AS vs. TPR: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on July 8, 2025

Here’s a clear look at AS and TPR, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Overview

AS’s market capitalization stands at 21.53 billion USD, while TPR’s is 18.73 billion USD, indicating their market valuations are broadly comparable.

AS’s beta of 3.65 points to significantly higher volatility compared to TPR (beta: 1.48), suggesting AS has greater potential for both gains and losses relative to market movements.

Symbol	AS	TPR
Company Name	Amer Sports, Inc.	Tapestry, Inc.
Country	FI	US
Sector	Consumer Cyclical	Consumer Cyclical
Industry	Leisure	Luxury Goods
CEO	Jie Zheng	Joanne C. Crevoiserat
Price	38.87 USD	90.2 USD
Market Cap	21.53 billion USD	18.73 billion USD
Beta	3.65	1.48
Exchange	NYSE	NYSE
IPO Date	February 1, 2024	October 6, 2000
ADR	No	No

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of AS and TPR by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period.

Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

AS vs. TPR: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Profitability

Return on Equity

AS

4.41%

Leisure Industry

Max: 54.14%
Q3: 27.35%
Median: 10.25%
Q1: -5.82%
Min: -50.57%

AS’s Return on Equity of 4.41% is on par with the norm for the Leisure industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

TPR

39.48%

Luxury Goods Industry

Max: 39.48%
Q3: 11.43%
Median: 2.25%
Q1: -9.11%
Min: -9.11%

In the upper quartile for the Luxury Goods industry, TPR’s Return on Equity of 39.48% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

AS vs. TPR: A comparison of their ROE against their respective Leisure and Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Return on Invested Capital

AS

4.80%

Leisure Industry

Max: 18.80%
Q3: 12.83%
Median: 9.71%
Q1: -1.45%
Min: -18.12%

AS’s Return on Invested Capital of 4.80% is in line with the norm for the Leisure industry, reflecting a standard level of efficiency in generating profits from its capital base.

TPR

16.71%

Luxury Goods Industry

Max: 16.71%
Q3: 1.02%
Median: -6.91%
Q1: -28.22%
Min: -28.69%

In the upper quartile for the Luxury Goods industry, TPR’s Return on Invested Capital of 16.71% signifies a highly effective use of its capital to generate profits when compared to its peers.

AS vs. TPR: A comparison of their ROIC against their respective Leisure and Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin

AS

3.70%

Leisure Industry

Max: 14.84%
Q3: 9.75%
Median: 7.51%
Q1: -8.12%
Min: -34.68%

AS’s Net Profit Margin of 3.70% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Leisure industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

TPR

12.50%

Luxury Goods Industry

Max: 0.63%
Q3: 0.63%
Median: -4.31%
Q1: -6.60%
Min: -6.60%

TPR’s Net Profit Margin of 12.50% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Luxury Goods industry. This demonstrates outstanding operational efficiency and a strong competitive advantage in converting revenue into profit.

AS vs. TPR: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin against their respective Leisure and Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin

AS

10.56%

Leisure Industry

Max: 27.89%
Q3: 15.06%
Median: 11.34%
Q1: 2.75%
Min: -10.88%

AS’s Operating Profit Margin of 10.56% is around the midpoint for the Leisure industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

TPR

17.93%

Luxury Goods Industry

Max: 1.62%
Q3: 1.62%
Median: -4.57%
Q1: -8.32%
Min: -16.93%

TPR’s Operating Profit Margin of 17.93% is exceptionally high, placing it well above the typical range for the Luxury Goods industry. This demonstrates outstanding efficiency in managing its core operations, which can be a result of strong pricing power or superior cost control.

AS vs. TPR: A comparison of their Operating Margin against their respective Leisure and Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

Symbol	AS	TPR
Return on Equity (TTM)	4.41%	39.48%
Return on Assets (TTM)	2.37%	11.77%
Return on Invested Capital (TTM)	4.80%	16.71%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)	3.70%	12.50%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)	10.56%	17.93%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)	56.25%	73.41%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio

AS

1.66

Leisure Industry

Max: 2.58
Q3: 2.10
Median: 1.69
Q1: 0.62
Min: 0.31

AS’s Current Ratio of 1.66 aligns with the median group of the Leisure industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

TPR

1.76

Luxury Goods Industry

Max: 1.85
Q3: 1.76
Median: 1.50
Q1: 1.14
Min: 0.87

TPR’s Current Ratio of 1.76 aligns with the median group of the Luxury Goods industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

AS vs. TPR: A comparison of their Current Ratio against their respective Leisure and Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio

AS

0.29

Leisure Industry

Max: 2.86
Q3: 1.42
Median: 0.89
Q1: 0.25
Min: 0.04

AS’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.29 is typical for the Leisure industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

TPR

2.75

Luxury Goods Industry

Max: 8.43
Q3: 4.17
Median: 1.71
Q1: 0.54
Min: 0.17

TPR’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 2.75 is typical for the Luxury Goods industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

AS vs. TPR: A comparison of their D/E Ratio against their respective Leisure and Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio

AS

3.15

Leisure Industry

Max: 10.99
Q3: 6.49
Median: 2.98
Q1: 0.15
Min: -5.46

AS’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 3.15 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Leisure industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

TPR

12.20

Luxury Goods Industry

Max: 12.20
Q3: 3.83
Median: -4.54
Q1: -6.01
Min: -7.49

TPR’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 12.20 is in the upper quartile for the Luxury Goods industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

AS vs. TPR: A comparison of their Interest Coverage against their respective Leisure and Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

Symbol	AS	TPR
Current Ratio (TTM)	1.66	1.76
Quick Ratio (TTM)	0.80	1.22
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM)	0.29	2.75
Debt-to-Asset Ratio (TTM)	0.18	0.56
Net Debt-to-EBITDA Ratio (TTM)	1.75	2.15
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)	3.15	12.20

Growth

The following charts compare key year-over-year (YoY) growth metrics for AS and TPR. These metrics are based on the companies’ annual financial reports.

Revenue Growth

AS vs. TPR: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Revenue Growth.

Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth

AS vs. TPR: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth.

Free Cash Flow Growth

AS vs. TPR: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Free Cash Flow Growth.

Dividend

Dividend Yield

AS

0.00%

Leisure Industry

Max: 3.83%
Q3: 0.15%
Median: 0.00%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

AS currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

TPR

1.55%

Luxury Goods Industry

Max: 1.61%
Q3: 1.44%
Median: 0.00%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 1.55%, TPR offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Luxury Goods industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

AS vs. TPR: A comparison of their Dividend Yield against their respective Leisure and Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio

AS

0.00%

Leisure Industry

Max: 91.69%
Q3: 14.53%
Median: 0.00%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

AS has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

TPR

35.71%

Luxury Goods Industry

Max: 138.97%
Q3: 35.71%
Median: 0.00%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

TPR’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 35.71% is within the typical range for the Luxury Goods industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

AS vs. TPR: A comparison of their Payout Ratio against their respective Leisure and Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

Symbol	AS	TPR
Dividend Yield (TTM)	0.00%	1.55%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)	0.00%	35.71%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio

AS

107.87

Leisure Industry

Max: 50.94
Q3: 41.43
Median: 24.00
Q1: 14.24
Min: 11.70

At 107.87, AS’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Leisure industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

TPR

21.75

Luxury Goods Industry

Max: 82.17
Q3: 66.88
Median: 51.59
Q1: 36.30
Min: 21.01

In the lower quartile for the Luxury Goods industry, TPR’s P/E Ratio of 21.75 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

AS vs. TPR: A comparison of their P/E Ratio against their respective Leisure and Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Forward P/E to Growth Ratio

AS

4.82

Leisure Industry

Max: 5.65
Q3: 3.47
Median: 1.94
Q1: 1.14
Min: 0.00

A Forward PEG Ratio of 4.82 places AS in the upper quartile for the Leisure industry. This suggests the stock is potentially expensive compared to its peers relative to its growth forecast, which may warrant caution.

TPR

1.29

Luxury Goods Industry

Max: 8.34
Q3: 3.44
Median: 0.72
Q1: 0.16
Min: 0.05

TPR’s Forward PEG Ratio of 1.29 is within the middle range of its peers in the Luxury Goods industry. This suggests a reasonable balance between the stock’s price and its expected growth, aligning with sector valuation norms.

AS vs. TPR: A comparison of their Forward PEG Ratio against their respective Leisure and Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio

AS

3.95

Leisure Industry

Max: 4.00
Q3: 2.41
Median: 1.45
Q1: 1.18
Min: 0.36

AS’s P/S Ratio of 3.95 is in the upper echelon for the Leisure industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

TPR

2.72

Luxury Goods Industry

Max: 0.90
Q3: 0.90
Median: 0.65
Q1: 0.50
Min: 0.47

With a P/S Ratio of 2.72, TPR trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Luxury Goods industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

AS vs. TPR: A comparison of their P/S Ratio against their respective Leisure and Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio

AS

4.18

Leisure Industry

Max: 5.76
Q3: 4.55
Median: 3.57
Q1: 2.69
Min: 0.30

AS’s P/B Ratio of 4.18 is within the conventional range for the Leisure industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

TPR

12.52

Luxury Goods Industry

Max: 12.09
Q3: 7.26
Median: 3.81
Q1: 1.83
Min: 1.41

At 12.52, TPR’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Luxury Goods industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

AS vs. TPR: A comparison of their P/B Ratio against their respective Leisure and Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

Symbol	AS	TPR
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM)	107.87	21.75
Forward PEG Ratio (TTM)	4.82	1.29
Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM)	3.95	2.72
Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM)	4.18	12.52
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM)	89.77	21.00
EV-to-EBITDA (TTM)	35.61	15.27
EV-to-Sales (TTM)	4.15	3.17