Seek Returns logo

AS vs. GM: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at AS and GM, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolASGM
Company NameAmer Sports, Inc.General Motors Company
CountryFinlandUnited States
GICS SectorConsumer DiscretionaryConsumer Discretionary
GICS IndustryTextiles, Apparel & Luxury GoodsAutomobiles
Market Capitalization17.03 billion USD65.87 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateFebruary 1, 2024November 18, 2010
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of AS and GM by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

AS vs. GM: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolASGM
5-Day Price Return0.76%-0.75%
13-Week Price Return-21.54%25.24%
26-Week Price Return-2.66%39.75%
52-Week Price Return54.16%22.20%
Month-to-Date Return-2.75%2.07%
Year-to-Date Return8.62%32.38%
10-Day Avg. Volume4.57M8.11M
3-Month Avg. Volume4.56M8.84M
3-Month Volatility42.22%36.45%
Beta0.991.34

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

AS

4.52%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
46.95%
Q3
26.41%
Median
17.82%
Q1
9.41%
Min
-8.23%

AS’s Return on Equity of 4.52% is in the lower quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This indicates a less efficient generation of profit from its equity base when compared to its competitors.

GM

4.68%

Automobiles Industry

Max
28.52%
Q3
12.92%
Median
5.04%
Q1
-1.15%
Min
-15.36%

GM’s Return on Equity of 4.68% is on par with the norm for the Automobiles industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

AS vs. GM: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

AS

3.93%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
21.16%
Q3
13.26%
Median
7.68%
Q1
4.48%
Min
-3.05%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, AS’s Net Profit Margin of 3.93% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

GM

1.62%

Automobiles Industry

Max
10.74%
Q3
5.64%
Median
2.77%
Q1
-0.52%
Min
-6.61%

GM’s Net Profit Margin of 1.62% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Automobiles industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

AS vs. GM: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

AS

9.84%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
28.42%
Q3
20.87%
Median
12.08%
Q1
6.65%
Min
-0.12%

AS’s Operating Profit Margin of 9.84% is around the midpoint for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

GM

2.05%

Automobiles Industry

Max
13.07%
Q3
7.22%
Median
4.62%
Q1
-0.45%
Min
-6.16%

GM’s Operating Profit Margin of 2.05% is around the midpoint for the Automobiles industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

AS vs. GM: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolASGM
Return on Equity (TTM)4.52%4.68%
Return on Assets (TTM)2.58%1.07%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)3.93%1.62%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)9.84%2.05%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)56.84%9.28%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

AS

1.60

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
3.07
Q3
2.20
Median
1.62
Q1
1.47
Min
0.70

AS’s Current Ratio of 1.60 aligns with the median group of the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

GM

1.23

Automobiles Industry

Max
2.13
Q3
1.58
Median
1.28
Q1
1.09
Min
0.47

GM’s Current Ratio of 1.23 aligns with the median group of the Automobiles industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

AS vs. GM: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

AS

0.29

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
2.53
Q3
1.30
Median
0.59
Q1
0.27
Min
0.00

AS’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.29 is typical for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

GM

2.00

Automobiles Industry

Max
2.00
Q3
1.15
Median
0.60
Q1
0.28
Min
0.05

GM’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Automobiles industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 2.00. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

AS vs. GM: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

AS

1.61

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
85.38
Q3
37.37
Median
8.62
Q1
4.18
Min
-32.49

In the lower quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, AS’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 1.61 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

GM

25.00

Automobiles Industry

Max
77.87
Q3
35.88
Median
13.88
Q1
3.52
Min
-19.31

GM’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 25.00 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Automobiles industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

AS vs. GM: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolASGM
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.601.23
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.481.06
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.292.00
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)1.6125.00

Growth

Revenue Growth

AS vs. GM: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

AS vs. GM: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

AS

0.00%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
4.60%
Q3
3.43%
Median
2.28%
Q1
1.12%
Min
0.00%

AS currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

GM

0.98%

Automobiles Industry

Max
10.18%
Q3
4.88%
Median
2.84%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

GM’s Dividend Yield of 0.98% is consistent with its peers in the Automobiles industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

AS vs. GM: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

AS

0.00%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
156.63%
Q3
96.75%
Median
57.64%
Q1
34.78%
Min
0.00%

AS has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

GM

8.64%

Automobiles Industry

Max
114.43%
Q3
60.59%
Median
39.48%
Q1
20.22%
Min
0.00%

GM’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 8.64% is in the lower quartile for the Automobiles industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

AS vs. GM: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolASGM
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.98%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%8.64%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

AS

76.05

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
76.57
Q3
39.44
Median
22.87
Q1
14.62
Min
7.99

A P/E Ratio of 76.05 places AS in the upper quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

GM

21.61

Automobiles Industry

Max
31.96
Q3
22.07
Median
11.17
Q1
8.41
Min
5.02

GM’s P/E Ratio of 21.61 is within the middle range for the Automobiles industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

AS vs. GM: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

AS

2.99

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
5.07
Q3
2.88
Median
1.80
Q1
0.93
Min
0.28

AS’s P/S Ratio of 2.99 is in the upper echelon for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

GM

0.35

Automobiles Industry

Max
1.29
Q3
0.84
Median
0.51
Q1
0.27
Min
0.08

GM’s P/S Ratio of 0.35 aligns with the market consensus for the Automobiles industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

AS vs. GM: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

AS

3.90

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
11.14
Q3
5.70
Median
3.35
Q1
2.02
Min
0.56

AS’s P/B Ratio of 3.90 is within the conventional range for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

GM

0.87

Automobiles Industry

Max
3.99
Q3
1.96
Median
0.87
Q1
0.46
Min
0.18

GM’s P/B Ratio of 0.87 is within the conventional range for the Automobiles industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

AS vs. GM: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolASGM
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)76.0521.61
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)2.990.35
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)3.900.87
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)46.8947.64