Seek Returns logo

ARM vs. UBER: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at ARM and UBER, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

ARM trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors a convenient way to access its foreign-listed shares. In contrast, UBER is a standard domestic listing.

SymbolARMUBER
Company NameArm Holdings plcUber Technologies, Inc.
CountryUnited KingdomUnited States
GICS SectorInformation TechnologyIndustrials
GICS IndustrySemiconductors & Semiconductor EquipmentGround Transportation
Market Capitalization138.93 billion USD195.47 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNYSE
Listing DateSeptember 14, 2023May 10, 2019
Security TypeADRCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of ARM and UBER by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

ARM vs. UBER: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolARMUBER
5-Day Price Return-5.36%2.55%
13-Week Price Return-1.43%1.37%
26-Week Price Return-13.77%16.74%
52-Week Price Return2.85%26.35%
Month-to-Date Return-5.21%6.81%
Year-to-Date Return8.63%55.39%
10-Day Avg. Volume4.00M18.40M
3-Month Avg. Volume5.00M20.55M
3-Month Volatility46.58%29.59%
Beta2.731.49

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

ARM

10.64%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
52.74%
Q3
23.49%
Median
11.60%
Q1
3.23%
Min
-20.69%

ARM’s Return on Equity of 10.64% is on par with the norm for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

UBER

62.42%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
22.11%
Q3
13.84%
Median
9.66%
Q1
7.55%
Min
0.36%

UBER’s Return on Equity of 62.42% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Ground Transportation industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

ARM vs. UBER: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

ARM

16.96%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
44.17%
Q3
22.38%
Median
11.95%
Q1
3.21%
Min
-25.16%

ARM’s Net Profit Margin of 16.96% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

UBER

26.68%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
32.20%
Q3
18.59%
Median
7.11%
Q1
4.13%
Min
-10.38%

A Net Profit Margin of 26.68% places UBER in the upper quartile for the Ground Transportation industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

ARM vs. UBER: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

ARM

18.51%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
58.03%
Q3
27.84%
Median
12.45%
Q1
5.15%
Min
-28.61%

ARM’s Operating Profit Margin of 18.51% is around the midpoint for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

UBER

9.03%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
41.31%
Q3
23.16%
Median
11.33%
Q1
6.82%
Min
-12.08%

UBER’s Operating Profit Margin of 9.03% is around the midpoint for the Ground Transportation industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

ARM vs. UBER: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolARMUBER
Return on Equity (TTM)10.64%62.42%
Return on Assets (TTM)8.01%24.38%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)16.96%26.68%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)18.51%9.03%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)97.14%33.93%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

ARM

4.99

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
8.42
Q3
4.70
Median
2.75
Q1
2.07
Min
1.04

ARM’s Current Ratio of 4.99 is in the upper quartile for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

UBER

1.11

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
2.03
Q3
1.26
Median
0.89
Q1
0.73
Min
0.38

UBER’s Current Ratio of 1.11 aligns with the median group of the Ground Transportation industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

ARM vs. UBER: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

ARM

0.00

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
1.09
Q3
0.45
Median
0.22
Q1
0.01
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, ARM’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.00 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

UBER

0.42

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
2.51
Q3
1.51
Median
1.06
Q1
0.47
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Ground Transportation industry, UBER’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.42 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

ARM vs. UBER: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

ARM

6.95

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
174.00
Q3
81.10
Median
27.22
Q1
7.28
Min
-4.26

In the lower quartile for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, ARM’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 6.95 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

UBER

-0.24

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
51.07
Q3
22.54
Median
7.94
Q1
2.72
Min
-24.57

UBER has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -0.24. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

ARM vs. UBER: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolARMUBER
Current Ratio (MRQ)4.991.11
Quick Ratio (MRQ)4.770.97
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.000.42
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)6.95-0.24

Growth

Revenue Growth

ARM vs. UBER: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

ARM vs. UBER: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

ARM

0.00%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
4.16%
Q3
1.78%
Median
0.74%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

ARM currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

UBER

0.00%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
5.44%
Q3
2.49%
Median
1.53%
Q1
0.39%
Min
0.00%

UBER currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

ARM vs. UBER: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

ARM

0.00%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
196.12%
Q3
87.72%
Median
26.57%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

ARM has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

UBER

0.00%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
137.07%
Q3
74.71%
Median
41.16%
Q1
15.12%
Min
0.00%

UBER has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

ARM vs. UBER: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolARMUBER
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

ARM

203.03

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
109.37
Q3
57.11
Median
28.95
Q1
22.13
Min
11.14

At 203.03, ARM’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

UBER

15.49

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
42.59
Q3
24.86
Median
16.38
Q1
12.79
Min
4.37

UBER’s P/E Ratio of 15.49 is within the middle range for the Ground Transportation industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

ARM vs. UBER: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

ARM

34.44

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
16.09
Q3
10.10
Median
4.82
Q1
2.60
Min
0.93

With a P/S Ratio of 34.44, ARM trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

UBER

4.13

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
4.02
Q3
2.20
Median
1.23
Q1
0.87
Min
0.22

With a P/S Ratio of 4.13, UBER trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Ground Transportation industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

ARM vs. UBER: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

ARM

24.45

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
13.56
Q3
6.75
Median
3.68
Q1
1.89
Min
0.60

At 24.45, ARM’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

UBER

8.63

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
4.95
Q3
2.78
Median
1.38
Q1
1.17
Min
0.64

At 8.63, UBER’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Ground Transportation industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

ARM vs. UBER: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolARMUBER
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)203.0315.49
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)34.444.13
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)24.458.63
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)199.6022.90