Seek Returns logo

AS vs. BALL: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at AS and BALL, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolASBALL
Company NameAmer Sports, Inc.Ball Corporation
CountryFinlandUnited States
GICS SectorConsumer DiscretionaryMaterials
GICS IndustryTextiles, Apparel & Luxury GoodsContainers & Packaging
Market Capitalization19.15 billion USD13.25 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateFebruary 1, 2024February 21, 1973
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of AS and BALL by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

AS vs. BALL: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolASBALL
5-Day Price Return-1.88%-3.53%
13-Week Price Return-10.31%-15.95%
26-Week Price Return40.54%-3.56%
52-Week Price Return101.11%-23.85%
Month-to-Date Return-0.63%-3.41%
Year-to-Date Return23.50%-11.66%
10-Day Avg. Volume4.55M2.22M
3-Month Avg. Volume4.21M2.37M
3-Month Volatility41.67%23.01%
Beta0.981.15

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

AS

4.52%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
42.05%
Q3
24.41%
Median
17.18%
Q1
7.87%
Min
-8.23%

AS’s Return on Equity of 4.52% is in the lower quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This indicates a less efficient generation of profit from its equity base when compared to its competitors.

BALL

9.56%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
36.99%
Q3
19.86%
Median
10.47%
Q1
6.76%
Min
-0.20%

BALL’s Return on Equity of 9.56% is on par with the norm for the Containers & Packaging industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

AS vs. BALL: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods and Containers & Packaging industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

AS

3.93%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
21.16%
Q3
13.26%
Median
6.06%
Q1
3.93%
Min
-3.05%

AS’s Net Profit Margin of 3.93% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

BALL

4.48%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
10.84%
Q3
8.25%
Median
4.91%
Q1
3.65%
Min
-0.12%

BALL’s Net Profit Margin of 4.48% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Containers & Packaging industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

AS vs. BALL: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods and Containers & Packaging industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

AS

9.84%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
29.47%
Q3
20.87%
Median
11.68%
Q1
6.26%
Min
-0.12%

AS’s Operating Profit Margin of 9.84% is around the midpoint for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

BALL

7.89%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
22.03%
Q3
13.09%
Median
8.06%
Q1
6.46%
Min
-0.07%

BALL’s Operating Profit Margin of 7.89% is around the midpoint for the Containers & Packaging industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

AS vs. BALL: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods and Containers & Packaging industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolASBALL
Return on Equity (TTM)4.52%9.56%
Return on Assets (TTM)2.58%3.04%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)3.93%4.48%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)9.84%7.89%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)56.84%20.17%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

AS

1.60

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
2.94
Q3
2.22
Median
1.61
Q1
1.48
Min
0.74

AS’s Current Ratio of 1.60 aligns with the median group of the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

BALL

1.00

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
1.96
Q3
1.45
Median
1.33
Q1
1.09
Min
0.87

BALL’s Current Ratio of 1.00 falls into the lower quartile for the Containers & Packaging industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

AS vs. BALL: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods and Containers & Packaging industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

AS

0.29

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
2.79
Q3
1.32
Median
0.60
Q1
0.27
Min
0.00

AS’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.29 is typical for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

BALL

1.35

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
4.15
Q3
2.03
Median
1.20
Q1
0.53
Min
0.23

BALL’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.35 is typical for the Containers & Packaging industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

AS vs. BALL: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods and Containers & Packaging industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

AS

1.61

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
57.00
Q3
32.83
Median
7.87
Q1
3.52
Min
-32.49

In the lower quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, AS’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 1.61 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

BALL

3.38

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
13.16
Q3
8.10
Median
3.38
Q1
2.83
Min
1.06

BALL’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 3.38 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Containers & Packaging industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

AS vs. BALL: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods and Containers & Packaging industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolASBALL
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.601.00
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.480.67
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.291.35
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)1.613.38

Growth

Revenue Growth

AS vs. BALL: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

AS vs. BALL: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

AS

0.00%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
5.22%
Q3
3.07%
Median
2.34%
Q1
1.11%
Min
0.00%

AS currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

BALL

1.75%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
7.14%
Q3
4.65%
Median
3.69%
Q1
2.00%
Min
0.00%

BALL’s Dividend Yield of 1.75% is in the lower quartile for the Containers & Packaging industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

AS vs. BALL: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods and Containers & Packaging industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

AS

0.00%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
156.63%
Q3
94.60%
Median
52.65%
Q1
35.04%
Min
0.00%

AS has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

BALL

29.25%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
222.75%
Q3
132.16%
Median
65.79%
Q1
28.53%
Min
0.00%

BALL’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 29.25% is within the typical range for the Containers & Packaging industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

AS vs. BALL: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods and Containers & Packaging industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolASBALL
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%1.75%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%29.25%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

AS

85.38

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
48.15
Q3
33.82
Median
20.70
Q1
14.57
Min
7.12

At 85.38, AS’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

BALL

23.77

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
24.22
Q3
20.28
Median
17.07
Q1
15.06
Min
7.79

A P/E Ratio of 23.77 places BALL in the upper quartile for the Containers & Packaging industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

AS vs. BALL: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods and Containers & Packaging industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

AS

3.36

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
4.35
Q3
3.06
Median
1.66
Q1
0.83
Min
0.26

AS’s P/S Ratio of 3.36 is in the upper echelon for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

BALL

1.07

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
1.99
Q3
1.17
Median
0.94
Q1
0.55
Min
0.31

BALL’s P/S Ratio of 1.07 aligns with the market consensus for the Containers & Packaging industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

AS vs. BALL: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods and Containers & Packaging industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

AS

3.90

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
9.74
Q3
5.59
Median
3.41
Q1
2.01
Min
0.56

AS’s P/B Ratio of 3.90 is within the conventional range for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

BALL

2.99

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
4.79
Q3
3.32
Median
2.14
Q1
1.60
Min
0.89

BALL’s P/B Ratio of 2.99 is within the conventional range for the Containers & Packaging industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

AS vs. BALL: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods and Containers & Packaging industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolASBALL
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)85.3823.77
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)3.361.07
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)3.902.99
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)52.6411.78