ASML vs. CRM: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
UpdatedHere’s a clear look at ASML and CRM, comparing key factors like performance, valuation metrics, dividends, and financial strength. It’s built for investors or anyone curious to see how these two stocks match up.
Company Overview
ASML (289.86 billion USD) and CRM (270.84 billion USD) sit neck-and-neck in market cap terms.
ASML at 1.22 and CRM at 1.42 move in sync when it comes to market volatility.
Worth noting: ASML flies the ADR flag, tying it to a foreign outfit on U.S. soil, while CRM sticks to plain-vanilla U.S. listing.
Symbol | ASML | CRM |
---|---|---|
Company Name | ASML Holding N.V. | Salesforce, Inc. |
Country | NL | US |
Sector | Technology | Technology |
Industry | Semiconductors | Software - Application |
CEO | Mr. Christophe D. Fouquet | Mr. Marc R. Benioff |
Price | 737.17 USD | 282.28 USD |
Market Cap | 289.86 billion USD | 270.84 billion USD |
Beta | 1.221 | 1.421 |
Exchange | NASDAQ | NYSE |
IPO Date | March 15, 1995 | June 23, 2004 |
ADR | Yes | No |
Performance Comparison
This chart compares the performance of ASML and CRM over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).
Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.
Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Valuation Metrics Comparison
For a detailed comparison of valuation metrics between ASML and CRM, please refer to the table below.
Symbol | ASML | CRM |
---|---|---|
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM) | 29.33 | 43.68 |
Forward PEG Ratio (TTM) | 1.80 | 3.85 |
Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM) | 8.33 | 7.15 |
Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM) | 14.58 | 4.43 |
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM) | 27.56 | 21.78 |
EV-to-EBITDA (TTM) | 21.78 | 33.74 |
EV-to-Sales (TTM) | 8.15 | 7.21 |
EV-to-Free Cash Flow (TTM) | 26.97 | 21.99 |
Dividend Comparison
Both ASML at 0.98% and CRM at 0.57% pay dividends, blending income with growth in their strategies. Yet ASML’s 0.98% yield, 72% above CRM’s 0.57%, suggests a focus on generous payouts—possibly from stronger profits—while CRM leans toward reinvestment, perhaps due to tighter margins.
Symbol | ASML | CRM |
---|---|---|
Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.98% | 0.57% |
Financial Strength Metrics Comparison
This section dives into the financial resilience of ASML and CRM, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.
- For ASML and CRM, interest coverage shows as “--”, pointing to negligible interest costs—often a sign of slim debt or rock-bottom rates keeping expenses near zero.
Symbol | ASML | CRM |
---|---|---|
Current Ratio (TTM) | 1.52 | 1.06 |
Quick Ratio (TTM) | 0.91 | 1.06 |
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM) | 0.21 | 0.19 |
Debt-to-Assets Ratio (TTM) | 0.08 | 0.11 |
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | -- | -- |