Seek Returns logo

ARES vs. RZB: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at ARES and RZB, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Overview

ARES’s market capitalization of 38.26 billion USD is substantially larger than RZB’s 13.07 billion USD, indicating a significant difference in their market valuations.

ARES’s beta of 1.40 points to significantly higher volatility compared to RZB (beta: 0.63), suggesting ARES has greater potential for both gains and losses relative to market movements.

SymbolARESRZB
Company NameAres Management CorporationReinsurance Group of America, Incorporated
CountryUSUS
SectorFinancial ServicesFinancial Services
IndustryAsset ManagementInsurance - Reinsurance
CEOMichael J. AroughetiTony Cheng
Price177.96 USD24.78 USD
Market Cap38.26 billion USD13.07 billion USD
Beta1.400.63
ExchangeNYSENYSE
IPO DateMay 2, 2014June 13, 2016
ADRNoNo

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of ARES and RZB by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period.

Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

ARES vs. RZB: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Profitability

Return on Equity

ARES

17.03%

Asset Management Industry

Max
34.25%
Q3
18.22%
Median
11.24%
Q1
5.81%
Min
-5.72%

ARES’s Return on Equity of 17.03% is on par with the norm for the Asset Management industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

RZB

7.36%

Insurance - Reinsurance Industry

Max
18.30%
Q3
14.16%
Median
8.39%
Q1
7.08%
Min
5.91%

RZB’s Return on Equity of 7.36% is on par with the norm for the Insurance - Reinsurance industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

ARES vs. RZB: A comparison of their ROE against their respective Asset Management and Insurance - Reinsurance industry benchmarks.

Return on Invested Capital

ARES

15.74%

Asset Management Industry

Max
42.18%
Q3
20.06%
Median
8.68%
Q1
3.13%
Min
-16.42%

ARES’s Return on Invested Capital of 15.74% is in line with the norm for the Asset Management industry, reflecting a standard level of efficiency in generating profits from its capital base.

RZB

0.62%

Insurance - Reinsurance Industry

Max
126.30%
Q3
60.66%
Median
7.25%
Q1
3.18%
Min
0.62%

Return on Invested Capital is often not a primary measure of capital efficiency in the Insurance - Reinsurance industry.

ARES vs. RZB: A comparison of their ROIC against their respective Asset Management and Insurance - Reinsurance industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin

ARES

10.46%

Asset Management Industry

Max
91.66%
Q3
57.81%
Median
29.48%
Q1
15.70%
Min
-27.65%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Asset Management industry, ARES’s Net Profit Margin of 10.46% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

RZB

3.77%

Insurance - Reinsurance Industry

Max
21.27%
Q3
12.90%
Median
9.40%
Q1
5.62%
Min
3.77%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Insurance - Reinsurance industry, RZB’s Net Profit Margin of 3.77% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

ARES vs. RZB: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin against their respective Asset Management and Insurance - Reinsurance industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin

ARES

27.62%

Asset Management Industry

Max
99.76%
Q3
78.28%
Median
34.76%
Q1
21.75%
Min
-48.25%

ARES’s Operating Profit Margin of 27.62% is around the midpoint for the Asset Management industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

RZB

5.12%

Insurance - Reinsurance Industry

Max
17.83%
Q3
15.41%
Median
8.11%
Q1
5.86%
Min
4.12%

RZB’s Operating Profit Margin of 5.12% is in the lower quartile for the Insurance - Reinsurance industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

ARES vs. RZB: A comparison of their Operating Margin against their respective Asset Management and Insurance - Reinsurance industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolARESRZB
Return on Equity (TTM)17.03%7.36%
Return on Assets (TTM)1.89%0.62%
Return on Invested Capital (TTM)15.74%0.62%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)10.46%3.77%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)27.62%5.12%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)60.51%73.13%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio

ARES

0.90

Asset Management Industry

Max
12.44
Q3
5.76
Median
3.04
Q1
1.03
Min
0.01

ARES’s Current Ratio of 0.90 falls into the lower quartile for the Asset Management industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

RZB

--

Insurance - Reinsurance Industry

Max
--
Q3
--
Median
--
Q1
--
Min
--

Current Ratio data for RZB is currently unavailable.

ARES vs. RZB: A comparison of their Current Ratio against their respective Asset Management and Insurance - Reinsurance industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio

ARES

0.15

Asset Management Industry

Max
2.62
Q3
1.42
Median
0.76
Q1
0.34
Min
0.01

Falling into the lower quartile for the Asset Management industry, ARES’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.15 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

RZB

0.50

Insurance - Reinsurance Industry

Max
--
Q3
--
Median
--
Q1
--
Min
--

RZB has a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.50, but industry benchmarks for the Insurance - Reinsurance sector are currently unavailable for comparison.

ARES vs. RZB: A comparison of their D/E Ratio against their respective Asset Management and Insurance - Reinsurance industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio

ARES

1.95

Asset Management Industry

Max
13.30
Q3
6.30
Median
2.71
Q1
1.00
Min
-6.91

ARES’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 1.95 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Asset Management industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

RZB

3.41

Insurance - Reinsurance Industry

Max
22.46
Q3
18.27
Median
5.57
Q1
4.93
Min
3.41

In the lower quartile for the Insurance - Reinsurance industry, RZB’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 3.41 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

ARES vs. RZB: A comparison of their Interest Coverage against their respective Asset Management and Insurance - Reinsurance industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolARESRZB
Current Ratio (TTM)0.90--
Quick Ratio (TTM)0.90--
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM)0.150.50
Debt-to-Asset Ratio (TTM)0.030.04
Net Debt-to-EBITDA Ratio (TTM)0.040.54
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)1.953.41

Growth

The following charts compare key year-over-year (YoY) growth metrics for ARES and RZB. These metrics are based on the companies’ annual financial reports.

Revenue Growth

ARES vs. RZB: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Revenue Growth.

Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth

ARES vs. RZB: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth.

Free Cash Flow Growth

ARES vs. RZB: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Free Cash Flow Growth.

Dividend

Dividend Yield

ARES

2.30%

Asset Management Industry

Max
26.09%
Q3
11.60%
Median
6.37%
Q1
2.75%
Min
0.00%

ARES’s Dividend Yield of 2.30% is in the lower quartile for the Asset Management industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

RZB

1.80%

Insurance - Reinsurance Industry

Max
2.38%
Q3
1.52%
Median
0.33%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 1.80%, RZB offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Insurance - Reinsurance industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

ARES vs. RZB: A comparison of their Dividend Yield against their respective Asset Management and Insurance - Reinsurance industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio

ARES

323.36%

Asset Management Industry

Max
1,034.88%
Q3
127.70%
Median
75.15%
Q1
34.21%
Min
0.00%

ARES’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 323.36% is above 100%. This means the company is paying out more in dividends than it earned, a practice that is often unsustainable and could indicate a risk to future dividend stability.

RZB

29.26%

Insurance - Reinsurance Industry

Max
40.35%
Q3
23.76%
Median
7.09%
Q1
1.73%
Min
0.00%

RZB’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 29.26% is in the upper quartile for the Insurance - Reinsurance industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

ARES vs. RZB: A comparison of their Payout Ratio against their respective Asset Management and Insurance - Reinsurance industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolARESRZB
Dividend Yield (TTM)2.30%1.80%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)323.36%29.26%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio

ARES

72.45

Asset Management Industry

Max
38.72
Q3
23.40
Median
11.45
Q1
8.80
Min
1.54

At 72.45, ARES’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Asset Management industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

RZB

16.46

Insurance - Reinsurance Industry

Max
16.92
Q3
16.06
Median
12.86
Q1
8.23
Min
5.12

A P/E Ratio of 16.46 places RZB in the upper quartile for the Insurance - Reinsurance industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

ARES vs. RZB: A comparison of their P/E Ratio against their respective Asset Management and Insurance - Reinsurance industry benchmarks.

Forward P/E to Growth Ratio

ARES

3.26

Asset Management Industry

Max
6.38
Q3
3.23
Median
1.55
Q1
0.89
Min
0.02

A Forward PEG Ratio of 3.26 places ARES in the upper quartile for the Asset Management industry. This suggests the stock is potentially expensive compared to its peers relative to its growth forecast, which may warrant caution.

RZB

1.52

Insurance - Reinsurance Industry

Max
1.52
Q3
1.04
Median
0.71
Q1
0.38
Min
0.20

RZB’s Forward PEG Ratio of 1.52 is exceptionally high for the Insurance - Reinsurance industry. This suggests its stock price is very high relative to its expected earnings growth, signaling significant overvaluation risk.

ARES vs. RZB: A comparison of their Forward PEG Ratio against their respective Asset Management and Insurance - Reinsurance industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio

ARES

7.78

Asset Management Industry

Max
13.75
Q3
7.92
Median
4.87
Q1
3.51
Min
0.02

ARES’s P/S Ratio of 7.78 aligns with the market consensus for the Asset Management industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

RZB

0.62

Insurance - Reinsurance Industry

Max
1.18
Q3
1.07
Median
0.91
Q1
0.83
Min
0.62

The P/S Ratio is often not a primary valuation tool in the Insurance - Reinsurance industry.

ARES vs. RZB: A comparison of their P/S Ratio against their respective Asset Management and Insurance - Reinsurance industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio

ARES

8.36

Asset Management Industry

Max
5.33
Q3
2.75
Median
1.06
Q1
0.87
Min
0.00

The P/B Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric for the Asset Management industry.

RZB

1.15

Insurance - Reinsurance Industry

Max
1.19
Q3
1.18
Median
1.08
Q1
0.93
Min
0.73

RZB’s P/B Ratio of 1.15 is within the conventional range for the Insurance - Reinsurance industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

ARES vs. RZB: A comparison of their P/B Ratio against their respective Asset Management and Insurance - Reinsurance industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolARESRZB
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM)72.4516.46
Forward PEG Ratio (TTM)3.261.52
Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM)7.780.62
Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM)8.361.15
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM)6.962.58
EV-to-EBITDA (TTM)23.4012.68
EV-to-Sales (TTM)7.800.65