Seek Returns logo

ASML vs. CFLT: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at ASML and CFLT, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Overview

ASML’s market capitalization of 312.40 billion USD is substantially larger than CFLT’s 8.95 billion USD, indicating a significant difference in their market valuations.

With betas of 1.22 for ASML and 0.98 for CFLT, both stocks show similar sensitivity to overall market movements.

ASML trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors a convenient way to access its foreign-listed shares. In contrast, CFLT is a standard domestic listing.

SymbolASMLCFLT
Company NameASML Holding N.V.Confluent, Inc.
CountryNLUS
SectorTechnologyTechnology
IndustrySemiconductorsSoftware - Infrastructure
CEOChristophe D. FouquetEdward Kreps
Price794.5 USD26.3 USD
Market Cap312.40 billion USD8.95 billion USD
Beta1.220.98
ExchangeNASDAQNASDAQ
IPO DateMarch 15, 1995June 24, 2021
ADRYesNo

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of ASML and CFLT by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period.

Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

ASML vs. CFLT: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Profitability

Return on Equity

ASML

52.08%

Semiconductors Industry

Max
41.84%
Q3
15.81%
Median
6.31%
Q1
-5.54%
Min
-30.12%

ASML’s Return on Equity of 52.08% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Semiconductors industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

CFLT

-33.70%

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
80.61%
Q3
29.97%
Median
2.84%
Q1
-8.35%
Min
-56.26%

CFLT has a negative Return on Equity of -33.70%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

ASML vs. CFLT: A comparison of their ROE against their respective Semiconductors and Software - Infrastructure industry benchmarks.

Return on Invested Capital

ASML

30.91%

Semiconductors Industry

Max
30.91%
Q3
11.34%
Median
4.08%
Q1
-2.17%
Min
-19.59%

In the upper quartile for the Semiconductors industry, ASML’s Return on Invested Capital of 30.91% signifies a highly effective use of its capital to generate profits when compared to its peers.

CFLT

-18.54%

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
39.31%
Q3
11.97%
Median
1.67%
Q1
-7.10%
Min
-34.29%

CFLT has a negative Return on Invested Capital of -18.54%. This indicates that its operations are failing to generate a profit on the total capital invested, signaling significant inefficiency or value destruction.

ASML vs. CFLT: A comparison of their ROIC against their respective Semiconductors and Software - Infrastructure industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin

ASML

28.33%

Semiconductors Industry

Max
51.69%
Q3
19.67%
Median
8.56%
Q1
-5.44%
Min
-38.60%

A Net Profit Margin of 28.33% places ASML in the upper quartile for the Semiconductors industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

CFLT

-31.42%

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
46.46%
Q3
14.65%
Median
2.66%
Q1
-7.70%
Min
-35.45%

CFLT has a negative Net Profit Margin of -31.42%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

ASML vs. CFLT: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin against their respective Semiconductors and Software - Infrastructure industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin

ASML

33.76%

Semiconductors Industry

Max
58.03%
Q3
22.12%
Median
8.40%
Q1
-3.73%
Min
-36.14%

An Operating Profit Margin of 33.76% places ASML in the upper quartile for the Semiconductors industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

CFLT

-40.18%

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
48.51%
Q3
16.56%
Median
4.48%
Q1
-6.43%
Min
-40.18%

CFLT has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -40.18%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

ASML vs. CFLT: A comparison of their Operating Margin against their respective Semiconductors and Software - Infrastructure industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolASMLCFLT
Return on Equity (TTM)52.08%-33.70%
Return on Assets (TTM)19.14%-11.85%
Return on Invested Capital (TTM)30.91%-18.54%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)28.33%-31.42%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)33.76%-40.18%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)52.01%73.92%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio

ASML

1.52

Semiconductors Industry

Max
9.10
Q3
5.23
Median
3.09
Q1
2.49
Min
1.02

ASML’s Current Ratio of 1.52 falls into the lower quartile for the Semiconductors industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

CFLT

4.42

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
3.80
Q3
2.25
Median
1.51
Q1
1.10
Min
0.23

CFLT’s Current Ratio of 4.42 is exceptionally high, placing it well outside the typical range for the Software - Infrastructure industry. This indicates a very strong liquidity position, though such a high ratio may also suggest that the company is not using its assets efficiently to generate profits.

ASML vs. CFLT: A comparison of their Current Ratio against their respective Semiconductors and Software - Infrastructure industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio

ASML

0.21

Semiconductors Industry

Max
0.97
Q3
0.46
Median
0.21
Q1
0.05
Min
0.00

ASML’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.21 is typical for the Semiconductors industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

CFLT

1.08

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
2.56
Q3
1.12
Median
0.33
Q1
0.05
Min
0.00

CFLT’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.08 is typical for the Software - Infrastructure industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

ASML vs. CFLT: A comparison of their D/E Ratio against their respective Semiconductors and Software - Infrastructure industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio

ASML

--

Semiconductors Industry

Max
36.25
Q3
29.12
Median
7.01
Q1
-1.22
Min
-18.18

Interest Coverage Ratio data for ASML is currently unavailable.

CFLT

--

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
32.21
Q3
5.24
Median
0.95
Q1
-17.99
Min
-50.82

Interest Coverage Ratio data for CFLT is currently unavailable.

ASML vs. CFLT: A comparison of their Interest Coverage against their respective Semiconductors and Software - Infrastructure industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolASMLCFLT
Current Ratio (TTM)1.524.42
Quick Ratio (TTM)0.914.42
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM)0.211.08
Debt-to-Asset Ratio (TTM)0.080.41
Net Debt-to-EBITDA Ratio (TTM)-0.47-2.14
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)----

Growth

The following charts compare key year-over-year (YoY) growth metrics for ASML and CFLT. These metrics are based on the companies’ annual financial reports.

Revenue Growth

ASML vs. CFLT: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Revenue Growth.

Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth

ASML vs. CFLT: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth.

Free Cash Flow Growth

ASML vs. CFLT: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Free Cash Flow Growth.

Dividend

Dividend Yield

ASML

0.85%

Semiconductors Industry

Max
6.48%
Q3
0.93%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

ASML’s Dividend Yield of 0.85% is consistent with its peers in the Semiconductors industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

CFLT

0.00%

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
4.07%
Q3
0.00%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

CFLT currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

ASML vs. CFLT: A comparison of their Dividend Yield against their respective Semiconductors and Software - Infrastructure industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio

ASML

28.49%

Semiconductors Industry

Max
204.29%
Q3
31.85%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

ASML’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 28.49% is within the typical range for the Semiconductors industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

CFLT

0.00%

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
48.68%
Q3
0.00%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

CFLT has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

ASML vs. CFLT: A comparison of their Payout Ratio against their respective Semiconductors and Software - Infrastructure industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolASMLCFLT
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.85%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)28.49%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio

ASML

29.72

Semiconductors Industry

Max
86.15
Q3
47.38
Median
27.87
Q1
18.89
Min
4.73

ASML’s P/E Ratio of 29.72 is within the middle range for the Semiconductors industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

CFLT

-27.62

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
107.77
Q3
54.40
Median
28.10
Q1
18.03
Min
5.32

CFLT has a negative P/E Ratio of -27.62. This occurs when a company has negative earnings (a net loss), making the ratio unsuitable for valuation analysis.

ASML vs. CFLT: A comparison of their P/E Ratio against their respective Semiconductors and Software - Infrastructure industry benchmarks.

Forward P/E to Growth Ratio

ASML

1.90

Semiconductors Industry

Max
4.73
Q3
2.80
Median
1.11
Q1
0.68
Min
0.01

The Forward PEG Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric in the Semiconductors industry.

CFLT

-0.83

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
8.12
Q3
3.94
Median
2.13
Q1
0.94
Min
0.01

CFLT has a negative Forward PEG Ratio of -0.83. This typically results from negative earnings or forecasts of declining future earnings, making the ratio not meaningful for valuation.

ASML vs. CFLT: A comparison of their Forward PEG Ratio against their respective Semiconductors and Software - Infrastructure industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio

ASML

8.44

Semiconductors Industry

Max
21.96
Q3
10.21
Median
4.45
Q1
2.32
Min
0.48

ASML’s P/S Ratio of 8.44 aligns with the market consensus for the Semiconductors industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

CFLT

8.80

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
18.25
Q3
9.05
Median
4.77
Q1
2.30
Min
0.11

CFLT’s P/S Ratio of 8.80 aligns with the market consensus for the Software - Infrastructure industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

ASML vs. CFLT: A comparison of their P/S Ratio against their respective Semiconductors and Software - Infrastructure industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio

ASML

14.78

Semiconductors Industry

Max
13.12
Q3
6.49
Median
3.31
Q1
1.74
Min
0.23

At 14.78, ASML’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Semiconductors industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

CFLT

8.61

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
19.94
Q3
10.91
Median
6.33
Q1
2.95
Min
0.51

The P/B Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric for the Software - Infrastructure industry.

ASML vs. CFLT: A comparison of their P/B Ratio against their respective Semiconductors and Software - Infrastructure industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolASMLCFLT
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM)29.72-27.62
Forward PEG Ratio (TTM)1.90-0.83
Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM)8.448.80
Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM)14.788.61
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM)27.93689.43
EV-to-EBITDA (TTM)22.09-25.25
EV-to-Sales (TTM)8.279.61