ARES vs. CB: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
UpdatedHere’s a clear look at ARES and CB, comparing key factors like performance, valuation metrics, dividends, and financial strength. It’s built for investors or anyone curious to see how these two stocks match up.
Company Overview
CB stands out with 116.38 billion USD in market value—about 3.41× ARES’s market cap of 34.18 billion USD.
ARES’s beta of 1.42 points to much larger expected swings compared to CB’s calmer 0.58, suggesting both higher upside and downside potential.
Symbol | ARES | CB |
---|---|---|
Company Name | Ares Management Corporation | Chubb Limited |
Country | US | CH |
Sector | Financial Services | Financial Services |
Industry | Asset Management | Insurance - Property & Casualty |
CEO | Mr. Michael J. Arougheti | Mr. Evan G. Greenberg |
Price | 158.98 USD | 290.42 USD |
Market Cap | 34.18 billion USD | 116.38 billion USD |
Beta | 1.42 | 0.58 |
Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
IPO Date | May 2, 2014 | March 25, 1993 |
ADR | No | No |
Performance Comparison
This chart compares the performance of ARES and CB over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).
Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.
Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Valuation Metrics Comparison
For a detailed comparison of valuation metrics between ARES and CB, please refer to the table below.
Symbol | ARES | CB |
---|---|---|
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM) | 64.72 | 13.88 |
Forward PEG Ratio (TTM) | 2.92 | 0.97 |
Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM) | 6.95 | 2.07 |
Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM) | 7.47 | 1.79 |
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM) | 6.22 | 8.01 |
EV-to-EBITDA (TTM) | 20.91 | 15.96 |
EV-to-Sales (TTM) | 6.97 | 2.32 |
EV-to-Free Cash Flow (TTM) | 6.23 | 9.01 |
Dividend Comparison
ARES’s dividend yield of 2.46% is about 96% higher than CB’s 1.25%, underscoring its stronger focus on returning cash to shareholders.
Symbol | ARES | CB |
---|---|---|
Dividend Yield (TTM) | 2.46% | 1.25% |
Financial Strength Metrics Comparison
This section dives into the financial resilience of ARES and CB, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.
- With current ratios of 0.90 and 0.00, both ARES and CB have less current assets than short-term liabilities, which could strain their working capital and force reliance on additional financing.
- CB posts a quick ratio of 0.00, indicating limited coverage of short-term debts from its most liquid assets—while ARES at 0.90 enjoys stronger liquidity resilience.
Symbol | ARES | CB |
---|---|---|
Current Ratio (TTM) | 0.90 | 0.00 |
Quick Ratio (TTM) | 0.90 | 0.00 |
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM) | 0.15 | 0.22 |
Debt-to-Assets Ratio (TTM) | 0.03 | 0.06 |
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | 1.95 | 14.09 |