Seek Returns logo

AS vs. SW: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at AS and SW, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolASSW
Company NameAmer Sports, Inc.Smurfit Westrock Plc
CountryFinlandIreland
GICS SectorConsumer DiscretionaryMaterials
GICS IndustryTextiles, Apparel & Luxury GoodsContainers & Packaging
Market Capitalization20.61 billion USD21.90 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateFebruary 1, 2024June 17, 2008
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of AS and SW by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

AS vs. SW: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolASSW
5-Day Price Return-8.55%-4.05%
13-Week Price Return14.77%-9.57%
26-Week Price Return18.62%-23.24%
52-Week Price Return211.87%-3.54%
Month-to-Date Return-4.79%-5.48%
Year-to-Date Return27.83%-22.11%
10-Day Avg. Volume4.90M4.11M
3-Month Avg. Volume4.24M3.61M
3-Month Volatility50.67%31.62%
Beta0.961.10

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

AS

4.41%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
53.33%
Q3
26.13%
Median
18.47%
Q1
7.99%
Min
-10.49%

AS’s Return on Equity of 4.41% is in the lower quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This indicates a less efficient generation of profit from its equity base when compared to its competitors.

SW

2.94%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
41.66%
Q3
20.76%
Median
14.35%
Q1
6.55%
Min
3.64%

A Return on Equity of 2.94% places SW below the typical range for the Containers & Packaging industry. This suggests challenges in efficiently using shareholder capital to generate profit, which could point to operational issues or a conservative capital structure.

AS vs. SW: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods and Containers & Packaging industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

AS

3.70%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
23.35%
Q3
13.49%
Median
8.45%
Q1
4.18%
Min
-3.90%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, AS’s Net Profit Margin of 3.70% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

SW

1.18%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
11.61%
Q3
8.17%
Median
4.91%
Q1
4.20%
Min
0.08%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Containers & Packaging industry, SW’s Net Profit Margin of 1.18% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

AS vs. SW: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods and Containers & Packaging industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

AS

9.68%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
29.47%
Q3
20.87%
Median
13.00%
Q1
7.02%
Min
-3.59%

AS’s Operating Profit Margin of 9.68% is around the midpoint for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

SW

4.20%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
22.03%
Q3
13.17%
Median
8.87%
Q1
6.86%
Min
0.07%

SW’s Operating Profit Margin of 4.20% is in the lower quartile for the Containers & Packaging industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

AS vs. SW: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods and Containers & Packaging industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolASSW
Return on Equity (TTM)4.41%2.94%
Return on Assets (TTM)2.38%1.17%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)3.70%1.18%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)9.68%4.20%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)56.22%19.46%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

AS

1.66

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
3.91
Q3
2.49
Median
1.89
Q1
1.43
Min
0.80

AS’s Current Ratio of 1.66 aligns with the median group of the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

SW

1.45

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
2.13
Q3
1.57
Median
1.27
Q1
1.13
Min
0.58

SW’s Current Ratio of 1.45 aligns with the median group of the Containers & Packaging industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

AS vs. SW: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods and Containers & Packaging industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

AS

0.29

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
2.67
Q3
1.29
Median
0.59
Q1
0.24
Min
0.00

AS’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.29 is typical for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

SW

0.79

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
4.50
Q3
2.23
Median
1.22
Q1
0.54
Min
0.23

SW’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.79 is typical for the Containers & Packaging industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

AS vs. SW: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods and Containers & Packaging industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

AS

1.61

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
57.00
Q3
35.85
Median
9.20
Q1
4.29
Min
-32.49

In the lower quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, AS’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 1.61 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

SW

2.41

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
13.16
Q3
8.10
Median
3.61
Q1
2.94
Min
1.06

In the lower quartile for the Containers & Packaging industry, SW’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 2.41 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

AS vs. SW: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods and Containers & Packaging industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolASSW
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.661.45
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.670.95
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.290.79
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)1.612.41

Growth

Revenue Growth

AS vs. SW: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

AS vs. SW: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

AS

0.00%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
6.59%
Q3
3.60%
Median
2.59%
Q1
0.95%
Min
0.00%

AS currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

SW

3.50%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
7.37%
Q3
4.07%
Median
3.33%
Q1
1.72%
Min
0.00%

SW’s Dividend Yield of 3.50% is consistent with its peers in the Containers & Packaging industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

AS vs. SW: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods and Containers & Packaging industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

AS

0.00%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
195.44%
Q3
106.47%
Median
58.77%
Q1
36.52%
Min
0.00%

AS has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

SW

85.87%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
221.20%
Q3
119.52%
Median
58.05%
Q1
28.91%
Min
0.00%

SW’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 85.87% is within the typical range for the Containers & Packaging industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

AS vs. SW: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods and Containers & Packaging industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolASSW
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%3.50%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%85.87%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

AS

101.86

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
63.29
Q3
34.64
Median
18.01
Q1
13.88
Min
6.04

At 101.86, AS’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

SW

41.59

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
35.98
Q3
27.87
Median
16.15
Q1
14.38
Min
8.20

At 41.59, SW’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Containers & Packaging industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

AS vs. SW: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods and Containers & Packaging industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

AS

3.77

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
5.46
Q3
3.13
Median
1.72
Q1
0.83
Min
0.26

AS’s P/S Ratio of 3.77 is in the upper echelon for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

SW

0.49

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
2.91
Q3
1.67
Median
0.83
Q1
0.64
Min
0.30

In the lower quartile for the Containers & Packaging industry, SW’s P/S Ratio of 0.49 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

AS vs. SW: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods and Containers & Packaging industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

AS

2.84

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
9.76
Q3
6.00
Median
3.26
Q1
1.97
Min
0.69

AS’s P/B Ratio of 2.84 is within the conventional range for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

SW

1.23

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
5.28
Q3
3.30
Median
2.35
Q1
1.57
Min
0.89

SW’s P/B Ratio of 1.23 is in the lower quartile for the Containers & Packaging industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

AS vs. SW: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods and Containers & Packaging industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolASSW
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)101.8641.59
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)3.770.49
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)2.841.23
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)56.6742.07