ARES vs. USB: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
UpdatedHere’s a clear look at ARES and USB, comparing key factors like performance, valuation metrics, dividends, and financial strength. It’s built for investors or anyone curious to see how these two stocks match up.
Company Overview
USB stands out with 66.82 billion USD in market value—about 1.96× ARES’s market cap of 34.18 billion USD.
With betas of 1.42 for ARES and 0.99 for USB, both show similar volatility profiles relative to the overall market.
| Symbol | ARES | USB |
|---|---|---|
| Company Name | Ares Management Corporation | U.S. Bancorp |
| Country | US | US |
| Sector | Financial Services | Financial Services |
| Industry | Asset Management | Banks - Regional |
| CEO | Mr. Michael J. Arougheti | Ms. Gunjan Kedia |
| Price | 158.98 USD | 42.89 USD |
| Market Cap | 34.18 billion USD | 66.82 billion USD |
| Beta | 1.42 | 0.99 |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| IPO Date | May 2, 2014 | May 3, 1973 |
| ADR | No | No |
Performance Comparison
This chart compares the performance of ARES and USB over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).
Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.
Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Valuation Metrics Comparison
For a detailed comparison of valuation metrics between ARES and USB, please refer to the table below.
| Symbol | ARES | USB |
|---|---|---|
| Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM) | 64.72 | 10.00 |
| Forward PEG Ratio (TTM) | 2.92 | 0.97 |
| Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM) | 6.95 | 2.20 |
| Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM) | 7.47 | 1.11 |
| Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM) | 6.22 | 5.93 |
| EV-to-EBITDA (TTM) | 20.91 | 33.82 |
| EV-to-Sales (TTM) | 6.97 | 4.72 |
| EV-to-Free Cash Flow (TTM) | 6.23 | 12.76 |
Dividend Comparison
USB stands out with a 4.64% dividend yield—around 89% above ARES’s 2.46%—highlighting its emphasis on generous payouts.
| Symbol | ARES | USB |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 2.46% | 4.64% |
Financial Strength Metrics Comparison
This section dives into the financial resilience of ARES and USB, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.
- With current ratios of 0.90 and 0.00, both ARES and USB have less current assets than short-term liabilities, which could strain their working capital and force reliance on additional financing.
- USB posts a quick ratio of 0.00, indicating limited coverage of short-term debts from its most liquid assets—while ARES at 0.90 enjoys stronger liquidity resilience.
- USB’s low interest coverage (0.76) means it doesn't cover interest from operating earnings. ARES (at 1.95) meets its interest obligations.
| Symbol | ARES | USB |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (TTM) | 0.90 | 0.00 |
| Quick Ratio (TTM) | 0.90 | 0.00 |
| Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM) | 0.15 | 1.28 |
| Debt-to-Assets Ratio (TTM) | 0.03 | 0.11 |
| Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | 1.95 | 0.76 |