Seek Returns logo

ARES vs. CINF: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at ARES and CINF, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Overview

ARES’s market capitalization of 38.26 billion USD is substantially larger than CINF’s 23.23 billion USD, indicating a significant difference in their market valuations.

ARES’s beta of 1.40 points to significantly higher volatility compared to CINF (beta: 0.79), suggesting ARES has greater potential for both gains and losses relative to market movements.

SymbolARESCINF
Company NameAres Management CorporationCincinnati Financial Corporation
CountryUSUS
SectorFinancial ServicesFinancial Services
IndustryAsset ManagementInsurance - Property & Casualty
CEOMichael J. AroughetiStephen Michael Spray
Price177.96 USD148.59 USD
Market Cap38.26 billion USD23.23 billion USD
Beta1.400.79
ExchangeNYSENASDAQ
IPO DateMay 2, 2014March 17, 1980
ADRNoNo

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of ARES and CINF by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period.

Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

ARES vs. CINF: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Profitability

Return on Equity

ARES

17.03%

Asset Management Industry

Max
34.25%
Q3
18.22%
Median
11.24%
Q1
5.81%
Min
-5.72%

ARES’s Return on Equity of 17.03% is on par with the norm for the Asset Management industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

CINF

10.67%

Insurance - Property & Casualty Industry

Max
28.14%
Q3
17.51%
Median
12.75%
Q1
8.26%
Min
0.61%

CINF’s Return on Equity of 10.67% is on par with the norm for the Insurance - Property & Casualty industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

ARES vs. CINF: A comparison of their ROE against their respective Asset Management and Insurance - Property & Casualty industry benchmarks.

Return on Invested Capital

ARES

15.74%

Asset Management Industry

Max
42.18%
Q3
20.06%
Median
8.68%
Q1
3.13%
Min
-16.42%

ARES’s Return on Invested Capital of 15.74% is in line with the norm for the Asset Management industry, reflecting a standard level of efficiency in generating profits from its capital base.

CINF

144.40%

Insurance - Property & Casualty Industry

Max
21.89%
Q3
10.09%
Median
3.90%
Q1
0.89%
Min
-7.26%

Return on Invested Capital is often not a primary measure of capital efficiency in the Insurance - Property & Casualty industry.

ARES vs. CINF: A comparison of their ROIC against their respective Asset Management and Insurance - Property & Casualty industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin

ARES

10.46%

Asset Management Industry

Max
91.66%
Q3
57.81%
Median
29.48%
Q1
15.70%
Min
-27.65%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Asset Management industry, ARES’s Net Profit Margin of 10.46% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

CINF

13.19%

Insurance - Property & Casualty Industry

Max
21.98%
Q3
13.09%
Median
9.18%
Q1
6.10%
Min
2.13%

A Net Profit Margin of 13.19% places CINF in the upper quartile for the Insurance - Property & Casualty industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

ARES vs. CINF: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin against their respective Asset Management and Insurance - Property & Casualty industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin

ARES

27.62%

Asset Management Industry

Max
99.76%
Q3
78.28%
Median
34.76%
Q1
21.75%
Min
-48.25%

ARES’s Operating Profit Margin of 27.62% is around the midpoint for the Asset Management industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

CINF

16.33%

Insurance - Property & Casualty Industry

Max
31.70%
Q3
17.32%
Median
12.57%
Q1
7.38%
Min
4.31%

CINF’s Operating Profit Margin of 16.33% is around the midpoint for the Insurance - Property & Casualty industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

ARES vs. CINF: A comparison of their Operating Margin against their respective Asset Management and Insurance - Property & Casualty industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolARESCINF
Return on Equity (TTM)17.03%10.67%
Return on Assets (TTM)1.89%3.88%
Return on Invested Capital (TTM)15.74%144.40%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)10.46%13.19%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)27.62%16.33%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)60.51%100.00%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio

ARES

0.90

Asset Management Industry

Max
12.44
Q3
5.76
Median
3.04
Q1
1.03
Min
0.01

ARES’s Current Ratio of 0.90 falls into the lower quartile for the Asset Management industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

CINF

40.40

Insurance - Property & Casualty Industry

Max
51.52
Q3
30.84
Median
20.50
Q1
6.61
Min
0.41

CINF’s Current Ratio of 40.40 is in the upper quartile for the Insurance - Property & Casualty industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

ARES vs. CINF: A comparison of their Current Ratio against their respective Asset Management and Insurance - Property & Casualty industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio

ARES

0.15

Asset Management Industry

Max
2.62
Q3
1.42
Median
0.76
Q1
0.34
Min
0.01

Falling into the lower quartile for the Asset Management industry, ARES’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.15 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

CINF

0.06

Insurance - Property & Casualty Industry

Max
0.58
Q3
0.36
Median
0.27
Q1
0.14
Min
0.01

Falling into the lower quartile for the Insurance - Property & Casualty industry, CINF’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.06 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

ARES vs. CINF: A comparison of their D/E Ratio against their respective Asset Management and Insurance - Property & Casualty industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio

ARES

1.95

Asset Management Industry

Max
13.30
Q3
6.30
Median
2.71
Q1
1.00
Min
-6.91

ARES’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 1.95 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Asset Management industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

CINF

33.79

Insurance - Property & Casualty Industry

Max
39.40
Q3
22.24
Median
12.38
Q1
6.68
Min
-12.40

CINF’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 33.79 is in the upper quartile for the Insurance - Property & Casualty industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

ARES vs. CINF: A comparison of their Interest Coverage against their respective Asset Management and Insurance - Property & Casualty industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolARESCINF
Current Ratio (TTM)0.9040.40
Quick Ratio (TTM)0.9040.40
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM)0.150.06
Debt-to-Asset Ratio (TTM)0.030.02
Net Debt-to-EBITDA Ratio (TTM)0.04-0.07
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)1.9533.79

Growth

The following charts compare key year-over-year (YoY) growth metrics for ARES and CINF. These metrics are based on the companies’ annual financial reports.

Revenue Growth

ARES vs. CINF: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Revenue Growth.

Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth

ARES vs. CINF: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth.

Free Cash Flow Growth

ARES vs. CINF: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Free Cash Flow Growth.

Dividend

Dividend Yield

ARES

2.30%

Asset Management Industry

Max
26.09%
Q3
11.60%
Median
6.37%
Q1
2.75%
Min
0.00%

ARES’s Dividend Yield of 2.30% is in the lower quartile for the Asset Management industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

CINF

2.26%

Insurance - Property & Casualty Industry

Max
8.17%
Q3
3.10%
Median
1.79%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

CINF’s Dividend Yield of 2.26% is consistent with its peers in the Insurance - Property & Casualty industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

ARES vs. CINF: A comparison of their Dividend Yield against their respective Asset Management and Insurance - Property & Casualty industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio

ARES

323.36%

Asset Management Industry

Max
1,034.88%
Q3
127.70%
Median
75.15%
Q1
34.21%
Min
0.00%

ARES’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 323.36% is above 100%. This means the company is paying out more in dividends than it earned, a practice that is often unsustainable and could indicate a risk to future dividend stability.

CINF

34.49%

Insurance - Property & Casualty Industry

Max
115.20%
Q3
35.27%
Median
22.19%
Q1
3.16%
Min
0.00%

CINF’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 34.49% is within the typical range for the Insurance - Property & Casualty industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

ARES vs. CINF: A comparison of their Payout Ratio against their respective Asset Management and Insurance - Property & Casualty industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolARESCINF
Dividend Yield (TTM)2.30%2.26%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)323.36%34.49%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio

ARES

72.45

Asset Management Industry

Max
38.72
Q3
23.40
Median
11.45
Q1
8.80
Min
1.54

At 72.45, ARES’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Asset Management industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

CINF

16.06

Insurance - Property & Casualty Industry

Max
35.83
Q3
23.28
Median
14.49
Q1
11.91
Min
4.47

CINF’s P/E Ratio of 16.06 is within the middle range for the Insurance - Property & Casualty industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

ARES vs. CINF: A comparison of their P/E Ratio against their respective Asset Management and Insurance - Property & Casualty industry benchmarks.

Forward P/E to Growth Ratio

ARES

3.26

Asset Management Industry

Max
6.38
Q3
3.23
Median
1.55
Q1
0.89
Min
0.02

A Forward PEG Ratio of 3.26 places ARES in the upper quartile for the Asset Management industry. This suggests the stock is potentially expensive compared to its peers relative to its growth forecast, which may warrant caution.

CINF

0.78

Insurance - Property & Casualty Industry

Max
2.53
Q3
1.90
Median
1.33
Q1
0.86
Min
0.01

In the lower quartile for the Insurance - Property & Casualty industry, CINF’s Forward PEG Ratio of 0.78 is a positive indicator. It suggests that the stock may be attractively valued relative to its expected earnings growth.

ARES vs. CINF: A comparison of their Forward PEG Ratio against their respective Asset Management and Insurance - Property & Casualty industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio

ARES

7.78

Asset Management Industry

Max
13.75
Q3
7.92
Median
4.87
Q1
3.51
Min
0.02

ARES’s P/S Ratio of 7.78 aligns with the market consensus for the Asset Management industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

CINF

2.12

Insurance - Property & Casualty Industry

Max
3.76
Q3
2.39
Median
1.80
Q1
1.01
Min
0.50

The P/S Ratio is often not a primary valuation tool in the Insurance - Property & Casualty industry.

ARES vs. CINF: A comparison of their P/S Ratio against their respective Asset Management and Insurance - Property & Casualty industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio

ARES

8.36

Asset Management Industry

Max
5.33
Q3
2.75
Median
1.06
Q1
0.87
Min
0.00

The P/B Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric for the Asset Management industry.

CINF

1.69

Insurance - Property & Casualty Industry

Max
5.34
Q3
2.95
Median
1.92
Q1
1.31
Min
0.52

CINF’s P/B Ratio of 1.69 is within the conventional range for the Insurance - Property & Casualty industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

ARES vs. CINF: A comparison of their P/B Ratio against their respective Asset Management and Insurance - Property & Casualty industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolARESCINF
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM)72.4516.06
Forward PEG Ratio (TTM)3.260.78
Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM)7.782.12
Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM)8.361.69
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM)6.968.97
EV-to-EBITDA (TTM)23.4011.70
EV-to-Sales (TTM)7.802.11