Seek Returns logo

AS vs. EBAY: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at AS and EBAY, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolASEBAY
Company NameAmer Sports, Inc.eBay Inc.
CountryFinlandUnited States
GICS SectorConsumer DiscretionaryConsumer Discretionary
GICS IndustryTextiles, Apparel & Luxury GoodsBroadline Retail
Market Capitalization22.77 billion USD42.81 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENasdaqGS
Listing DateFebruary 1, 2024September 24, 1998
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of AS and EBAY by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

AS vs. EBAY: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolASEBAY
5-Day Price Return10.35%-5.25%
13-Week Price Return6.62%29.31%
26-Week Price Return43.53%34.99%
52-Week Price Return189.70%58.76%
Month-to-Date Return9.35%2.09%
Year-to-Date Return46.82%51.20%
10-Day Avg. Volume6.44M5.80M
3-Month Avg. Volume4.40M5.77M
3-Month Volatility41.55%42.25%
Beta0.891.32

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

AS

4.41%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
53.33%
Q3
26.13%
Median
18.47%
Q1
7.99%
Min
-10.49%

AS’s Return on Equity of 4.41% is in the lower quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This indicates a less efficient generation of profit from its equity base when compared to its competitors.

EBAY

43.08%

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
49.17%
Q3
28.98%
Median
19.22%
Q1
10.86%
Min
-11.14%

In the upper quartile for the Broadline Retail industry, EBAY’s Return on Equity of 43.08% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

AS vs. EBAY: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

AS

3.70%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
23.35%
Q3
13.49%
Median
8.45%
Q1
4.18%
Min
-3.90%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, AS’s Net Profit Margin of 3.70% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

EBAY

20.86%

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
19.78%
Q3
11.90%
Median
8.63%
Q1
5.21%
Min
0.82%

EBAY’s Net Profit Margin of 20.86% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Broadline Retail industry. This demonstrates outstanding operational efficiency and a strong competitive advantage in converting revenue into profit.

AS vs. EBAY: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

AS

9.68%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
29.47%
Q3
20.87%
Median
13.00%
Q1
7.02%
Min
-3.59%

AS’s Operating Profit Margin of 9.68% is around the midpoint for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

EBAY

21.38%

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
27.23%
Q3
15.96%
Median
11.13%
Q1
8.31%
Min
1.77%

An Operating Profit Margin of 21.38% places EBAY in the upper quartile for the Broadline Retail industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

AS vs. EBAY: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolASEBAY
Return on Equity (TTM)4.41%43.08%
Return on Assets (TTM)2.38%11.47%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)3.70%20.86%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)9.68%21.38%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)56.22%71.88%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

AS

1.66

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
3.91
Q3
2.49
Median
1.89
Q1
1.43
Min
0.80

AS’s Current Ratio of 1.66 aligns with the median group of the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

EBAY

1.00

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
3.54
Q3
2.42
Median
1.49
Q1
1.22
Min
0.67

EBAY’s Current Ratio of 1.00 falls into the lower quartile for the Broadline Retail industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

AS vs. EBAY: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

AS

0.29

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
2.67
Q3
1.29
Median
0.59
Q1
0.24
Min
0.00

AS’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.29 is typical for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

EBAY

1.42

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
2.14
Q3
1.34
Median
0.63
Q1
0.27
Min
0.00

EBAY’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Broadline Retail industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.42. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

AS vs. EBAY: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

AS

1.61

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
57.00
Q3
35.85
Median
9.20
Q1
4.29
Min
-32.49

In the lower quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, AS’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 1.61 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

EBAY

57.95

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
37.34
Q3
20.63
Median
11.28
Q1
4.22
Min
-19.29

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 57.95, EBAY demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Broadline Retail industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

AS vs. EBAY: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolASEBAY
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.661.00
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.670.97
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.291.42
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)1.6157.95

Growth

Revenue Growth

AS vs. EBAY: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

AS vs. EBAY: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

AS

0.00%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
6.59%
Q3
3.60%
Median
2.59%
Q1
0.95%
Min
0.00%

AS currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

EBAY

1.15%

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
5.46%
Q3
2.38%
Median
0.43%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

EBAY’s Dividend Yield of 1.15% is consistent with its peers in the Broadline Retail industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

AS vs. EBAY: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

AS

0.00%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
195.44%
Q3
106.47%
Median
58.77%
Q1
36.52%
Min
0.00%

AS has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

EBAY

24.13%

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
131.17%
Q3
63.48%
Median
29.43%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

EBAY’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 24.13% is within the typical range for the Broadline Retail industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

AS vs. EBAY: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolASEBAY
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%1.15%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%24.13%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

AS

101.86

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
63.29
Q3
34.64
Median
18.01
Q1
13.88
Min
6.04

At 101.86, AS’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

EBAY

20.98

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
66.12
Q3
35.17
Median
16.29
Q1
10.47
Min
5.94

EBAY’s P/E Ratio of 20.98 is within the middle range for the Broadline Retail industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

AS vs. EBAY: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

AS

3.77

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
5.46
Q3
3.13
Median
1.72
Q1
0.83
Min
0.26

AS’s P/S Ratio of 3.77 is in the upper echelon for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

EBAY

4.38

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
5.40
Q3
3.33
Median
2.04
Q1
0.80
Min
0.16

EBAY’s P/S Ratio of 4.38 is in the upper echelon for the Broadline Retail industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

AS vs. EBAY: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

AS

2.84

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
9.76
Q3
6.00
Median
3.26
Q1
1.97
Min
0.69

AS’s P/B Ratio of 2.84 is within the conventional range for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

EBAY

7.23

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
9.06
Q3
5.22
Median
3.48
Q1
1.90
Min
0.74

EBAY’s P/B Ratio of 7.23 is in the upper tier for the Broadline Retail industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

AS vs. EBAY: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolASEBAY
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)101.8620.98
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)3.774.38
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)2.847.23
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)56.6721.53