ASML vs. CLS: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
UpdatedHere’s a clear look at ASML and CLS, comparing key factors like performance, valuation metrics, dividends, and financial strength. It’s built for investors or anyone curious to see how these two stocks match up.
Company Overview
ASML dwarfs CLS in market cap, clocking in at 289.86 billion USD—about 22.11 times the 13.11 billion USD of its counterpart.
ASML at 1.22 and CLS at 1.50 move in sync when it comes to market volatility.
Worth noting: ASML flies the ADR flag, tying it to a foreign outfit on U.S. soil, while CLS sticks to plain-vanilla U.S. listing.
| Symbol | ASML | CLS |
|---|---|---|
| Company Name | ASML Holding N.V. | Celestica Inc. |
| Country | NL | CA |
| Sector | Technology | Technology |
| Industry | Semiconductors | Hardware, Equipment & Parts |
| CEO | Mr. Christophe D. Fouquet | Mr. Robert Andrew Mionis |
| Price | 737.17 USD | 114.03 USD |
| Market Cap | 289.86 billion USD | 13.11 billion USD |
| Beta | 1.221 | 1.502 |
| Exchange | NASDAQ | NYSE |
| IPO Date | March 15, 1995 | June 30, 1998 |
| ADR | Yes | No |
Performance Comparison
This chart compares the performance of ASML and CLS over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).
Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.
Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Valuation Metrics Comparison
For a detailed comparison of valuation metrics between ASML and CLS, please refer to the table below.
| Symbol | ASML | CLS |
|---|---|---|
| Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM) | 29.41 | 32.04 |
| Forward PEG Ratio (TTM) | 1.80 | 1.64 |
| Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM) | 8.35 | 1.30 |
| Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM) | 14.62 | 8.49 |
| Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM) | 27.63 | 37.19 |
| EV-to-EBITDA (TTM) | 21.85 | 18.97 |
| EV-to-Sales (TTM) | 8.18 | 1.36 |
| EV-to-Free Cash Flow (TTM) | 27.05 | 39.00 |
Dividend Comparison
ASML’s 0.98% yield offers steady income while retaining earnings for growth, unlike CLS, which pays none, reinvesting fully—likely in expansion or R&D—for investors eyeing future gains. This pits ASML’s balanced approach against CLS’s long-term focus.
| Symbol | ASML | CLS |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.98% | 0.00% |
Financial Strength Metrics Comparison
This section dives into the financial resilience of ASML and CLS, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.
- ASML posts an interest coverage of “--”, hinting at interest costs so low they’re negligible—often from scant debt or dirt-cheap rates—while CLS at 12.39 handles interest with solid earnings.
| Symbol | ASML | CLS |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (TTM) | 1.52 | 1.43 |
| Quick Ratio (TTM) | 0.91 | 0.85 |
| Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM) | 0.21 | 0.60 |
| Debt-to-Assets Ratio (TTM) | 0.08 | 0.16 |
| Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | -- | 12.39 |