Seek Returns logo

ARMK vs. TRU: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at ARMK and TRU, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolARMKTRU
Company NameAramarkTransUnion
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorConsumer DiscretionaryIndustrials
GICS IndustryHotels, Restaurants & LeisureProfessional Services
Market Capitalization10.53 billion USD17.10 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateDecember 12, 2013June 25, 2015
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of ARMK and TRU by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

ARMK vs. TRU: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolARMKTRU
5-Day Price Return-3.09%-2.55%
13-Week Price Return0.59%-4.47%
26-Week Price Return4.22%-12.46%
52-Week Price Return10.19%-6.25%
Month-to-Date Return-7.24%-7.81%
Year-to-Date Return5.82%-5.34%
10-Day Avg. Volume2.69M1.95M
3-Month Avg. Volume1.95M2.13M
3-Month Volatility24.63%35.70%
Beta1.231.75

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

ARMK

11.83%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
83.01%
Q3
39.51%
Median
17.38%
Q1
5.32%
Min
-45.92%

ARMK’s Return on Equity of 11.83% is on par with the norm for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

TRU

9.04%

Professional Services Industry

Max
52.17%
Q3
30.06%
Median
22.21%
Q1
11.67%
Min
-13.44%

TRU’s Return on Equity of 9.04% is in the lower quartile for the Professional Services industry. This indicates a less efficient generation of profit from its equity base when compared to its competitors.

ARMK vs. TRU: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

ARMK

2.02%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
26.45%
Q3
14.67%
Median
8.69%
Q1
3.34%
Min
-11.30%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, ARMK’s Net Profit Margin of 2.02% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

TRU

8.99%

Professional Services Industry

Max
26.06%
Q3
13.34%
Median
7.88%
Q1
3.50%
Min
-2.93%

TRU’s Net Profit Margin of 8.99% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Professional Services industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

ARMK vs. TRU: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

ARMK

4.44%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
38.76%
Q3
21.15%
Median
14.20%
Q1
6.43%
Min
-14.56%

ARMK’s Operating Profit Margin of 4.44% is in the lower quartile for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

TRU

17.39%

Professional Services Industry

Max
35.84%
Q3
19.38%
Median
12.54%
Q1
7.36%
Min
-5.21%

TRU’s Operating Profit Margin of 17.39% is around the midpoint for the Professional Services industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

ARMK vs. TRU: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolARMKTRU
Return on Equity (TTM)11.83%9.04%
Return on Assets (TTM)2.77%3.55%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)2.02%8.99%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)4.44%17.39%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)8.55%59.24%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

ARMK

1.29

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
2.68
Q3
1.62
Median
1.11
Q1
0.74
Min
0.19

ARMK’s Current Ratio of 1.29 aligns with the median group of the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

TRU

2.03

Professional Services Industry

Max
2.45
Q3
1.65
Median
1.26
Q1
1.10
Min
0.47

TRU’s Current Ratio of 2.03 is in the upper quartile for the Professional Services industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

ARMK vs. TRU: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

ARMK

2.04

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
9.88
Q3
4.54
Median
1.52
Q1
0.27
Min
0.00

ARMK’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 2.04 is typical for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

TRU

1.14

Professional Services Industry

Max
2.63
Q3
1.44
Median
0.91
Q1
0.49
Min
0.00

TRU’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.14 is typical for the Professional Services industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

ARMK vs. TRU: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

ARMK

2.07

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
26.88
Q3
11.95
Median
3.87
Q1
1.19
Min
-11.84

ARMK’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 2.07 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

TRU

2.99

Professional Services Industry

Max
39.67
Q3
20.05
Median
11.07
Q1
5.36
Min
-2.22

In the lower quartile for the Professional Services industry, TRU’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 2.99 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

ARMK vs. TRU: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolARMKTRU
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.292.03
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.061.89
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)2.041.14
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)2.072.99

Growth

Revenue Growth

ARMK vs. TRU: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

ARMK vs. TRU: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

ARMK

1.04%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
5.88%
Q3
2.37%
Median
0.68%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

ARMK’s Dividend Yield of 1.04% is consistent with its peers in the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

TRU

0.50%

Professional Services Industry

Max
5.28%
Q3
2.51%
Median
1.63%
Q1
0.62%
Min
0.00%

TRU’s Dividend Yield of 0.50% is in the lower quartile for the Professional Services industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

ARMK vs. TRU: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

ARMK

29.94%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
127.31%
Q3
56.79%
Median
19.58%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

ARMK’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 29.94% is within the typical range for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

TRU

22.05%

Professional Services Industry

Max
109.23%
Q3
64.39%
Median
47.00%
Q1
20.35%
Min
0.00%

TRU’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 22.05% is within the typical range for the Professional Services industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

ARMK vs. TRU: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolARMKTRU
Dividend Yield (TTM)1.04%0.50%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)29.94%22.05%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

ARMK

28.69

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
59.44
Q3
33.98
Median
22.25
Q1
15.53
Min
7.61

ARMK’s P/E Ratio of 28.69 is within the middle range for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

TRU

43.69

Professional Services Industry

Max
49.59
Q3
36.59
Median
28.13
Q1
18.55
Min
10.07

A P/E Ratio of 43.69 places TRU in the upper quartile for the Professional Services industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

ARMK vs. TRU: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

ARMK

0.58

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
7.74
Q3
3.88
Median
2.05
Q1
1.19
Min
0.17

In the lower quartile for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, ARMK’s P/S Ratio of 0.58 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

TRU

3.93

Professional Services Industry

Max
9.54
Q3
5.11
Median
2.10
Q1
0.75
Min
0.11

TRU’s P/S Ratio of 3.93 aligns with the market consensus for the Professional Services industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

ARMK vs. TRU: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

ARMK

3.58

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
20.90
Q3
9.78
Median
4.29
Q1
2.22
Min
0.47

ARMK’s P/B Ratio of 3.58 is within the conventional range for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

TRU

3.80

Professional Services Industry

Max
13.75
Q3
8.87
Median
4.35
Q1
2.43
Min
0.54

TRU’s P/B Ratio of 3.80 is within the conventional range for the Professional Services industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

ARMK vs. TRU: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolARMKTRU
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)28.6943.69
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)0.583.93
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)3.583.80
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)9.6333.40