ARM vs. IONQ: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
UpdatedHere’s a clear look at ARM and IONQ, comparing key factors like performance, valuation metrics, dividends, and financial strength. It’s built for investors or anyone curious to see how these two stocks match up.
Company Overview
ARM dominates in value with a market cap of 137.89 billion USD, eclipsing IONQ’s 8.31 billion USD by roughly 16.59×.
ARM’s beta of 4.41 points to much larger expected swings compared to IONQ’s calmer 2.46, suggesting both higher upside and downside potential.
ARM trades as an ADR, giving U.S. investors a simple on-ramp to its foreign shares, while IONQ remains a standard domestic listing.
| Symbol | ARM | IONQ |
|---|---|---|
| Company Name | Arm Holdings plc American Depositary Shares | IonQ, Inc. |
| Country | GB | US |
| Sector | Technology | Technology |
| Industry | Semiconductors | Computer Hardware |
| CEO | Mr. Rene Anthony Andrada Haas | Mr. Niccolo Mcleod de Masi |
| Price | 130.45 USD | 33.54 USD |
| Market Cap | 137.89 billion USD | 8.31 billion USD |
| Beta | 4.41 | 2.46 |
| Exchange | NASDAQ | NYSE |
| IPO Date | September 14, 2023 | January 4, 2021 |
| ADR | Yes | No |
Performance Comparison
This chart compares the performance of ARM and IONQ over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).
Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.
Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Valuation Metrics Comparison
The section examines key financial ratios to assess the valuation of ARM and IONQ based on earnings, cash flow, sales, and book value. Pay attention to the following notable points where extreme values stand out.
- ARM trades at a lofty P/E of 170.26, implying strong growth expectations, in contrast to IONQ’s negative P/E of -23.66 driven by recent losses.
- IONQ reports a negative Price-to-Free Cash Flow ratio of -42.42, showing a cash flow shortfall that could threaten its operational sustainability, while ARM at 220.26 maintains positive cash flow.
| Symbol | ARM | IONQ |
|---|---|---|
| Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM) | 170.26 | -23.66 |
| Forward PEG Ratio (TTM) | 6.09 | 8.08 |
| Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM) | 37.33 | 193.01 |
| Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM) | 21.38 | 10.03 |
| Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM) | 220.26 | -42.42 |
| EV-to-EBITDA (TTM) | 221.33 | -34.91 |
| EV-to-Sales (TTM) | 36.85 | 189.71 |
| EV-to-Free Cash Flow (TTM) | 217.45 | -41.70 |
Dividend Comparison
Neither ARM nor IONQ currently pays a dividend yield; this often indicates they are reinvesting earnings for growth, prioritizing long-term expansion over immediate cash returns to shareholders.
| Symbol | ARM | IONQ |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financial Strength Metrics Comparison
This section dives into the financial resilience of ARM and IONQ, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.
- Neither ARM nor IONQ records interest coverage (both “--”), indicating virtually no interest expense—usually a sign of negligible debt.
| Symbol | ARM | IONQ |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (TTM) | 4.96 | 13.17 |
| Quick Ratio (TTM) | 4.96 | 12.67 |
| Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM) | 0.04 | 0.02 |
| Debt-to-Assets Ratio (TTM) | 0.03 | 0.02 |
| Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | -- | -- |