ARM vs. FOUR: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
UpdatedHere’s a clear look at ARM and FOUR, comparing key factors like performance, valuation metrics, dividends, and financial strength. It’s built for investors or anyone curious to see how these two stocks match up.
Company Overview
ARM dominates in value with a market cap of 137.89 billion USD, eclipsing FOUR’s 5.89 billion USD by roughly 23.40×.
ARM’s beta of 4.41 points to much larger expected swings compared to FOUR’s calmer 1.80, suggesting both higher upside and downside potential.
ARM trades as an ADR, giving U.S. investors a simple on-ramp to its foreign shares, while FOUR remains a standard domestic listing.
Symbol | ARM | FOUR |
---|---|---|
Company Name | Arm Holdings plc American Depositary Shares | Shift4 Payments, Inc. |
Country | GB | US |
Sector | Technology | Technology |
Industry | Semiconductors | Software - Infrastructure |
CEO | Mr. Rene Anthony Andrada Haas | Mr. Jared Isaacman |
Price | 130.45 USD | 87.34 USD |
Market Cap | 137.89 billion USD | 5.89 billion USD |
Beta | 4.41 | 1.80 |
Exchange | NASDAQ | NYSE |
IPO Date | September 14, 2023 | June 5, 2020 |
ADR | Yes | No |
Performance Comparison
This chart compares the performance of ARM and FOUR over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).
Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.
Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Valuation Metrics Comparison
The section examines key financial ratios to assess the valuation of ARM and FOUR based on earnings, cash flow, sales, and book value. Pay attention to the following notable points where extreme values stand out.
- ARM stands out with a premium P/E of 170.26, while FOUR at 27.08 remains within a more conventional earnings multiple.
Symbol | ARM | FOUR |
---|---|---|
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM) | 170.26 | 27.08 |
Forward PEG Ratio (TTM) | 6.09 | 1.65 |
Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM) | 37.33 | 1.70 |
Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM) | 21.38 | 7.34 |
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM) | 220.26 | 12.47 |
EV-to-EBITDA (TTM) | 221.33 | -20.81 |
EV-to-Sales (TTM) | 36.85 | 2.19 |
EV-to-Free Cash Flow (TTM) | 217.45 | 16.10 |
Dividend Comparison
Neither ARM nor FOUR currently pays a dividend yield; this often indicates they are reinvesting earnings for growth, prioritizing long-term expansion over immediate cash returns to shareholders.
Symbol | ARM | FOUR |
---|---|---|
Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financial Strength Metrics Comparison
This section dives into the financial resilience of ARM and FOUR, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.
- FOUR is highly leveraged (debt-to-equity ratio 3.58), elevating both potential gains and risks, compared to ARM at 0.04, which maintains a steadier capital structure.
- ARM shows “--” for interest coverage, hinting at negligible interest costs, whereas FOUR (at 3.05) covers its interest obligations.
Symbol | ARM | FOUR |
---|---|---|
Current Ratio (TTM) | 4.96 | 1.36 |
Quick Ratio (TTM) | 4.96 | 1.36 |
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM) | 0.04 | 3.58 |
Debt-to-Assets Ratio (TTM) | 0.03 | 0.58 |
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | -- | 3.05 |