ARES vs. HIG: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
UpdatedHere’s a clear look at ARES and HIG, comparing key factors like performance, valuation metrics, dividends, and financial strength. It’s built for investors or anyone curious to see how these two stocks match up.
Company Overview
With ARES at 34.18 billion USD and HIG at 36.83 billion USD, their market capitalizations sit in the same ballpark.
ARES’s beta of 1.42 points to much larger expected swings compared to HIG’s calmer 0.69, suggesting both higher upside and downside potential.
| Symbol | ARES | HIG |
|---|---|---|
| Company Name | Ares Management Corporation | The Hartford Financial Services Group, Inc. |
| Country | US | US |
| Sector | Financial Services | Financial Services |
| Industry | Asset Management | Insurance - Diversified |
| CEO | Mr. Michael J. Arougheti | Mr. Christopher Jerome Swift CPA |
| Price | 158.98 USD | 129.62 USD |
| Market Cap | 34.18 billion USD | 36.83 billion USD |
| Beta | 1.42 | 0.69 |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| IPO Date | May 2, 2014 | December 15, 1995 |
| ADR | No | No |
Performance Comparison
This chart compares the performance of ARES and HIG over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).
Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.
Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Valuation Metrics Comparison
For a detailed comparison of valuation metrics between ARES and HIG, please refer to the table below.
| Symbol | ARES | HIG |
|---|---|---|
| Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM) | 64.72 | 12.43 |
| Forward PEG Ratio (TTM) | 2.92 | 0.87 |
| Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM) | 6.95 | 1.38 |
| Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM) | 7.47 | 2.21 |
| Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM) | 6.22 | 6.50 |
| EV-to-EBITDA (TTM) | 20.91 | 10.82 |
| EV-to-Sales (TTM) | 6.97 | 1.53 |
| EV-to-Free Cash Flow (TTM) | 6.23 | 7.25 |
Dividend Comparison
ARES’s dividend yield of 2.46% is about 61% higher than HIG’s 1.53%, underscoring its stronger focus on returning cash to shareholders.
| Symbol | ARES | HIG |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 2.46% | 1.53% |
Financial Strength Metrics Comparison
This section dives into the financial resilience of ARES and HIG, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.
- With current ratios of 0.90 and 0.00, both ARES and HIG have less current assets than short-term liabilities, which could strain their working capital and force reliance on additional financing.
- HIG posts a quick ratio of 0.00, indicating limited coverage of short-term debts from its most liquid assets—while ARES at 0.90 enjoys stronger liquidity resilience.
| Symbol | ARES | HIG |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (TTM) | 0.90 | 0.00 |
| Quick Ratio (TTM) | 0.90 | 0.00 |
| Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM) | 0.15 | 0.26 |
| Debt-to-Assets Ratio (TTM) | 0.03 | 0.05 |
| Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | 1.95 | 19.48 |