ARES vs. MET: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
UpdatedHere’s a clear look at ARES and MET, comparing key factors like performance, valuation metrics, dividends, and financial strength. It’s built for investors or anyone curious to see how these two stocks match up.
Company Overview
MET stands out with 52.29 billion USD in market value—about 1.53× ARES’s market cap of 34.18 billion USD.
ARES’s beta of 1.42 points to much larger expected swings compared to MET’s calmer 0.83, suggesting both higher upside and downside potential.
| Symbol | ARES | MET |
|---|---|---|
| Company Name | Ares Management Corporation | MetLife, Inc. |
| Country | US | US |
| Sector | Financial Services | Financial Services |
| Industry | Asset Management | Insurance - Life |
| CEO | Mr. Michael J. Arougheti | Mr. Michel Abbas Khalaf |
| Price | 158.98 USD | 77.9 USD |
| Market Cap | 34.18 billion USD | 52.29 billion USD |
| Beta | 1.42 | 0.83 |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| IPO Date | May 2, 2014 | April 5, 2000 |
| ADR | No | No |
Performance Comparison
This chart compares the performance of ARES and MET over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).
Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.
Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Valuation Metrics Comparison
For a detailed comparison of valuation metrics between ARES and MET, please refer to the table below.
| Symbol | ARES | MET |
|---|---|---|
| Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM) | 64.72 | 12.22 |
| Forward PEG Ratio (TTM) | 2.92 | 1.06 |
| Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM) | 6.95 | 0.72 |
| Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM) | 7.47 | 2.00 |
| Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM) | 6.22 | 3.16 |
| EV-to-EBITDA (TTM) | 20.91 | 15.63 |
| EV-to-Sales (TTM) | 6.97 | 0.63 |
| EV-to-Free Cash Flow (TTM) | 6.23 | 2.79 |
Dividend Comparison
Both ARES and MET offer similar dividend yields (2.46% vs. 2.83%), indicating comparable approaches to balancing income and growth.
| Symbol | ARES | MET |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 2.46% | 2.83% |
Financial Strength Metrics Comparison
This section dives into the financial resilience of ARES and MET, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.
- ARES’s current ratio of 0.90 signals a possible liquidity squeeze, while MET at 821.68 comfortably covers its short-term obligations.
| Symbol | ARES | MET |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (TTM) | 0.90 | 821.68 |
| Quick Ratio (TTM) | 0.90 | 821.68 |
| Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM) | 0.15 | 0.55 |
| Debt-to-Assets Ratio (TTM) | 0.03 | 0.02 |
| Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | 1.95 | 4.94 |