ASML vs. CFLT: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
UpdatedHere’s a clear look at ASML and CFLT, comparing key factors like performance, valuation metrics, dividends, and financial strength. It’s built for investors or anyone curious to see how these two stocks match up.
Company Overview
ASML dwarfs CFLT in market cap, clocking in at 289.86 billion USD—about 40.45 times the 7.17 billion USD of its counterpart.
ASML at 1.22 and CFLT at 1.02 move in sync when it comes to market volatility.
Worth noting: ASML flies the ADR flag, tying it to a foreign outfit on U.S. soil, while CFLT sticks to plain-vanilla U.S. listing.
| Symbol | ASML | CFLT |
|---|---|---|
| Company Name | ASML Holding N.V. | Confluent, Inc. |
| Country | NL | US |
| Sector | Technology | Technology |
| Industry | Semiconductors | Software - Infrastructure |
| CEO | Mr. Christophe D. Fouquet | Mr. Edward Kreps |
| Price | 737.17 USD | 21.05 USD |
| Market Cap | 289.86 billion USD | 7.17 billion USD |
| Beta | 1.221 | 1.025 |
| Exchange | NASDAQ | NASDAQ |
| IPO Date | March 15, 1995 | June 24, 2021 |
| ADR | Yes | No |
Performance Comparison
This chart compares the performance of ASML and CFLT over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).
Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.
Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Valuation Metrics Comparison
The section examines key financial ratios to assess the valuation of ASML and CFLT based on earnings, cash flow, sales, and book value. Pay attention to the following notable points where extreme values stand out.
- CFLT shows a negative P/E of -22.11, highlighting a year of losses with no net profit generated. Meanwhile, ASML at 29.41 has sustained positive earnings, offering a more stable earnings foundation.
- CFLT has a negative Forward PEG of -0.66, suggesting analysts predict either a drop in earnings or no profits at all in the near future—a red flag for its growth trajectory. Meanwhile, ASML at 1.80 avoids such a pessimistic forecast.
| Symbol | ASML | CFLT |
|---|---|---|
| Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM) | 29.41 | -22.11 |
| Forward PEG Ratio (TTM) | 1.80 | -0.66 |
| Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM) | 8.35 | 7.04 |
| Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM) | 14.62 | 6.89 |
| Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM) | 27.63 | 551.81 |
| EV-to-EBITDA (TTM) | 21.85 | -20.64 |
| EV-to-Sales (TTM) | 8.18 | 7.86 |
| EV-to-Free Cash Flow (TTM) | 27.05 | 615.75 |
Dividend Comparison
ASML’s 0.98% yield offers steady income while retaining earnings for growth, unlike CFLT, which pays none, reinvesting fully—likely in expansion or R&D—for investors eyeing future gains. This pits ASML’s balanced approach against CFLT’s long-term focus.
| Symbol | ASML | CFLT |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.98% | 0.00% |
Financial Strength Metrics Comparison
This section dives into the financial resilience of ASML and CFLT, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.
- For ASML and CFLT, interest coverage shows as “--”, pointing to negligible interest costs—often a sign of slim debt or rock-bottom rates keeping expenses near zero.
| Symbol | ASML | CFLT |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (TTM) | 1.52 | 4.42 |
| Quick Ratio (TTM) | 0.91 | 4.42 |
| Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM) | 0.21 | 1.08 |
| Debt-to-Assets Ratio (TTM) | 0.08 | 0.41 |
| Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | -- | -- |