Seek Returns logo

AS vs. LULU: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at AS and LULU, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolASLULU
Company NameAmer Sports, Inc.lululemon athletica inc.
CountryFinlandCanada
GICS SectorConsumer DiscretionaryConsumer Discretionary
GICS IndustryTextiles, Apparel & Luxury GoodsTextiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods
Market Capitalization20.61 billion USD23.74 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENasdaqGS
Listing DateFebruary 1, 2024July 27, 2007
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of AS and LULU by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

AS vs. LULU: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolASLULU
5-Day Price Return-8.55%1.50%
13-Week Price Return14.77%-38.80%
26-Week Price Return18.62%-49.31%
52-Week Price Return211.87%-23.54%
Month-to-Date Return-4.79%-1.20%
Year-to-Date Return27.83%-48.19%
10-Day Avg. Volume4.90M3.75M
3-Month Avg. Volume4.24M2.99M
3-Month Volatility50.67%50.78%
Beta0.961.10

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

AS

4.41%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
53.33%
Q3
26.13%
Median
18.47%
Q1
7.99%
Min
-10.49%

AS’s Return on Equity of 4.41% is in the lower quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This indicates a less efficient generation of profit from its equity base when compared to its competitors.

LULU

43.48%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
53.33%
Q3
26.13%
Median
18.47%
Q1
7.99%
Min
-10.49%

In the upper quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, LULU’s Return on Equity of 43.48% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

AS vs. LULU: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmark.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

AS

3.70%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
23.35%
Q3
13.49%
Median
8.45%
Q1
4.18%
Min
-3.90%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, AS’s Net Profit Margin of 3.70% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

LULU

16.82%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
23.35%
Q3
13.49%
Median
8.45%
Q1
4.18%
Min
-3.90%

A Net Profit Margin of 16.82% places LULU in the upper quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

AS vs. LULU: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmark.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

AS

9.68%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
29.47%
Q3
20.87%
Median
13.00%
Q1
7.02%
Min
-3.59%

AS’s Operating Profit Margin of 9.68% is around the midpoint for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

LULU

23.36%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
29.47%
Q3
20.87%
Median
13.00%
Q1
7.02%
Min
-3.59%

An Operating Profit Margin of 23.36% places LULU in the upper quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

AS vs. LULU: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmark.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolASLULU
Return on Equity (TTM)4.41%43.48%
Return on Assets (TTM)2.38%25.05%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)3.70%16.82%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)9.68%23.36%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)56.22%59.34%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

AS

1.66

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
3.91
Q3
2.49
Median
1.89
Q1
1.43
Min
0.80

AS’s Current Ratio of 1.66 aligns with the median group of the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

LULU

2.28

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
3.91
Q3
2.49
Median
1.89
Q1
1.43
Min
0.80

LULU’s Current Ratio of 2.28 aligns with the median group of the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

AS vs. LULU: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmark.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

AS

0.29

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
2.67
Q3
1.29
Median
0.59
Q1
0.24
Min
0.00

AS’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.29 is typical for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

LULU

0.00

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
2.67
Q3
1.29
Median
0.59
Q1
0.24
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, LULU’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.00 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

AS vs. LULU: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmark.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

AS

1.61

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
57.00
Q3
35.85
Median
9.20
Q1
4.29
Min
-32.49

In the lower quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, AS’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 1.61 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

LULU

-47.83

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
57.00
Q3
35.85
Median
9.20
Q1
4.29
Min
-32.49

LULU has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -47.83. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

AS vs. LULU: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmark.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolASLULU
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.662.28
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.670.98
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.290.00
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)1.61-47.83

Growth

Revenue Growth

AS vs. LULU: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

AS vs. LULU: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

AS

0.00%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
6.59%
Q3
3.60%
Median
2.59%
Q1
0.95%
Min
0.00%

AS currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

LULU

0.00%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
6.59%
Q3
3.60%
Median
2.59%
Q1
0.95%
Min
0.00%

LULU currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

AS vs. LULU: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

AS

0.00%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
195.44%
Q3
106.47%
Median
58.77%
Q1
36.52%
Min
0.00%

AS has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

LULU

0.00%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
195.44%
Q3
106.47%
Median
58.77%
Q1
36.52%
Min
0.00%

LULU has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

AS vs. LULU: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmark.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolASLULU
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

AS

101.86

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
63.29
Q3
34.64
Median
18.01
Q1
13.88
Min
6.04

At 101.86, AS’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

LULU

13.67

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
63.29
Q3
34.64
Median
18.01
Q1
13.88
Min
6.04

In the lower quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, LULU’s P/E Ratio of 13.67 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

AS vs. LULU: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmark.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

AS

3.77

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
5.46
Q3
3.13
Median
1.72
Q1
0.83
Min
0.26

AS’s P/S Ratio of 3.77 is in the upper echelon for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

LULU

2.30

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
5.46
Q3
3.13
Median
1.72
Q1
0.83
Min
0.26

LULU’s P/S Ratio of 2.30 aligns with the market consensus for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

AS vs. LULU: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmark.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

AS

2.84

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
9.76
Q3
6.00
Median
3.26
Q1
1.97
Min
0.69

AS’s P/B Ratio of 2.84 is within the conventional range for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

LULU

7.80

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
9.76
Q3
6.00
Median
3.26
Q1
1.97
Min
0.69

LULU’s P/B Ratio of 7.80 is in the upper tier for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

AS vs. LULU: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmark.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolASLULU
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)101.8613.67
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)3.772.30
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)2.847.80
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)56.6715.57