Seek Returns logo

ASML vs. GDS: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at ASML and GDS, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Overview

ASML’s market capitalization of 312.40 billion USD is substantially larger than GDS’s 140.20 billion USD, indicating a significant difference in their market valuations.

ASML’s beta of 1.22 points to significantly higher volatility compared to GDS (beta: 0.23), suggesting ASML has greater potential for both gains and losses relative to market movements.

ASML and GDS are both American Depositary Receipts (ADRs). This provides U.S. investors with straightforward access to investing in these foreign-listed companies without directly engaging with overseas stock exchanges.

SymbolASMLGDS
Company NameASML Holding N.V.GDS Holdings Limited
CountryNLCN
SectorTechnologyTechnology
IndustrySemiconductorsInformation Technology Services
CEOChristophe D. FouquetWei Huang
Price794.5 USD33.98 USD
Market Cap312.40 billion USD140.20 billion USD
Beta1.220.23
ExchangeNASDAQNASDAQ
IPO DateMarch 15, 1995November 2, 2016
ADRYesYes

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of ASML and GDS by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period.

Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

ASML vs. GDS: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Profitability

Return on Equity

ASML

52.08%

Semiconductors Industry

Max
41.84%
Q3
15.81%
Median
6.31%
Q1
-5.54%
Min
-30.12%

ASML’s Return on Equity of 52.08% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Semiconductors industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

GDS

16.65%

Information Technology Services Industry

Max
47.24%
Q3
23.27%
Median
12.85%
Q1
2.22%
Min
-26.63%

GDS’s Return on Equity of 16.65% is on par with the norm for the Information Technology Services industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

ASML vs. GDS: A comparison of their ROE against their respective Semiconductors and Information Technology Services industry benchmarks.

Return on Invested Capital

ASML

30.91%

Semiconductors Industry

Max
30.91%
Q3
11.34%
Median
4.08%
Q1
-2.17%
Min
-19.59%

In the upper quartile for the Semiconductors industry, ASML’s Return on Invested Capital of 30.91% signifies a highly effective use of its capital to generate profits when compared to its peers.

GDS

1.92%

Information Technology Services Industry

Max
28.29%
Q3
13.19%
Median
7.24%
Q1
0.23%
Min
-18.82%

GDS’s Return on Invested Capital of 1.92% is in line with the norm for the Information Technology Services industry, reflecting a standard level of efficiency in generating profits from its capital base.

ASML vs. GDS: A comparison of their ROIC against their respective Semiconductors and Information Technology Services industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin

ASML

28.33%

Semiconductors Industry

Max
51.69%
Q3
19.67%
Median
8.56%
Q1
-5.44%
Min
-38.60%

A Net Profit Margin of 28.33% places ASML in the upper quartile for the Semiconductors industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

GDS

30.83%

Information Technology Services Industry

Max
20.47%
Q3
11.62%
Median
5.97%
Q1
1.89%
Min
-4.62%

GDS’s Net Profit Margin of 30.83% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Information Technology Services industry. This demonstrates outstanding operational efficiency and a strong competitive advantage in converting revenue into profit.

ASML vs. GDS: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin against their respective Semiconductors and Information Technology Services industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin

ASML

33.76%

Semiconductors Industry

Max
58.03%
Q3
22.12%
Median
8.40%
Q1
-3.73%
Min
-36.14%

An Operating Profit Margin of 33.76% places ASML in the upper quartile for the Semiconductors industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

GDS

10.23%

Information Technology Services Industry

Max
29.42%
Q3
14.75%
Median
8.92%
Q1
2.62%
Min
-11.92%

GDS’s Operating Profit Margin of 10.23% is around the midpoint for the Information Technology Services industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

ASML vs. GDS: A comparison of their Operating Margin against their respective Semiconductors and Information Technology Services industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolASMLGDS
Return on Equity (TTM)52.08%16.65%
Return on Assets (TTM)19.14%4.65%
Return on Invested Capital (TTM)30.91%1.92%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)28.33%30.83%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)33.76%10.23%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)52.01%22.02%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio

ASML

1.52

Semiconductors Industry

Max
9.10
Q3
5.23
Median
3.09
Q1
2.49
Min
1.02

ASML’s Current Ratio of 1.52 falls into the lower quartile for the Semiconductors industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

GDS

1.28

Information Technology Services Industry

Max
3.41
Q3
2.37
Median
1.58
Q1
1.20
Min
0.00

GDS’s Current Ratio of 1.28 aligns with the median group of the Information Technology Services industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

ASML vs. GDS: A comparison of their Current Ratio against their respective Semiconductors and Information Technology Services industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio

ASML

0.21

Semiconductors Industry

Max
0.97
Q3
0.46
Median
0.21
Q1
0.05
Min
0.00

ASML’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.21 is typical for the Semiconductors industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

GDS

1.89

Information Technology Services Industry

Max
2.63
Q3
1.16
Median
0.48
Q1
0.09
Min
0.01

GDS’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Information Technology Services industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.89. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

ASML vs. GDS: A comparison of their D/E Ratio against their respective Semiconductors and Information Technology Services industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio

ASML

--

Semiconductors Industry

Max
36.25
Q3
29.12
Median
7.01
Q1
-1.22
Min
-18.18

Interest Coverage Ratio data for ASML is currently unavailable.

GDS

0.74

Information Technology Services Industry

Max
17.52
Q3
10.04
Median
4.66
Q1
0.80
Min
-10.50

GDS’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 0.74 is a critical concern. A value below 1.0 means operating earnings are insufficient to cover interest expenses, indicating severe financial strain and high default risk.

ASML vs. GDS: A comparison of their Interest Coverage against their respective Semiconductors and Information Technology Services industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolASMLGDS
Current Ratio (TTM)1.521.28
Quick Ratio (TTM)0.911.28
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM)0.211.89
Debt-to-Asset Ratio (TTM)0.080.60
Net Debt-to-EBITDA Ratio (TTM)-0.477.92
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)--0.74

Growth

The following charts compare key year-over-year (YoY) growth metrics for ASML and GDS. These metrics are based on the companies’ annual financial reports.

Revenue Growth

ASML vs. GDS: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Revenue Growth.

Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth

ASML vs. GDS: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth.

Free Cash Flow Growth

ASML vs. GDS: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Free Cash Flow Growth.

Dividend

Dividend Yield

ASML

0.85%

Semiconductors Industry

Max
6.48%
Q3
0.93%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

ASML’s Dividend Yield of 0.85% is consistent with its peers in the Semiconductors industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

GDS

0.00%

Information Technology Services Industry

Max
16.57%
Q3
1.39%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

GDS currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

ASML vs. GDS: A comparison of their Dividend Yield against their respective Semiconductors and Information Technology Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio

ASML

28.49%

Semiconductors Industry

Max
204.29%
Q3
31.85%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

ASML’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 28.49% is within the typical range for the Semiconductors industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

GDS

0.00%

Information Technology Services Industry

Max
112.81%
Q3
20.98%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

GDS has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

ASML vs. GDS: A comparison of their Payout Ratio against their respective Semiconductors and Information Technology Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolASMLGDS
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.85%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)28.49%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio

ASML

29.72

Semiconductors Industry

Max
86.15
Q3
47.38
Median
27.87
Q1
18.89
Min
4.73

ASML’s P/E Ratio of 29.72 is within the middle range for the Semiconductors industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

GDS

35.44

Information Technology Services Industry

Max
49.12
Q3
36.91
Median
24.84
Q1
15.88
Min
1.55

GDS’s P/E Ratio of 35.44 is within the middle range for the Information Technology Services industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

ASML vs. GDS: A comparison of their P/E Ratio against their respective Semiconductors and Information Technology Services industry benchmarks.

Forward P/E to Growth Ratio

ASML

1.90

Semiconductors Industry

Max
4.73
Q3
2.80
Median
1.11
Q1
0.68
Min
0.01

The Forward PEG Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric in the Semiconductors industry.

GDS

28.19

Information Technology Services Industry

Max
5.35
Q3
3.79
Median
2.23
Q1
1.19
Min
0.03

GDS’s Forward PEG Ratio of 28.19 is exceptionally high for the Information Technology Services industry. This suggests its stock price is very high relative to its expected earnings growth, signaling significant overvaluation risk.

ASML vs. GDS: A comparison of their Forward PEG Ratio against their respective Semiconductors and Information Technology Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio

ASML

8.44

Semiconductors Industry

Max
21.96
Q3
10.21
Median
4.45
Q1
2.32
Min
0.48

ASML’s P/S Ratio of 8.44 aligns with the market consensus for the Semiconductors industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

GDS

4.26

Information Technology Services Industry

Max
8.15
Q3
4.17
Median
2.14
Q1
1.00
Min
0.10

GDS’s P/S Ratio of 4.26 is in the upper echelon for the Information Technology Services industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

ASML vs. GDS: A comparison of their P/S Ratio against their respective Semiconductors and Information Technology Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio

ASML

14.78

Semiconductors Industry

Max
13.12
Q3
6.49
Median
3.31
Q1
1.74
Min
0.23

At 14.78, ASML’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Semiconductors industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

GDS

5.16

Information Technology Services Industry

Max
11.78
Q3
6.14
Median
3.23
Q1
1.97
Min
0.42

The P/B Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric for the Information Technology Services industry.

ASML vs. GDS: A comparison of their P/B Ratio against their respective Semiconductors and Information Technology Services industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolASMLGDS
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM)29.7235.44
Forward PEG Ratio (TTM)1.9028.19
Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM)8.444.26
Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM)14.785.16
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM)27.93-9.58
EV-to-EBITDA (TTM)22.0918.16
EV-to-Sales (TTM)8.277.55