Company Overview

ASML dominates in value with a market cap of 289.86 billion USD, eclipsing GLW’s 41.26 billion USD by roughly 7.02×.

With betas of 1.22 for ASML and 1.08 for GLW, both show similar volatility profiles relative to the overall market.

ASML trades as an ADR, giving U.S. investors a simple on-ramp to its foreign shares, while GLW remains a standard domestic listing.

SymbolASMLGLW
Company NameASML Holding N.V.Corning Incorporated
CountryNLUS
SectorTechnologyTechnology
IndustrySemiconductorsHardware, Equipment & Parts
CEOMr. Christophe D. FouquetMr. Wendell P. Weeks
Price737.17 USD48.18 USD
Market Cap289.86 billion USD41.26 billion USD
Beta1.221.08
ExchangeNASDAQNYSE
IPO DateMarch 15, 1995December 31, 1981
ADRYesNo

Performance Comparison

This chart compares the performance of ASML and GLW over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).

Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.

Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

Valuation Metrics Comparison

For a detailed comparison of valuation metrics between ASML and GLW, please refer to the table below.

SymbolASMLGLW
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM)29.3890.74
Forward PEG Ratio (TTM)1.807.59
Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM)8.343.04
Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM)14.613.84
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM)27.6038.46
EV-to-EBITDA (TTM)21.8220.56
EV-to-Sales (TTM)8.173.54
EV-to-Free Cash Flow (TTM)27.0244.79

Dividend Comparison

GLW stands out with a 2.32% dividend yield—around 137% above ASML’s 0.98%—highlighting its emphasis on generous payouts.

SymbolASMLGLW
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.98%2.32%

Financial Strength Metrics Comparison

This section dives into the financial resilience of ASML and GLW, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.

  • ASML shows “--” for interest coverage, hinting at negligible interest costs, whereas GLW (at 4.55) covers its interest obligations.
SymbolASMLGLW
Current Ratio (TTM)1.521.69
Quick Ratio (TTM)0.911.05
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM)0.210.76
Debt-to-Assets Ratio (TTM)0.080.30
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)--4.55