Seek Returns logo

ASML vs. FLEX: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at ASML and FLEX, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Overview

ASML’s market capitalization of 312.40 billion USD is substantially larger than FLEX’s 19.30 billion USD, indicating a significant difference in their market valuations.

With betas of 1.22 for ASML and 1.03 for FLEX, both stocks show similar sensitivity to overall market movements.

ASML trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors a convenient way to access its foreign-listed shares. In contrast, FLEX is a standard domestic listing.

SymbolASMLFLEX
Company NameASML Holding N.V.Flex Ltd.
CountryNLSG
SectorTechnologyTechnology
IndustrySemiconductorsHardware, Equipment & Parts
CEOChristophe D. FouquetRevathi Advaithi
Price794.5 USD51.69 USD
Market Cap312.40 billion USD19.30 billion USD
Beta1.221.03
ExchangeNASDAQNASDAQ
IPO DateMarch 15, 1995March 18, 1994
ADRYesNo

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of ASML and FLEX by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period.

Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

ASML vs. FLEX: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Profitability

Return on Equity

ASML

52.08%

Semiconductors Industry

Max
41.84%
Q3
15.81%
Median
6.31%
Q1
-5.54%
Min
-30.12%

ASML’s Return on Equity of 52.08% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Semiconductors industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

FLEX

16.77%

Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry

Max
38.64%
Q3
17.03%
Median
8.95%
Q1
1.23%
Min
-14.34%

FLEX’s Return on Equity of 16.77% is on par with the norm for the Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

ASML vs. FLEX: A comparison of their ROE against their respective Semiconductors and Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry benchmarks.

Return on Invested Capital

ASML

30.91%

Semiconductors Industry

Max
30.91%
Q3
11.34%
Median
4.08%
Q1
-2.17%
Min
-19.59%

In the upper quartile for the Semiconductors industry, ASML’s Return on Invested Capital of 30.91% signifies a highly effective use of its capital to generate profits when compared to its peers.

FLEX

9.83%

Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry

Max
17.24%
Q3
9.87%
Median
6.54%
Q1
1.56%
Min
-7.50%

FLEX’s Return on Invested Capital of 9.83% is in line with the norm for the Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry, reflecting a standard level of efficiency in generating profits from its capital base.

ASML vs. FLEX: A comparison of their ROIC against their respective Semiconductors and Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin

ASML

28.33%

Semiconductors Industry

Max
51.69%
Q3
19.67%
Median
8.56%
Q1
-5.44%
Min
-38.60%

A Net Profit Margin of 28.33% places ASML in the upper quartile for the Semiconductors industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

FLEX

3.25%

Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry

Max
22.76%
Q3
11.04%
Median
3.80%
Q1
1.13%
Min
-8.57%

FLEX’s Net Profit Margin of 3.25% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

ASML vs. FLEX: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin against their respective Semiconductors and Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin

ASML

33.76%

Semiconductors Industry

Max
58.03%
Q3
22.12%
Median
8.40%
Q1
-3.73%
Min
-36.14%

An Operating Profit Margin of 33.76% places ASML in the upper quartile for the Semiconductors industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

FLEX

4.53%

Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry

Max
25.25%
Q3
13.73%
Median
8.22%
Q1
4.35%
Min
-0.79%

FLEX’s Operating Profit Margin of 4.53% is around the midpoint for the Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

ASML vs. FLEX: A comparison of their Operating Margin against their respective Semiconductors and Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolASMLFLEX
Return on Equity (TTM)52.08%16.77%
Return on Assets (TTM)19.14%4.56%
Return on Invested Capital (TTM)30.91%9.83%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)28.33%3.25%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)33.76%4.53%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)52.01%8.36%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio

ASML

1.52

Semiconductors Industry

Max
9.10
Q3
5.23
Median
3.09
Q1
2.49
Min
1.02

ASML’s Current Ratio of 1.52 falls into the lower quartile for the Semiconductors industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

FLEX

1.30

Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry

Max
4.10
Q3
3.23
Median
2.37
Q1
1.81
Min
0.58

FLEX’s Current Ratio of 1.30 falls into the lower quartile for the Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

ASML vs. FLEX: A comparison of their Current Ratio against their respective Semiconductors and Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio

ASML

0.21

Semiconductors Industry

Max
0.97
Q3
0.46
Median
0.21
Q1
0.05
Min
0.00

ASML’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.21 is typical for the Semiconductors industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

FLEX

0.33

Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry

Max
1.19
Q3
0.56
Median
0.33
Q1
0.11
Min
0.00

FLEX’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.33 is typical for the Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

ASML vs. FLEX: A comparison of their D/E Ratio against their respective Semiconductors and Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio

ASML

--

Semiconductors Industry

Max
36.25
Q3
29.12
Median
7.01
Q1
-1.22
Min
-18.18

Interest Coverage Ratio data for ASML is currently unavailable.

FLEX

5.36

Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry

Max
28.37
Q3
14.25
Median
9.35
Q1
2.86
Min
-13.16

FLEX’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 5.36 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

ASML vs. FLEX: A comparison of their Interest Coverage against their respective Semiconductors and Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolASMLFLEX
Current Ratio (TTM)1.521.30
Quick Ratio (TTM)0.910.79
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM)0.210.33
Debt-to-Asset Ratio (TTM)0.080.09
Net Debt-to-EBITDA Ratio (TTM)-0.47-0.39
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)--5.36

Growth

The following charts compare key year-over-year (YoY) growth metrics for ASML and FLEX. These metrics are based on the companies’ annual financial reports.

Revenue Growth

ASML vs. FLEX: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Revenue Growth.

Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth

ASML vs. FLEX: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth.

Free Cash Flow Growth

ASML vs. FLEX: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Free Cash Flow Growth.

Dividend

Dividend Yield

ASML

0.85%

Semiconductors Industry

Max
6.48%
Q3
0.93%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

ASML’s Dividend Yield of 0.85% is consistent with its peers in the Semiconductors industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

FLEX

0.00%

Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry

Max
2.16%
Q3
0.66%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

FLEX currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

ASML vs. FLEX: A comparison of their Dividend Yield against their respective Semiconductors and Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio

ASML

28.49%

Semiconductors Industry

Max
204.29%
Q3
31.85%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

ASML’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 28.49% is within the typical range for the Semiconductors industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

FLEX

0.00%

Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry

Max
71.55%
Q3
25.37%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

FLEX has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

ASML vs. FLEX: A comparison of their Payout Ratio against their respective Semiconductors and Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolASMLFLEX
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.85%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)28.49%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio

ASML

29.72

Semiconductors Industry

Max
86.15
Q3
47.38
Median
27.87
Q1
18.89
Min
4.73

ASML’s P/E Ratio of 29.72 is within the middle range for the Semiconductors industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

FLEX

23.99

Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry

Max
86.58
Q3
53.54
Median
36.07
Q1
25.99
Min
12.16

In the lower quartile for the Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry, FLEX’s P/E Ratio of 23.99 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

ASML vs. FLEX: A comparison of their P/E Ratio against their respective Semiconductors and Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry benchmarks.

Forward P/E to Growth Ratio

ASML

1.90

Semiconductors Industry

Max
4.73
Q3
2.80
Median
1.11
Q1
0.68
Min
0.01

The Forward PEG Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric in the Semiconductors industry.

FLEX

2.77

Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry

Max
5.22
Q3
3.27
Median
2.16
Q1
1.77
Min
0.00

The Forward PEG Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric in the Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry.

ASML vs. FLEX: A comparison of their Forward PEG Ratio against their respective Semiconductors and Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio

ASML

8.44

Semiconductors Industry

Max
21.96
Q3
10.21
Median
4.45
Q1
2.32
Min
0.48

ASML’s P/S Ratio of 8.44 aligns with the market consensus for the Semiconductors industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

FLEX

0.75

Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry

Max
8.50
Q3
4.95
Median
2.45
Q1
1.17
Min
0.32

In the lower quartile for the Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry, FLEX’s P/S Ratio of 0.75 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

ASML vs. FLEX: A comparison of their P/S Ratio against their respective Semiconductors and Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio

ASML

14.78

Semiconductors Industry

Max
13.12
Q3
6.49
Median
3.31
Q1
1.74
Min
0.23

At 14.78, ASML’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Semiconductors industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

FLEX

4.02

Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry

Max
7.53
Q3
4.63
Median
3.34
Q1
2.35
Min
0.48

FLEX’s P/B Ratio of 4.02 is within the conventional range for the Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

ASML vs. FLEX: A comparison of their P/B Ratio against their respective Semiconductors and Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolASMLFLEX
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM)29.7223.99
Forward PEG Ratio (TTM)1.902.77
Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM)8.440.75
Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM)14.784.02
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM)27.9318.09
EV-to-EBITDA (TTM)22.0911.56
EV-to-Sales (TTM)8.270.72