ASML vs. COHR: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
UpdatedHere’s a clear look at ASML and COHR, comparing key factors like performance, valuation metrics, dividends, and financial strength. It’s built for investors or anyone curious to see how these two stocks match up.
Company Overview
ASML dominates in value with a market cap of 289.86 billion USD, eclipsing COHR’s 12.33 billion USD by roughly 23.51×.
COHR carries a higher beta at 1.91, indicating it’s more sensitive to market moves, while ASML remains steadier at 1.22.
ASML trades as an ADR, giving U.S. investors a simple on-ramp to its foreign shares, while COHR remains a standard domestic listing.
| Symbol | ASML | COHR |
|---|---|---|
| Company Name | ASML Holding N.V. | Coherent, Inc. |
| Country | NL | US |
| Sector | Technology | Technology |
| Industry | Semiconductors | Hardware, Equipment & Parts |
| CEO | Mr. Christophe D. Fouquet | Mr. James Robert Anderson |
| Price | 737.17 USD | 79.56 USD |
| Market Cap | 289.86 billion USD | 12.33 billion USD |
| Beta | 1.22 | 1.91 |
| Exchange | NASDAQ | NASDAQ |
| IPO Date | March 15, 1995 | October 2, 1987 |
| ADR | Yes | No |
Performance Comparison
This chart compares the performance of ASML and COHR over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).
Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.
Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Valuation Metrics Comparison
The section examines key financial ratios to assess the valuation of ASML and COHR based on earnings, cash flow, sales, and book value. Pay attention to the following notable points where extreme values stand out.
- COHR features a high P/E of 189.26, indicating strong growth expectations, compared to ASML at 29.38, which trades at a more standard valuation based on its current earnings.
| Symbol | ASML | COHR |
|---|---|---|
| Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM) | 29.38 | 189.26 |
| Forward PEG Ratio (TTM) | 1.80 | 43.66 |
| Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM) | 8.34 | 2.20 |
| Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM) | 14.61 | 1.58 |
| Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM) | 27.60 | 48.11 |
| EV-to-EBITDA (TTM) | 21.82 | 17.31 |
| EV-to-Sales (TTM) | 8.17 | 2.75 |
| EV-to-Free Cash Flow (TTM) | 27.02 | 60.03 |
Dividend Comparison
ASML delivers a 0.98% dividend yield, blending income with growth, whereas COHR appears to retain its profits, possibly to fund operations, R&D, or other growth initiatives.
| Symbol | ASML | COHR |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.98% | 0.00% |
Financial Strength Metrics Comparison
This section dives into the financial resilience of ASML and COHR, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.
- ASML shows “--” for interest coverage, hinting at negligible interest costs, whereas COHR (at 1.82) covers its interest obligations.
| Symbol | ASML | COHR |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (TTM) | 1.52 | 2.47 |
| Quick Ratio (TTM) | 0.91 | 1.54 |
| Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM) | 0.21 | 0.50 |
| Debt-to-Assets Ratio (TTM) | 0.08 | 0.27 |
| Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | -- | 1.82 |