Seek Returns logo

ARES vs. BNT: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at ARES and BNT, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolARESBNT
Company NameAres Management CorporationBrookfield Wealth Solutions Ltd.
CountryUnited StatesBermuda
GICS SectorFinancialsFinancials
GICS IndustryCapital MarketsInsurance
Market Capitalization49.04 billion USD19.33 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateMay 2, 2014June 28, 2021
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of ARES and BNT by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

ARES vs. BNT: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolARESBNT
5-Day Price Return-6.12%-0.34%
13-Week Price Return-14.16%10.11%
26-Week Price Return0.44%27.54%
52-Week Price Return-4.43%33.86%
Month-to-Date Return-6.12%0.52%
Year-to-Date Return-15.21%16.00%
10-Day Avg. Volume2.57M0.04M
3-Month Avg. Volume1.54M0.03M
3-Month Volatility29.87%23.90%
Beta1.592.02

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

ARES

13.30%

Capital Markets Industry

Max
38.97%
Q3
22.24%
Median
13.52%
Q1
8.61%
Min
-4.25%

ARES’s Return on Equity of 13.30% is on par with the norm for the Capital Markets industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

BNT

6.12%

Insurance Industry

Max
30.96%
Q3
18.76%
Median
14.22%
Q1
10.34%
Min
1.73%

BNT’s Return on Equity of 6.12% is in the lower quartile for the Insurance industry. This indicates a less efficient generation of profit from its equity base when compared to its competitors.

ARES vs. BNT: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Capital Markets and Insurance industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

ARES

9.94%

Capital Markets Industry

Max
69.91%
Q3
37.24%
Median
24.30%
Q1
13.06%
Min
-15.18%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Capital Markets industry, ARES’s Net Profit Margin of 9.94% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

BNT

5.50%

Insurance Industry

Max
26.78%
Q3
14.69%
Median
9.87%
Q1
6.59%
Min
-3.51%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Insurance industry, BNT’s Net Profit Margin of 5.50% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

ARES vs. BNT: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Capital Markets and Insurance industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

ARES

17.40%

Capital Markets Industry

Max
84.86%
Q3
47.16%
Median
32.23%
Q1
18.65%
Min
-21.87%

ARES’s Operating Profit Margin of 17.40% is in the lower quartile for the Capital Markets industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

BNT

28.76%

Insurance Industry

Max
34.52%
Q3
20.17%
Median
14.46%
Q1
9.62%
Min
-2.51%

In the Insurance industry, Operating Profit Margin is often not the primary measure of operational efficiency.

ARES vs. BNT: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Capital Markets and Insurance industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolARESBNT
Return on Equity (TTM)13.30%6.12%
Return on Assets (TTM)1.85%0.56%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)9.94%5.50%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)17.40%28.76%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)----

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

ARES

0.31

Capital Markets Industry

Max
3.37
Q3
1.81
Median
1.01
Q1
0.56
Min
0.04

For the Capital Markets industry, the Current Ratio is often not the most suitable measure of short-term liquidity.

BNT

0.13

Insurance Industry

Max
2.97
Q3
1.37
Median
0.54
Q1
0.15
Min
0.00

For the Insurance industry, the Current Ratio is often not the most suitable measure of short-term liquidity.

ARES vs. BNT: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Capital Markets and Insurance industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

ARES

2.93

Capital Markets Industry

Max
6.52
Q3
2.79
Median
0.96
Q1
0.28
Min
0.00

The Debt-to-Equity Ratio is often not the primary focus for assessing leverage in the Capital Markets industry.

BNT

0.31

Insurance Industry

Max
1.25
Q3
0.65
Median
0.34
Q1
0.23
Min
0.00

The Debt-to-Equity Ratio is often not the primary focus for assessing leverage in the Insurance industry.

ARES vs. BNT: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Capital Markets and Insurance industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

ARES

--

Capital Markets Industry

Max
107.59
Q3
48.41
Median
10.85
Q1
4.56
Min
-36.26

The Interest Coverage Ratio is often not a primary indicator of debt servicing capacity in the Capital Markets industry.

BNT

1.58

Insurance Industry

Max
43.68
Q3
21.45
Median
9.67
Q1
3.55
Min
-5.73

The Interest Coverage Ratio is often not a primary indicator of debt servicing capacity in the Insurance industry.

ARES vs. BNT: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Capital Markets and Insurance industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolARESBNT
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.310.13
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.310.13
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)2.930.31
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)--1.58

Growth

Revenue Growth

ARES vs. BNT: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

ARES vs. BNT: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

ARES

4.73%

Capital Markets Industry

Max
9.02%
Q3
4.54%
Median
2.55%
Q1
1.27%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 4.73%, ARES offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Capital Markets industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

BNT

0.00%

Insurance Industry

Max
9.80%
Q3
5.18%
Median
3.58%
Q1
2.07%
Min
0.00%

BNT currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

ARES vs. BNT: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Capital Markets and Insurance industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

ARES

323.31%

Capital Markets Industry

Max
199.38%
Q3
99.28%
Median
60.67%
Q1
32.00%
Min
0.00%

At 323.31%, ARES’s Dividend Payout Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical range for the Capital Markets industry. While this provides a significant return to shareholders, it may limit funds for reinvestment and could be difficult to sustain.

BNT

0.00%

Insurance Industry

Max
169.40%
Q3
85.57%
Median
53.26%
Q1
23.68%
Min
0.00%

BNT has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

ARES vs. BNT: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Capital Markets and Insurance industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolARESBNT
Dividend Yield (TTM)4.73%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)323.31%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

ARES

68.42

Capital Markets Industry

Max
51.69
Q3
29.42
Median
17.58
Q1
12.55
Min
5.59

At 68.42, ARES’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Capital Markets industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

BNT

24.72

Insurance Industry

Max
30.75
Q3
18.11
Median
12.67
Q1
9.66
Min
2.87

A P/E Ratio of 24.72 places BNT in the upper quartile for the Insurance industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

ARES vs. BNT: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Capital Markets and Insurance industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

ARES

6.80

Capital Markets Industry

Max
14.65
Q3
7.29
Median
4.53
Q1
2.26
Min
0.04

ARES’s P/S Ratio of 6.80 aligns with the market consensus for the Capital Markets industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

BNT

1.36

Insurance Industry

Max
3.41
Q3
1.88
Median
1.22
Q1
0.80
Min
0.23

BNT’s P/S Ratio of 1.36 aligns with the market consensus for the Insurance industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

ARES vs. BNT: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Capital Markets and Insurance industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

ARES

12.97

Capital Markets Industry

Max
10.83
Q3
5.12
Median
2.66
Q1
1.19
Min
0.37

At 12.97, ARES’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Capital Markets industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

BNT

0.17

Insurance Industry

Max
4.57
Q3
2.56
Median
1.88
Q1
1.20
Min
0.17

BNT’s P/B Ratio of 0.17 is below the established floor for the Insurance industry. This may signal that the market is deeply pessimistic or has overlooked the company, potentially offering its asset base at a significant discount.

ARES vs. BNT: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Capital Markets and Insurance industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolARESBNT
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)68.4224.72
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)6.801.36
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)12.970.17
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)8.264.73