Seek Returns logo

ARMK vs. LTM: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at ARMK and LTM, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

ARMK is a standard domestic listing, while LTM trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors access to its foreign-listed shares.

SymbolARMKLTM
Company NameAramark--
CountryUnited StatesChile
GICS SectorConsumer DiscretionaryIndustrials
GICS IndustryHotels, Restaurants & LeisurePassenger Airlines
Market Capitalization10.53 billion USD13.74 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateDecember 12, 2013July 25, 2024
Security TypeCommon StockADR

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of ARMK and LTM by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

ARMK vs. LTM: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolARMKLTM
5-Day Price Return-3.09%6.05%
13-Week Price Return0.59%27.40%
26-Week Price Return4.22%42.67%
52-Week Price Return10.19%64.89%
Month-to-Date Return-7.24%2.96%
Year-to-Date Return5.82%59.50%
10-Day Avg. Volume2.69M2,100.86M
3-Month Avg. Volume1.95M1,815.43M
3-Month Volatility24.63%24.48%
Beta1.230.54

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

ARMK

11.83%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
83.01%
Q3
39.51%
Median
17.38%
Q1
5.32%
Min
-45.92%

ARMK’s Return on Equity of 11.83% is on par with the norm for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

LTM

141.28%

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max
49.96%
Q3
28.15%
Median
15.41%
Q1
8.29%
Min
-11.01%

LTM’s Return on Equity of 141.28% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Passenger Airlines industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

ARMK vs. LTM: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Passenger Airlines industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

ARMK

2.02%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
26.45%
Q3
14.67%
Median
8.69%
Q1
3.34%
Min
-11.30%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, ARMK’s Net Profit Margin of 2.02% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

LTM

8.88%

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max
17.65%
Q3
8.90%
Median
5.80%
Q1
2.02%
Min
-3.12%

LTM’s Net Profit Margin of 8.88% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Passenger Airlines industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

ARMK vs. LTM: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Passenger Airlines industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

ARMK

4.44%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
38.76%
Q3
21.15%
Median
14.20%
Q1
6.43%
Min
-14.56%

ARMK’s Operating Profit Margin of 4.44% is in the lower quartile for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

LTM

14.24%

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max
22.47%
Q3
12.33%
Median
8.62%
Q1
4.43%
Min
-2.88%

An Operating Profit Margin of 14.24% places LTM in the upper quartile for the Passenger Airlines industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

ARMK vs. LTM: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Passenger Airlines industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolARMKLTM
Return on Equity (TTM)11.83%141.28%
Return on Assets (TTM)2.77%7.44%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)2.02%8.88%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)4.44%14.24%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)8.55%27.19%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

ARMK

1.29

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
2.68
Q3
1.62
Median
1.11
Q1
0.74
Min
0.19

ARMK’s Current Ratio of 1.29 aligns with the median group of the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

LTM

0.60

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max
1.46
Q3
0.94
Median
0.76
Q1
0.54
Min
0.17

LTM’s Current Ratio of 0.60 aligns with the median group of the Passenger Airlines industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

ARMK vs. LTM: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Passenger Airlines industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

ARMK

2.04

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
9.88
Q3
4.54
Median
1.52
Q1
0.27
Min
0.00

ARMK’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 2.04 is typical for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

LTM

8.22

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max
9.80
Q3
4.82
Median
1.30
Q1
0.89
Min
0.00

LTM’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Passenger Airlines industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 8.22. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

ARMK vs. LTM: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Passenger Airlines industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

ARMK

2.07

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
26.88
Q3
11.95
Median
3.87
Q1
1.19
Min
-11.84

ARMK’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 2.07 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

LTM

2.97

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max
22.60
Q3
16.29
Median
6.75
Q1
1.94
Min
-8.55

LTM’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 2.97 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Passenger Airlines industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

ARMK vs. LTM: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Passenger Airlines industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolARMKLTM
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.290.60
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.060.53
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)2.048.22
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)2.072.97

Growth

Revenue Growth

ARMK vs. LTM: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

ARMK vs. LTM: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

ARMK

1.04%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
5.88%
Q3
2.37%
Median
0.68%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

ARMK’s Dividend Yield of 1.04% is consistent with its peers in the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

LTM

2.14%

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max
6.71%
Q3
3.95%
Median
1.10%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

LTM’s Dividend Yield of 2.14% is consistent with its peers in the Passenger Airlines industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

ARMK vs. LTM: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Passenger Airlines industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

ARMK

29.94%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
127.31%
Q3
56.79%
Median
19.58%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

ARMK’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 29.94% is within the typical range for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

LTM

49.16%

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max
71.59%
Q3
38.54%
Median
8.16%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

LTM’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 49.16% is in the upper quartile for the Passenger Airlines industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

ARMK vs. LTM: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Passenger Airlines industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolARMKLTM
Dividend Yield (TTM)1.04%2.14%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)29.94%49.16%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

ARMK

28.69

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
59.44
Q3
33.98
Median
22.25
Q1
15.53
Min
7.61

ARMK’s P/E Ratio of 28.69 is within the middle range for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

LTM

11.74

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max
13.29
Q3
11.94
Median
8.78
Q1
7.42
Min
3.07

LTM’s P/E Ratio of 11.74 is within the middle range for the Passenger Airlines industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

ARMK vs. LTM: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Passenger Airlines industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

ARMK

0.58

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
7.74
Q3
3.88
Median
2.05
Q1
1.19
Min
0.17

In the lower quartile for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, ARMK’s P/S Ratio of 0.58 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

LTM

1.04

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max
1.09
Q3
0.74
Median
0.61
Q1
0.44
Min
0.09

LTM’s P/S Ratio of 1.04 is in the upper echelon for the Passenger Airlines industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

ARMK vs. LTM: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Passenger Airlines industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

ARMK

3.58

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
20.90
Q3
9.78
Median
4.29
Q1
2.22
Min
0.47

ARMK’s P/B Ratio of 3.58 is within the conventional range for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

LTM

12.93

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max
3.44
Q3
2.89
Median
1.84
Q1
1.22
Min
0.56

At 12.93, LTM’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Passenger Airlines industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

ARMK vs. LTM: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Passenger Airlines industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolARMKLTM
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)28.6911.74
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)0.581.04
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)3.5812.93
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)9.6310.15