Seek Returns logo

ARMK vs. EME: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at ARMK and EME, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolARMKEME
Company NameAramarkEMCOR Group, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorConsumer DiscretionaryIndustrials
GICS IndustryHotels, Restaurants & LeisureConstruction & Engineering
Market Capitalization10.16 billion USD31.11 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateDecember 12, 2013January 10, 1995
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of ARMK and EME by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

ARMK vs. EME: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolARMKEME
5-Day Price Return0.34%5.26%
13-Week Price Return-10.10%27.23%
26-Week Price Return13.61%96.04%
52-Week Price Return3.68%57.83%
Month-to-Date Return0.63%7.00%
Year-to-Date Return3.56%53.12%
10-Day Avg. Volume1.92M0.40M
3-Month Avg. Volume1.96M0.53M
3-Month Volatility23.56%28.99%
Beta1.131.18

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

ARMK

11.83%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
84.03%
Q3
40.12%
Median
17.38%
Q1
7.45%
Min
-33.94%

ARMK’s Return on Equity of 11.83% is on par with the norm for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

EME

37.80%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
26.79%
Q3
16.47%
Median
10.66%
Q1
8.46%
Min
-1.86%

EME’s Return on Equity of 37.80% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Construction & Engineering industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

ARMK vs. EME: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

ARMK

2.02%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
25.61%
Q3
14.65%
Median
8.66%
Q1
3.36%
Min
-9.83%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, ARMK’s Net Profit Margin of 2.02% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

EME

7.07%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
11.67%
Q3
6.13%
Median
3.82%
Q1
2.31%
Min
-2.77%

A Net Profit Margin of 7.07% places EME in the upper quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

ARMK vs. EME: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

ARMK

4.44%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
45.80%
Q3
22.44%
Median
14.98%
Q1
6.59%
Min
-15.28%

ARMK’s Operating Profit Margin of 4.44% is in the lower quartile for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

EME

9.50%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
17.78%
Q3
9.61%
Median
6.19%
Q1
3.73%
Min
-1.78%

EME’s Operating Profit Margin of 9.50% is around the midpoint for the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

ARMK vs. EME: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolARMKEME
Return on Equity (TTM)11.83%37.80%
Return on Assets (TTM)2.77%14.03%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)2.02%7.07%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)4.44%9.50%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)8.55%19.49%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

ARMK

1.29

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
2.73
Q3
1.63
Median
1.12
Q1
0.73
Min
0.18

ARMK’s Current Ratio of 1.29 aligns with the median group of the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

EME

1.18

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
2.17
Q3
1.50
Median
1.23
Q1
1.00
Min
0.65

EME’s Current Ratio of 1.18 aligns with the median group of the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

ARMK vs. EME: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

ARMK

2.04

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
11.29
Q3
4.71
Median
1.65
Q1
0.27
Min
0.00

ARMK’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 2.04 is typical for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

EME

0.08

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
2.37
Q3
1.24
Median
0.62
Q1
0.31
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry, EME’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.08 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

ARMK vs. EME: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

ARMK

2.07

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
21.72
Q3
11.40
Median
4.02
Q1
1.19
Min
-11.84

ARMK’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 2.07 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

EME

490.27

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
36.37
Q3
17.88
Median
8.20
Q1
4.98
Min
-6.49

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 490.27, EME demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Construction & Engineering industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

ARMK vs. EME: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolARMKEME
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.291.18
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.061.13
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)2.040.08
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)2.07490.27

Growth

Revenue Growth

ARMK vs. EME: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

ARMK vs. EME: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

ARMK

1.07%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
6.81%
Q3
2.73%
Median
0.74%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

ARMK’s Dividend Yield of 1.07% is consistent with its peers in the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

EME

0.15%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
5.80%
Q3
3.33%
Median
2.22%
Q1
0.21%
Min
0.00%

EME’s Dividend Yield of 0.15% is in the lower quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

ARMK vs. EME: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

ARMK

29.94%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
128.39%
Q3
61.60%
Median
21.91%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

ARMK’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 29.94% is within the typical range for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

EME

4.14%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
139.17%
Q3
74.39%
Median
51.48%
Q1
15.67%
Min
0.00%

EME’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 4.14% is in the lower quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

ARMK vs. EME: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolARMKEME
Dividend Yield (TTM)1.07%0.15%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)29.94%4.14%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

ARMK

27.89

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
56.96
Q3
33.82
Median
21.30
Q1
15.75
Min
6.06

ARMK’s P/E Ratio of 27.89 is within the middle range for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

EME

27.87

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
41.00
Q3
26.91
Median
16.02
Q1
13.49
Min
1.65

A P/E Ratio of 27.87 places EME in the upper quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

ARMK vs. EME: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

ARMK

0.56

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
7.19
Q3
3.99
Median
1.93
Q1
1.26
Min
0.17

In the lower quartile for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, ARMK’s P/S Ratio of 0.56 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

EME

1.97

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
2.93
Q3
1.65
Median
0.71
Q1
0.45
Min
0.11

EME’s P/S Ratio of 1.97 is in the upper echelon for the Construction & Engineering industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

ARMK vs. EME: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

ARMK

3.58

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
24.89
Q3
11.60
Median
4.91
Q1
2.29
Min
0.37

ARMK’s P/B Ratio of 3.58 is within the conventional range for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

EME

7.85

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
7.96
Q3
4.06
Median
1.98
Q1
1.23
Min
0.24

EME’s P/B Ratio of 7.85 is in the upper tier for the Construction & Engineering industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

ARMK vs. EME: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolARMKEME
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)27.8927.87
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)0.561.97
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)3.587.85
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)9.3625.49