ASML vs. DDOG: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
UpdatedHere’s a clear look at ASML and DDOG, comparing key factors like performance, valuation metrics, dividends, and financial strength. It’s built for investors or anyone curious to see how these two stocks match up.
Company Overview
ASML dwarfs DDOG in market cap, clocking in at 289.86 billion USD—about 7.38 times the 39.26 billion USD of its counterpart.
ASML at 1.22 and DDOG at 1.12 move in sync when it comes to market volatility.
Worth noting: ASML flies the ADR flag, tying it to a foreign outfit on U.S. soil, while DDOG sticks to plain-vanilla U.S. listing.
Symbol | ASML | DDOG |
---|---|---|
Company Name | ASML Holding N.V. | Datadog, Inc. |
Country | NL | US |
Sector | Technology | Technology |
Industry | Semiconductors | Software - Application |
CEO | Mr. Christophe D. Fouquet | Mr. Olivier Pomel |
Price | 737.17 USD | 113.69 USD |
Market Cap | 289.86 billion USD | 39.26 billion USD |
Beta | 1.221 | 1.116 |
Exchange | NASDAQ | NASDAQ |
IPO Date | March 15, 1995 | September 19, 2019 |
ADR | Yes | No |
Performance Comparison
This chart compares the performance of ASML and DDOG over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).
Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.
Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Valuation Metrics Comparison
The section examines key financial ratios to assess the valuation of ASML and DDOG based on earnings, cash flow, sales, and book value. Pay attention to the following notable points where extreme values stand out.
- DDOG has a notably high P/E of 235.32, where its market price commands a steep multiple of its earnings from the past year—indicating investors are pricing in significant future potential. On the flip side, ASML at 29.41 maintains a P/E within a more standard range, tied closer to its current profitability.
Symbol | ASML | DDOG |
---|---|---|
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM) | 29.41 | 235.32 |
Forward PEG Ratio (TTM) | 1.80 | 17.92 |
Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM) | 8.35 | 13.85 |
Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM) | 14.62 | 13.37 |
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM) | 27.63 | 43.94 |
EV-to-EBITDA (TTM) | 21.85 | 253.27 |
EV-to-Sales (TTM) | 8.18 | 14.13 |
EV-to-Free Cash Flow (TTM) | 27.05 | 44.83 |
Dividend Comparison
ASML’s 0.98% yield offers steady income while retaining earnings for growth, unlike DDOG, which pays none, reinvesting fully—likely in expansion or R&D—for investors eyeing future gains. This pits ASML’s balanced approach against DDOG’s long-term focus.
Symbol | ASML | DDOG |
---|---|---|
Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.98% | 0.00% |
Financial Strength Metrics Comparison
This section dives into the financial resilience of ASML and DDOG, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.
- ASML posts an interest coverage of “--”, hinting at interest costs so low they’re negligible—often from scant debt or dirt-cheap rates—while DDOG at 5.95 handles interest with solid earnings.
Symbol | ASML | DDOG |
---|---|---|
Current Ratio (TTM) | 1.52 | 2.74 |
Quick Ratio (TTM) | 0.91 | 2.74 |
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM) | 0.21 | 0.64 |
Debt-to-Assets Ratio (TTM) | 0.08 | 0.31 |
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | -- | 5.95 |