ASML vs. CDNS: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
UpdatedHere’s a clear look at ASML and CDNS, comparing key factors like performance, valuation metrics, dividends, and financial strength. It’s built for investors or anyone curious to see how these two stocks match up.
Company Overview
ASML dwarfs CDNS in market cap, clocking in at 289.86 billion USD—about 3.34 times the 86.70 billion USD of its counterpart.
ASML at 1.22 and CDNS at 1.04 move in sync when it comes to market volatility.
Worth noting: ASML flies the ADR flag, tying it to a foreign outfit on U.S. soil, while CDNS sticks to plain-vanilla U.S. listing.
| Symbol | ASML | CDNS |
|---|---|---|
| Company Name | ASML Holding N.V. | Cadence Design Systems, Inc. |
| Country | NL | US |
| Sector | Technology | Technology |
| Industry | Semiconductors | Software - Application |
| CEO | Mr. Christophe D. Fouquet | Dr. Anirudh Devgan Ph.D. |
| Price | 737.17 USD | 317.55 USD |
| Market Cap | 289.86 billion USD | 86.70 billion USD |
| Beta | 1.221 | 1.045 |
| Exchange | NASDAQ | NASDAQ |
| IPO Date | March 15, 1995 | June 10, 1987 |
| ADR | Yes | No |
Performance Comparison
This chart compares the performance of ASML and CDNS over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).
Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.
Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Valuation Metrics Comparison
For a detailed comparison of valuation metrics between ASML and CDNS, please refer to the table below.
| Symbol | ASML | CDNS |
|---|---|---|
| Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM) | 29.41 | 79.86 |
| Forward PEG Ratio (TTM) | 1.80 | 11.04 |
| Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM) | 8.35 | 17.79 |
| Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM) | 14.62 | 18.08 |
| Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM) | 27.63 | 62.91 |
| EV-to-EBITDA (TTM) | 21.85 | 52.69 |
| EV-to-Sales (TTM) | 8.18 | 17.73 |
| EV-to-Free Cash Flow (TTM) | 27.05 | 62.69 |
Dividend Comparison
ASML’s 0.98% yield offers steady income while retaining earnings for growth, unlike CDNS, which pays none, reinvesting fully—likely in expansion or R&D—for investors eyeing future gains. This pits ASML’s balanced approach against CDNS’s long-term focus.
| Symbol | ASML | CDNS |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.98% | 0.00% |
Financial Strength Metrics Comparison
This section dives into the financial resilience of ASML and CDNS, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.
- ASML posts an interest coverage of “--”, hinting at interest costs so low they’re negligible—often from scant debt or dirt-cheap rates—while CDNS at 21.78 handles interest with solid earnings.
| Symbol | ASML | CDNS |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (TTM) | 1.52 | 3.07 |
| Quick Ratio (TTM) | 0.91 | 2.90 |
| Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM) | 0.21 | 0.52 |
| Debt-to-Assets Ratio (TTM) | 0.08 | 0.27 |
| Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | -- | 21.78 |