Seek Returns logo

ARMK vs. CSL: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at ARMK and CSL, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolARMKCSL
Company NameAramarkCarlisle Companies Incorporated
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorConsumer DiscretionaryIndustrials
GICS IndustryHotels, Restaurants & LeisureBuilding Products
Market Capitalization10.25 billion USD14.02 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateDecember 12, 2013February 21, 1973
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of ARMK and CSL by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

ARMK vs. CSL: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolARMKCSL
5-Day Price Return1.48%-1.80%
13-Week Price Return-8.86%-17.54%
26-Week Price Return12.98%-3.66%
52-Week Price Return1.99%-26.34%
Month-to-Date Return1.56%-0.28%
Year-to-Date Return4.53%-11.06%
10-Day Avg. Volume2.15M0.51M
3-Month Avg. Volume1.97M0.50M
3-Month Volatility23.44%43.77%
Beta1.130.97

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

ARMK

11.83%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
84.03%
Q3
40.12%
Median
17.38%
Q1
7.45%
Min
-33.94%

ARMK’s Return on Equity of 11.83% is on par with the norm for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

CSL

33.90%

Building Products Industry

Max
46.90%
Q3
27.60%
Median
15.43%
Q1
8.94%
Min
0.77%

In the upper quartile for the Building Products industry, CSL’s Return on Equity of 33.90% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

ARMK vs. CSL: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Building Products industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

ARMK

2.02%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
25.61%
Q3
14.65%
Median
8.66%
Q1
3.36%
Min
-9.83%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, ARMK’s Net Profit Margin of 2.02% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

CSL

16.12%

Building Products Industry

Max
19.42%
Q3
13.74%
Median
8.72%
Q1
4.81%
Min
0.46%

A Net Profit Margin of 16.12% places CSL in the upper quartile for the Building Products industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

ARMK vs. CSL: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Building Products industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

ARMK

4.44%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
45.80%
Q3
22.44%
Median
14.98%
Q1
6.59%
Min
-15.28%

ARMK’s Operating Profit Margin of 4.44% is in the lower quartile for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

CSL

21.17%

Building Products Industry

Max
26.72%
Q3
17.70%
Median
12.14%
Q1
9.54%
Min
1.65%

An Operating Profit Margin of 21.17% places CSL in the upper quartile for the Building Products industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

ARMK vs. CSL: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Building Products industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolARMKCSL
Return on Equity (TTM)11.83%33.90%
Return on Assets (TTM)2.77%13.86%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)2.02%16.12%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)4.44%21.17%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)8.55%36.92%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

ARMK

1.29

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
2.73
Q3
1.63
Median
1.12
Q1
0.73
Min
0.18

ARMK’s Current Ratio of 1.29 aligns with the median group of the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

CSL

2.19

Building Products Industry

Max
3.10
Q3
2.06
Median
1.60
Q1
1.30
Min
0.88

CSL’s Current Ratio of 2.19 is in the upper quartile for the Building Products industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

ARMK vs. CSL: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Building Products industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

ARMK

2.04

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
11.29
Q3
4.71
Median
1.65
Q1
0.27
Min
0.00

ARMK’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 2.04 is typical for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

CSL

0.89

Building Products Industry

Max
1.64
Q3
1.02
Median
0.62
Q1
0.20
Min
0.00

CSL’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.89 is typical for the Building Products industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

ARMK vs. CSL: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Building Products industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

ARMK

2.07

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
21.72
Q3
11.40
Median
4.02
Q1
1.19
Min
-11.84

ARMK’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 2.07 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

CSL

86.45

Building Products Industry

Max
72.12
Q3
34.39
Median
23.97
Q1
7.29
Min
2.97

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 86.45, CSL demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Building Products industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

ARMK vs. CSL: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Building Products industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolARMKCSL
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.292.19
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.061.47
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)2.040.89
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)2.0786.45

Growth

Revenue Growth

ARMK vs. CSL: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

ARMK vs. CSL: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

ARMK

1.07%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
6.81%
Q3
2.73%
Median
0.74%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

ARMK’s Dividend Yield of 1.07% is consistent with its peers in the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

CSL

1.26%

Building Products Industry

Max
2.51%
Q3
1.92%
Median
1.30%
Q1
0.78%
Min
0.00%

CSL’s Dividend Yield of 1.26% is consistent with its peers in the Building Products industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

ARMK vs. CSL: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Building Products industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

ARMK

29.94%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
128.39%
Q3
61.60%
Median
21.91%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

ARMK’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 29.94% is within the typical range for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

CSL

22.20%

Building Products Industry

Max
157.36%
Q3
76.90%
Median
30.70%
Q1
17.97%
Min
0.00%

CSL’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 22.20% is within the typical range for the Building Products industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

ARMK vs. CSL: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Building Products industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolARMKCSL
Dividend Yield (TTM)1.07%1.26%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)29.94%22.20%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

ARMK

27.99

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
56.96
Q3
33.82
Median
21.30
Q1
15.75
Min
6.06

ARMK’s P/E Ratio of 27.99 is within the middle range for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

CSL

17.56

Building Products Industry

Max
45.60
Q3
30.36
Median
21.97
Q1
17.37
Min
12.44

CSL’s P/E Ratio of 17.56 is within the middle range for the Building Products industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

ARMK vs. CSL: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Building Products industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

ARMK

0.57

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
7.19
Q3
3.99
Median
1.93
Q1
1.26
Min
0.17

In the lower quartile for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, ARMK’s P/S Ratio of 0.57 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

CSL

2.83

Building Products Industry

Max
5.90
Q3
3.09
Median
1.72
Q1
1.07
Min
0.37

CSL’s P/S Ratio of 2.83 aligns with the market consensus for the Building Products industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

ARMK vs. CSL: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Building Products industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

ARMK

3.58

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
24.89
Q3
11.60
Median
4.91
Q1
2.29
Min
0.37

ARMK’s P/B Ratio of 3.58 is within the conventional range for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

CSL

7.62

Building Products Industry

Max
10.99
Q3
5.69
Median
2.98
Q1
1.80
Min
0.66

CSL’s P/B Ratio of 7.62 is in the upper tier for the Building Products industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

ARMK vs. CSL: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Building Products industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolARMKCSL
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)27.9917.56
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)0.572.83
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)3.587.62
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)9.3915.98