Seek Returns logo

AS vs. NVR: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at AS and NVR, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Overview

AS’s market capitalization stands at 21.53 billion USD, while NVR’s is 22.29 billion USD, indicating their market valuations are broadly comparable.

AS’s beta of 3.65 points to significantly higher volatility compared to NVR (beta: 0.99), suggesting AS has greater potential for both gains and losses relative to market movements.

SymbolASNVR
Company NameAmer Sports, Inc.NVR, Inc.
CountryFIUS
SectorConsumer CyclicalConsumer Cyclical
IndustryLeisureResidential Construction
CEOJie ZhengEugene James Bredow
Price38.87 USD7,623.24 USD
Market Cap21.53 billion USD22.29 billion USD
Beta3.650.99
ExchangeNYSENYSE
IPO DateFebruary 1, 2024July 22, 1985
ADRNoNo

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of AS and NVR by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period.

Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

AS vs. NVR: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Profitability

Return on Equity

AS

4.41%

Leisure Industry

Max
54.14%
Q3
27.35%
Median
10.25%
Q1
-5.82%
Min
-50.57%

AS’s Return on Equity of 4.41% is on par with the norm for the Leisure industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

NVR

38.32%

Residential Construction Industry

Max
38.32%
Q3
24.08%
Median
16.46%
Q1
12.92%
Min
7.81%

In the upper quartile for the Residential Construction industry, NVR’s Return on Equity of 38.32% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

AS vs. NVR: A comparison of their ROE against their respective Leisure and Residential Construction industry benchmarks.

Return on Invested Capital

AS

4.80%

Leisure Industry

Max
18.80%
Q3
12.83%
Median
9.71%
Q1
-1.45%
Min
-18.12%

AS’s Return on Invested Capital of 4.80% is in line with the norm for the Leisure industry, reflecting a standard level of efficiency in generating profits from its capital base.

NVR

29.05%

Residential Construction Industry

Max
19.08%
Q3
12.67%
Median
11.66%
Q1
8.04%
Min
3.73%

NVR’s Return on Invested Capital of 29.05% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Residential Construction industry. This demonstrates an outstanding ability to deploy capital efficiently and create significant value.

AS vs. NVR: A comparison of their ROIC against their respective Leisure and Residential Construction industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin

AS

3.70%

Leisure Industry

Max
14.84%
Q3
9.75%
Median
7.51%
Q1
-8.12%
Min
-34.68%

AS’s Net Profit Margin of 3.70% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Leisure industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

NVR

15.12%

Residential Construction Industry

Max
17.37%
Q3
12.35%
Median
10.36%
Q1
8.29%
Min
3.91%

A Net Profit Margin of 15.12% places NVR in the upper quartile for the Residential Construction industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

AS vs. NVR: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin against their respective Leisure and Residential Construction industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin

AS

10.56%

Leisure Industry

Max
27.89%
Q3
15.06%
Median
11.34%
Q1
2.75%
Min
-10.88%

AS’s Operating Profit Margin of 10.56% is around the midpoint for the Leisure industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

NVR

17.77%

Residential Construction Industry

Max
22.34%
Q3
15.74%
Median
12.30%
Q1
9.51%
Min
4.20%

An Operating Profit Margin of 17.77% places NVR in the upper quartile for the Residential Construction industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

AS vs. NVR: A comparison of their Operating Margin against their respective Leisure and Residential Construction industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolASNVR
Return on Equity (TTM)4.41%38.32%
Return on Assets (TTM)2.37%25.62%
Return on Invested Capital (TTM)4.80%29.05%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)3.70%15.12%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)10.56%17.77%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)56.25%24.18%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio

AS

1.66

Leisure Industry

Max
2.58
Q3
2.10
Median
1.69
Q1
0.62
Min
0.31

AS’s Current Ratio of 1.66 aligns with the median group of the Leisure industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

NVR

3.65

Residential Construction Industry

Max
26.19
Q3
13.52
Median
7.75
Q1
3.72
Min
1.49

NVR’s Current Ratio of 3.65 falls into the lower quartile for the Residential Construction industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

AS vs. NVR: A comparison of their Current Ratio against their respective Leisure and Residential Construction industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio

AS

0.29

Leisure Industry

Max
2.86
Q3
1.42
Median
0.89
Q1
0.25
Min
0.04

AS’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.29 is typical for the Leisure industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

NVR

0.26

Residential Construction Industry

Max
0.60
Q3
0.40
Median
0.33
Q1
0.17
Min
0.00

NVR’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.26 is typical for the Residential Construction industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

AS vs. NVR: A comparison of their D/E Ratio against their respective Leisure and Residential Construction industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio

AS

3.15

Leisure Industry

Max
10.99
Q3
6.49
Median
2.98
Q1
0.15
Min
-5.46

AS’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 3.15 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Leisure industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

NVR

65.68

Residential Construction Industry

Max
137.53
Q3
119.57
Median
59.70
Q1
34.03
Min
10.68

NVR’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 65.68 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Residential Construction industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

AS vs. NVR: A comparison of their Interest Coverage against their respective Leisure and Residential Construction industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolASNVR
Current Ratio (TTM)1.663.65
Quick Ratio (TTM)0.801.91
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM)0.290.26
Debt-to-Asset Ratio (TTM)0.180.17
Net Debt-to-EBITDA Ratio (TTM)1.75-0.60
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)3.1565.68

Growth

The following charts compare key year-over-year (YoY) growth metrics for AS and NVR. These metrics are based on the companies’ annual financial reports.

Revenue Growth

AS vs. NVR: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Revenue Growth.

Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth

AS vs. NVR: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth.

Free Cash Flow Growth

AS vs. NVR: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Free Cash Flow Growth.

Dividend

Dividend Yield

AS

0.00%

Leisure Industry

Max
3.83%
Q3
0.15%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

AS currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

NVR

0.00%

Residential Construction Industry

Max
2.41%
Q3
1.31%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

NVR currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

AS vs. NVR: A comparison of their Dividend Yield against their respective Leisure and Residential Construction industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio

AS

0.00%

Leisure Industry

Max
91.69%
Q3
14.53%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

AS has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

NVR

0.00%

Residential Construction Industry

Max
35.19%
Q3
10.57%
Median
2.40%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

NVR has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

AS vs. NVR: A comparison of their Payout Ratio against their respective Leisure and Residential Construction industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolASNVR
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio

AS

107.87

Leisure Industry

Max
50.94
Q3
41.43
Median
24.00
Q1
14.24
Min
11.70

At 107.87, AS’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Leisure industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

NVR

14.33

Residential Construction Industry

Max
9.55
Q3
9.42
Median
7.20
Q1
6.63
Min
3.19

At 14.33, NVR’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Residential Construction industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

AS vs. NVR: A comparison of their P/E Ratio against their respective Leisure and Residential Construction industry benchmarks.

Forward P/E to Growth Ratio

AS

4.82

Leisure Industry

Max
5.65
Q3
3.47
Median
1.94
Q1
1.14
Min
0.00

A Forward PEG Ratio of 4.82 places AS in the upper quartile for the Leisure industry. This suggests the stock is potentially expensive compared to its peers relative to its growth forecast, which may warrant caution.

NVR

0.91

Residential Construction Industry

Max
2.03
Q3
1.05
Median
0.49
Q1
0.25
Min
0.10

The Forward PEG Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric in the Residential Construction industry.

AS vs. NVR: A comparison of their Forward PEG Ratio against their respective Leisure and Residential Construction industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio

AS

3.95

Leisure Industry

Max
4.00
Q3
2.41
Median
1.45
Q1
1.18
Min
0.36

AS’s P/S Ratio of 3.95 is in the upper echelon for the Leisure industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

NVR

2.12

Residential Construction Industry

Max
2.31
Q3
1.33
Median
0.79
Q1
0.56
Min
0.20

NVR’s P/S Ratio of 2.12 is in the upper echelon for the Residential Construction industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

AS vs. NVR: A comparison of their P/S Ratio against their respective Leisure and Residential Construction industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio

AS

4.18

Leisure Industry

Max
5.76
Q3
4.55
Median
3.57
Q1
2.69
Min
0.30

AS’s P/B Ratio of 4.18 is within the conventional range for the Leisure industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

NVR

5.75

Residential Construction Industry

Max
2.33
Q3
1.66
Median
1.08
Q1
0.86
Min
0.55

At 5.75, NVR’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Residential Construction industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

AS vs. NVR: A comparison of their P/B Ratio against their respective Leisure and Residential Construction industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolASNVR
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM)107.8714.33
Forward PEG Ratio (TTM)4.820.91
Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM)3.952.12
Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM)4.185.75
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM)89.7715.79
EV-to-EBITDA (TTM)35.6110.04
EV-to-Sales (TTM)4.152.00