Seek Returns logo

ARM vs. IONQ: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at ARM and IONQ, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Overview

ARM’s market capitalization of 163.93 billion USD is substantially larger than IONQ’s 11.61 billion USD, indicating a significant difference in their market valuations.

ARM’s beta of 4.10 points to significantly higher volatility compared to IONQ (beta: 2.59), suggesting ARM has greater potential for both gains and losses relative to market movements.

ARM trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors a convenient way to access its foreign-listed shares. In contrast, IONQ is a standard domestic listing.

SymbolARMIONQ
Company NameArm Holdings plc American Depositary SharesIonQ, Inc.
CountryGBUS
SectorTechnologyTechnology
IndustrySemiconductorsComputer Hardware
CEORene Anthony Andrada HaasNiccolo Mcleod de Masi
Price155.09 USD44.39 USD
Market Cap163.93 billion USD11.61 billion USD
Beta4.102.59
ExchangeNASDAQNYSE
IPO DateSeptember 14, 2023January 4, 2021
ADRYesNo

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of ARM and IONQ by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period.

Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

ARM vs. IONQ: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Profitability

Return on Equity

ARM

12.71%

Semiconductors Industry

Max
41.84%
Q3
15.81%
Median
6.31%
Q1
-5.54%
Min
-30.12%

ARM’s Return on Equity of 12.71% is on par with the norm for the Semiconductors industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

IONQ

-63.35%

Computer Hardware Industry

Max
123.03%
Q3
15.78%
Median
-13.44%
Q1
-119.16%
Min
-227.95%

IONQ has a negative Return on Equity of -63.35%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

ARM vs. IONQ: A comparison of their ROE against their respective Semiconductors and Computer Hardware industry benchmarks.

Return on Invested Capital

ARM

11.37%

Semiconductors Industry

Max
30.91%
Q3
11.34%
Median
4.08%
Q1
-2.17%
Min
-19.59%

In the upper quartile for the Semiconductors industry, ARM’s Return on Invested Capital of 11.37% signifies a highly effective use of its capital to generate profits when compared to its peers.

IONQ

-31.70%

Computer Hardware Industry

Max
30.37%
Q3
20.44%
Median
7.03%
Q1
-12.47%
Min
-31.70%

IONQ has a negative Return on Invested Capital of -31.70%. This indicates that its operations are failing to generate a profit on the total capital invested, signaling significant inefficiency or value destruction.

ARM vs. IONQ: A comparison of their ROIC against their respective Semiconductors and Computer Hardware industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin

ARM

19.77%

Semiconductors Industry

Max
51.69%
Q3
19.67%
Median
8.56%
Q1
-5.44%
Min
-38.60%

A Net Profit Margin of 19.77% places ARM in the upper quartile for the Semiconductors industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

IONQ

-753.20%

Computer Hardware Industry

Max
40.72%
Q3
10.87%
Median
4.33%
Q1
-378.64%
Min
-753.20%

IONQ has a negative Net Profit Margin of -753.20%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

ARM vs. IONQ: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin against their respective Semiconductors and Computer Hardware industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin

ARM

20.74%

Semiconductors Industry

Max
58.03%
Q3
22.12%
Median
8.40%
Q1
-3.73%
Min
-36.14%

ARM’s Operating Profit Margin of 20.74% is around the midpoint for the Semiconductors industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

IONQ

-592.84%

Computer Hardware Industry

Max
42.27%
Q3
13.53%
Median
4.56%
Q1
-295.01%
Min
-592.84%

IONQ has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -592.84%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

ARM vs. IONQ: A comparison of their Operating Margin against their respective Semiconductors and Computer Hardware industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolARMIONQ
Return on Equity (TTM)12.71%-63.35%
Return on Assets (TTM)8.87%-38.15%
Return on Invested Capital (TTM)11.37%-31.70%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)19.77%-753.20%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)20.74%-592.84%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)95.83%50.07%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio

ARM

5.20

Semiconductors Industry

Max
9.10
Q3
5.23
Median
3.09
Q1
2.49
Min
1.02

ARM’s Current Ratio of 5.20 aligns with the median group of the Semiconductors industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

IONQ

13.17

Computer Hardware Industry

Max
20.73
Q3
11.54
Median
2.69
Q1
1.40
Min
0.73

IONQ’s Current Ratio of 13.17 is in the upper quartile for the Computer Hardware industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

ARM vs. IONQ: A comparison of their Current Ratio against their respective Semiconductors and Computer Hardware industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio

ARM

0.05

Semiconductors Industry

Max
0.97
Q3
0.46
Median
0.21
Q1
0.05
Min
0.00

ARM’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.05 is typical for the Semiconductors industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

IONQ

0.02

Computer Hardware Industry

Max
1.36
Q3
0.67
Median
0.04
Q1
0.03
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Computer Hardware industry, IONQ’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.02 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

ARM vs. IONQ: A comparison of their D/E Ratio against their respective Semiconductors and Computer Hardware industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio

ARM

--

Semiconductors Industry

Max
36.25
Q3
29.12
Median
7.01
Q1
-1.22
Min
-18.18

Interest Coverage Ratio data for ARM is currently unavailable.

IONQ

--

Computer Hardware Industry

Max
32.50
Q3
21.85
Median
4.98
Q1
-7.71
Min
-34.24

Interest Coverage Ratio data for IONQ is currently unavailable.

ARM vs. IONQ: A comparison of their Interest Coverage against their respective Semiconductors and Computer Hardware industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolARMIONQ
Current Ratio (TTM)5.2013.17
Quick Ratio (TTM)5.2012.67
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM)0.050.02
Debt-to-Asset Ratio (TTM)0.040.02
Net Debt-to-EBITDA Ratio (TTM)-2.310.61
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)----

Growth

The following charts compare key year-over-year (YoY) growth metrics for ARM and IONQ. These metrics are based on the companies’ annual financial reports.

Revenue Growth

ARM vs. IONQ: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Revenue Growth.

Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth

ARM vs. IONQ: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth.

Free Cash Flow Growth

ARM vs. IONQ: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Free Cash Flow Growth.

Dividend

Dividend Yield

ARM

0.00%

Semiconductors Industry

Max
6.48%
Q3
0.93%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

ARM currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

IONQ

0.00%

Computer Hardware Industry

Max
9.24%
Q3
1.58%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

IONQ currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

ARM vs. IONQ: A comparison of their Dividend Yield against their respective Semiconductors and Computer Hardware industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio

ARM

0.00%

Semiconductors Industry

Max
204.29%
Q3
31.85%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

ARM has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

IONQ

-0.01%

Computer Hardware Industry

Max
193.79%
Q3
30.72%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

IONQ has a negative Dividend Payout Ratio of -0.01%. This typically means the company paid a dividend despite reporting a net loss, a situation that may signal financial instability.

ARM vs. IONQ: A comparison of their Payout Ratio against their respective Semiconductors and Computer Hardware industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolARMIONQ
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%-0.01%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio

ARM

206.59

Semiconductors Industry

Max
86.15
Q3
47.38
Median
27.87
Q1
18.89
Min
4.73

At 206.59, ARM’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Semiconductors industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

IONQ

-31.31

Computer Hardware Industry

Max
24.60
Q3
24.01
Median
20.31
Q1
18.24
Min
13.38

IONQ has a negative P/E Ratio of -31.31. This occurs when a company has negative earnings (a net loss), making the ratio unsuitable for valuation analysis.

ARM vs. IONQ: A comparison of their P/E Ratio against their respective Semiconductors and Computer Hardware industry benchmarks.

Forward P/E to Growth Ratio

ARM

7.75

Semiconductors Industry

Max
4.73
Q3
2.80
Median
1.11
Q1
0.68
Min
0.01

The Forward PEG Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric in the Semiconductors industry.

IONQ

13.67

Computer Hardware Industry

Max
9.77
Q3
5.18
Median
1.77
Q1
1.17
Min
0.02

The Forward PEG Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric in the Computer Hardware industry.

ARM vs. IONQ: A comparison of their Forward PEG Ratio against their respective Semiconductors and Computer Hardware industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio

ARM

40.91

Semiconductors Industry

Max
21.96
Q3
10.21
Median
4.45
Q1
2.32
Min
0.48

With a P/S Ratio of 40.91, ARM trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Semiconductors industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

IONQ

269.73

Computer Hardware Industry

Max
57.61
Q3
47.40
Median
3.37
Q1
1.56
Min
0.43

With a P/S Ratio of 269.73, IONQ trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Computer Hardware industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

ARM vs. IONQ: A comparison of their P/S Ratio against their respective Semiconductors and Computer Hardware industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio

ARM

23.92

Semiconductors Industry

Max
13.12
Q3
6.49
Median
3.31
Q1
1.74
Min
0.23

At 23.92, ARM’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Semiconductors industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

IONQ

13.27

Computer Hardware Industry

Max
21.21
Q3
14.71
Median
9.28
Q1
3.74
Min
0.43

IONQ’s P/B Ratio of 13.27 is within the conventional range for the Computer Hardware industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

ARM vs. IONQ: A comparison of their P/B Ratio against their respective Semiconductors and Computer Hardware industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolARMIONQ
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM)206.59-31.31
Forward PEG Ratio (TTM)7.7513.67
Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM)40.91269.73
Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM)23.9213.27
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM)1011.91-59.29
EV-to-EBITDA (TTM)216.85-49.02
EV-to-Sales (TTM)40.48266.43