Seek Returns logo

ARM vs. RBLX: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at ARM and RBLX, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Overview

ARM’s market capitalization of 163.93 billion USD is substantially larger than RBLX’s 70.26 billion USD, indicating a significant difference in their market valuations.

ARM’s beta of 4.10 points to significantly higher volatility compared to RBLX (beta: 1.56), suggesting ARM has greater potential for both gains and losses relative to market movements.

ARM trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors a convenient way to access its foreign-listed shares. In contrast, RBLX is a standard domestic listing.

SymbolARMRBLX
Company NameArm Holdings plc American Depositary SharesRoblox Corporation
CountryGBUS
SectorTechnologyTechnology
IndustrySemiconductorsElectronic Gaming & Multimedia
CEORene Anthony Andrada HaasDavid Baszucki
Price155.09 USD103.59 USD
Market Cap163.93 billion USD70.26 billion USD
Beta4.101.56
ExchangeNASDAQNYSE
IPO DateSeptember 14, 2023March 10, 2021
ADRYesNo

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of ARM and RBLX by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period.

Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

ARM vs. RBLX: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Profitability

Return on Equity

ARM

12.71%

Semiconductors Industry

Max
41.84%
Q3
15.81%
Median
6.31%
Q1
-5.54%
Min
-30.12%

ARM’s Return on Equity of 12.71% is on par with the norm for the Semiconductors industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

RBLX

-417.21%

Electronic Gaming & Multimedia Industry

Max
22.45%
Q3
13.61%
Median
-5.53%
Q1
-70.13%
Min
-121.78%

RBLX has a negative Return on Equity of -417.21%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

ARM vs. RBLX: A comparison of their ROE against their respective Semiconductors and Electronic Gaming & Multimedia industry benchmarks.

Return on Invested Capital

ARM

11.37%

Semiconductors Industry

Max
30.91%
Q3
11.34%
Median
4.08%
Q1
-2.17%
Min
-19.59%

In the upper quartile for the Semiconductors industry, ARM’s Return on Invested Capital of 11.37% signifies a highly effective use of its capital to generate profits when compared to its peers.

RBLX

-27.10%

Electronic Gaming & Multimedia Industry

Max
17.62%
Q3
11.24%
Median
1.98%
Q1
-22.67%
Min
-64.64%

RBLX has a negative Return on Invested Capital of -27.10%. This indicates that its operations are failing to generate a profit on the total capital invested, signaling significant inefficiency or value destruction.

ARM vs. RBLX: A comparison of their ROIC against their respective Semiconductors and Electronic Gaming & Multimedia industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin

ARM

19.77%

Semiconductors Industry

Max
51.69%
Q3
19.67%
Median
8.56%
Q1
-5.44%
Min
-38.60%

A Net Profit Margin of 19.77% places ARM in the upper quartile for the Semiconductors industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

RBLX

-22.94%

Electronic Gaming & Multimedia Industry

Max
28.20%
Q3
16.08%
Median
10.20%
Q1
-7.35%
Min
-22.94%

RBLX has a negative Net Profit Margin of -22.94%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

ARM vs. RBLX: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin against their respective Semiconductors and Electronic Gaming & Multimedia industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin

ARM

20.74%

Semiconductors Industry

Max
58.03%
Q3
22.12%
Median
8.40%
Q1
-3.73%
Min
-36.14%

ARM’s Operating Profit Margin of 20.74% is around the midpoint for the Semiconductors industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

RBLX

-26.48%

Electronic Gaming & Multimedia Industry

Max
28.10%
Q3
17.15%
Median
5.89%
Q1
-19.43%
Min
-26.48%

RBLX has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -26.48%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

ARM vs. RBLX: A comparison of their Operating Margin against their respective Semiconductors and Electronic Gaming & Multimedia industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolARMRBLX
Return on Equity (TTM)12.71%-417.21%
Return on Assets (TTM)8.87%-11.81%
Return on Invested Capital (TTM)11.37%-27.10%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)19.77%-22.94%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)20.74%-26.48%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)95.83%77.92%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio

ARM

5.20

Semiconductors Industry

Max
9.10
Q3
5.23
Median
3.09
Q1
2.49
Min
1.02

ARM’s Current Ratio of 5.20 aligns with the median group of the Semiconductors industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

RBLX

1.02

Electronic Gaming & Multimedia Industry

Max
3.22
Q3
2.77
Median
1.19
Q1
0.82
Min
0.01

RBLX’s Current Ratio of 1.02 aligns with the median group of the Electronic Gaming & Multimedia industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

ARM vs. RBLX: A comparison of their Current Ratio against their respective Semiconductors and Electronic Gaming & Multimedia industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio

ARM

0.05

Semiconductors Industry

Max
0.97
Q3
0.46
Median
0.21
Q1
0.05
Min
0.00

ARM’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.05 is typical for the Semiconductors industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

RBLX

5.81

Electronic Gaming & Multimedia Industry

Max
1.92
Q3
1.14
Median
0.31
Q1
0.17
Min
0.09

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 5.81, RBLX operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Electronic Gaming & Multimedia industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

ARM vs. RBLX: A comparison of their D/E Ratio against their respective Semiconductors and Electronic Gaming & Multimedia industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio

ARM

--

Semiconductors Industry

Max
36.25
Q3
29.12
Median
7.01
Q1
-1.22
Min
-18.18

Interest Coverage Ratio data for ARM is currently unavailable.

RBLX

-25.09

Electronic Gaming & Multimedia Industry

Max
20.61
Q3
4.69
Median
-1.31
Q1
-20.23
Min
-25.09

RBLX has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -25.09. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

ARM vs. RBLX: A comparison of their Interest Coverage against their respective Semiconductors and Electronic Gaming & Multimedia industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolARMRBLX
Current Ratio (TTM)5.201.02
Quick Ratio (TTM)5.201.02
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM)0.055.81
Debt-to-Asset Ratio (TTM)0.040.24
Net Debt-to-EBITDA Ratio (TTM)-2.31-1.05
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)---25.09

Growth

The following charts compare key year-over-year (YoY) growth metrics for ARM and RBLX. These metrics are based on the companies’ annual financial reports.

Revenue Growth

ARM vs. RBLX: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Revenue Growth.

Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth

ARM vs. RBLX: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth.

Free Cash Flow Growth

ARM vs. RBLX: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Free Cash Flow Growth.

Dividend

Dividend Yield

ARM

0.00%

Semiconductors Industry

Max
6.48%
Q3
0.93%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

ARM currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

RBLX

0.00%

Electronic Gaming & Multimedia Industry

Max
8.44%
Q3
0.36%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

RBLX currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

ARM vs. RBLX: A comparison of their Dividend Yield against their respective Semiconductors and Electronic Gaming & Multimedia industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio

ARM

0.00%

Semiconductors Industry

Max
204.29%
Q3
31.85%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

ARM has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

RBLX

0.00%

Electronic Gaming & Multimedia Industry

Max
106.44%
Q3
13.31%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

RBLX has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

ARM vs. RBLX: A comparison of their Payout Ratio against their respective Semiconductors and Electronic Gaming & Multimedia industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolARMRBLX
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio

ARM

206.59

Semiconductors Industry

Max
86.15
Q3
47.38
Median
27.87
Q1
18.89
Min
4.73

At 206.59, ARM’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Semiconductors industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

RBLX

-79.08

Electronic Gaming & Multimedia Industry

Max
36.87
Q3
20.95
Median
12.73
Q1
7.31
Min
3.67

RBLX has a negative P/E Ratio of -79.08. This occurs when a company has negative earnings (a net loss), making the ratio unsuitable for valuation analysis.

ARM vs. RBLX: A comparison of their P/E Ratio against their respective Semiconductors and Electronic Gaming & Multimedia industry benchmarks.

Forward P/E to Growth Ratio

ARM

7.75

Semiconductors Industry

Max
4.73
Q3
2.80
Median
1.11
Q1
0.68
Min
0.01

The Forward PEG Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric in the Semiconductors industry.

RBLX

1.72

Electronic Gaming & Multimedia Industry

Max
2.97
Q3
2.24
Median
1.87
Q1
1.76
Min
1.76

RBLX’s Forward PEG Ratio of 1.72 is below the typical range for the Electronic Gaming & Multimedia industry. This is a strong indicator that the stock may be undervalued, as its price appears low given its future growth prospects.

ARM vs. RBLX: A comparison of their Forward PEG Ratio against their respective Semiconductors and Electronic Gaming & Multimedia industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio

ARM

40.91

Semiconductors Industry

Max
21.96
Q3
10.21
Median
4.45
Q1
2.32
Min
0.48

With a P/S Ratio of 40.91, ARM trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Semiconductors industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

RBLX

18.32

Electronic Gaming & Multimedia Industry

Max
7.60
Q3
6.29
Median
3.76
Q1
1.02
Min
0.66

With a P/S Ratio of 18.32, RBLX trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Electronic Gaming & Multimedia industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

ARM vs. RBLX: A comparison of their P/S Ratio against their respective Semiconductors and Electronic Gaming & Multimedia industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio

ARM

23.92

Semiconductors Industry

Max
13.12
Q3
6.49
Median
3.31
Q1
1.74
Min
0.23

At 23.92, ARM’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Semiconductors industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

RBLX

223.95

Electronic Gaming & Multimedia Industry

Max
6.47
Q3
6.47
Median
4.48
Q1
1.29
Min
0.36

The P/B Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric for the Electronic Gaming & Multimedia industry.

ARM vs. RBLX: A comparison of their P/B Ratio against their respective Semiconductors and Electronic Gaming & Multimedia industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolARMRBLX
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM)206.59-79.08
Forward PEG Ratio (TTM)7.751.72
Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM)40.9118.32
Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM)23.92223.95
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM)1011.9180.12
EV-to-EBITDA (TTM)216.85-115.38
EV-to-Sales (TTM)40.4818.49