ARES vs. BX: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
UpdatedHere’s a clear look at ARES and BX, comparing key factors like performance, valuation metrics, dividends, and financial strength. It’s built for investors or anyone curious to see how these two stocks match up.
Company Overview
BX stands out with 162.23 billion USD in market value—about 4.75× ARES’s market cap of 34.18 billion USD.
With betas of 1.42 for ARES and 1.66 for BX, both show similar volatility profiles relative to the overall market.
| Symbol | ARES | BX |
|---|---|---|
| Company Name | Ares Management Corporation | Blackstone Inc. |
| Country | US | US |
| Sector | Financial Services | Financial Services |
| Industry | Asset Management | Asset Management |
| CEO | Mr. Michael J. Arougheti | Mr. Stephen Allen Schwarzman B.A., M.B.A. |
| Price | 158.98 USD | 137.49 USD |
| Market Cap | 34.18 billion USD | 162.23 billion USD |
| Beta | 1.42 | 1.66 |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| IPO Date | May 2, 2014 | June 22, 2007 |
| ADR | No | No |
Performance Comparison
This chart compares the performance of ARES and BX over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).
Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.
Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Valuation Metrics Comparison
For a detailed comparison of valuation metrics between ARES and BX, please refer to the table below.
| Symbol | ARES | BX |
|---|---|---|
| Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM) | 64.72 | 41.59 |
| Forward PEG Ratio (TTM) | 2.92 | 2.30 |
| Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM) | 6.95 | 13.57 |
| Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM) | 7.47 | 13.26 |
| Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM) | 6.22 | 47.45 |
| EV-to-EBITDA (TTM) | 20.91 | 36.58 |
| EV-to-Sales (TTM) | 6.97 | 13.57 |
| EV-to-Free Cash Flow (TTM) | 6.23 | 47.45 |
Dividend Comparison
Both ARES and BX offer similar dividend yields (2.46% vs. 2.95%), indicating comparable approaches to balancing income and growth.
| Symbol | ARES | BX |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 2.46% | 2.95% |
Financial Strength Metrics Comparison
This section dives into the financial resilience of ARES and BX, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.
- With current ratios of 0.90 and 0.00, both ARES and BX have less current assets than short-term liabilities, which could strain their working capital and force reliance on additional financing.
- BX posts a quick ratio of 0.00, indicating limited coverage of short-term debts from its most liquid assets—while ARES at 0.90 enjoys stronger liquidity resilience.
- ARES (at 1.95) covers its interest payments, while BX shows “--” for minimal debt service.
| Symbol | ARES | BX |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (TTM) | 0.90 | 0.00 |
| Quick Ratio (TTM) | 0.90 | 0.00 |
| Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM) | 0.15 | 0.00 |
| Debt-to-Assets Ratio (TTM) | 0.03 | 0.00 |
| Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | 1.95 | -- |