Seek Returns logo

ARE vs. PSA: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at ARE and PSA, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

Both ARE and PSA are Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs). These entities are required to distribute the majority of their taxable income to shareholders, often resulting in higher dividend yields.

SymbolAREPSA
Company NameAlexandria Real Estate Equities, Inc.Public Storage
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorReal EstateReal Estate
GICS IndustryOffice REITsSpecialized REITs
Market Capitalization14.07 billion USD51.69 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateMay 28, 1997November 18, 1980
Security TypeREITREIT

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of ARE and PSA by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

ARE vs. PSA: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolAREPSA
5-Day Price Return2.51%1.64%
13-Week Price Return15.71%-3.74%
26-Week Price Return-18.32%-4.54%
52-Week Price Return-30.79%-13.55%
Month-to-Date Return7.86%8.33%
Year-to-Date Return-15.49%-1.62%
10-Day Avg. Volume1.10M0.56M
3-Month Avg. Volume1.67M0.80M
3-Month Volatility29.20%20.33%
Beta1.330.89

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

ARE

-0.06%

Office REITs Industry

Max
9.47%
Q3
6.07%
Median
3.22%
Q1
0.83%
Min
-0.08%

ARE has a negative Return on Equity of -0.06%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

PSA

18.93%

Specialized REITs Industry

Max
37.66%
Q3
20.19%
Median
8.96%
Q1
6.32%
Min
-1.71%

PSA’s Return on Equity of 18.93% is on par with the norm for the Specialized REITs industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

ARE vs. PSA: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Office REITs and Specialized REITs industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

ARE

-0.32%

Office REITs Industry

Max
74.75%
Q3
44.46%
Median
31.39%
Q1
5.85%
Min
-0.35%

In the Office REITs industry, Net Profit Margin is often not the primary profitability metric.

PSA

38.13%

Specialized REITs Industry

Max
67.81%
Q3
40.70%
Median
25.91%
Q1
11.01%
Min
1.95%

In the Specialized REITs industry, Net Profit Margin is often not the primary profitability metric.

ARE vs. PSA: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Office REITs and Specialized REITs industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

ARE

12.67%

Office REITs Industry

Max
91.62%
Q3
51.67%
Median
42.78%
Q1
23.56%
Min
14.93%

In the Office REITs industry, Operating Profit Margin is often not the primary measure of operational efficiency.

PSA

46.56%

Specialized REITs Industry

Max
107.13%
Q3
55.10%
Median
41.03%
Q1
17.97%
Min
5.94%

In the Specialized REITs industry, Operating Profit Margin is often not the primary measure of operational efficiency.

ARE vs. PSA: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Office REITs and Specialized REITs industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolAREPSA
Return on Equity (TTM)-0.06%18.93%
Return on Assets (TTM)-0.03%9.09%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)-0.32%38.13%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)12.67%46.56%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)71.25%73.00%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

ARE

0.40

Office REITs Industry

Max
1.49
Q3
1.22
Median
0.67
Q1
0.44
Min
0.14

ARE’s Current Ratio of 0.40 falls into the lower quartile for the Office REITs industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

PSA

0.84

Specialized REITs Industry

Max
1.74
Q3
1.13
Median
0.59
Q1
0.35
Min
0.09

PSA’s Current Ratio of 0.84 aligns with the median group of the Specialized REITs industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

ARE vs. PSA: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Office REITs and Specialized REITs industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

ARE

0.77

Office REITs Industry

Max
1.62
Q3
1.32
Median
0.87
Q1
0.73
Min
0.42

ARE’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.77 is typical for the Office REITs industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

PSA

1.11

Specialized REITs Industry

Max
4.54
Q3
3.26
Median
1.09
Q1
0.58
Min
0.16

PSA’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.11 is typical for the Specialized REITs industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

ARE vs. PSA: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Office REITs and Specialized REITs industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

ARE

2.75

Office REITs Industry

Max
3.98
Q3
3.37
Median
1.66
Q1
1.16
Min
0.14

ARE’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 2.75 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Office REITs industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

PSA

18.96

Specialized REITs Industry

Max
5.24
Q3
4.05
Median
2.99
Q1
2.10
Min
1.28

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 18.96, PSA demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Specialized REITs industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

ARE vs. PSA: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Office REITs and Specialized REITs industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolAREPSA
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.400.84
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.400.84
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.771.11
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)2.7518.96

Growth

Revenue Growth

ARE vs. PSA: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

ARE vs. PSA: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

ARE

6.74%

Office REITs Industry

Max
6.88%
Q3
5.94%
Median
4.58%
Q1
3.82%
Min
1.22%

With a Dividend Yield of 6.74%, ARE offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Office REITs industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

PSA

4.57%

Specialized REITs Industry

Max
7.06%
Q3
5.09%
Median
4.51%
Q1
3.18%
Min
1.78%

PSA’s Dividend Yield of 4.57% is consistent with its peers in the Specialized REITs industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

ARE vs. PSA: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Office REITs and Specialized REITs industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

ARE

174.29%

Office REITs Industry

Max
231.12%
Q3
180.65%
Median
94.76%
Q1
87.60%
Min
1.02%

ARE’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 174.29% is within the typical range for the Office REITs industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

PSA

127.11%

Specialized REITs Industry

Max
295.93%
Q3
182.11%
Median
119.31%
Q1
65.42%
Min
43.86%

PSA’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 127.11% is within the typical range for the Specialized REITs industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

ARE vs. PSA: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Office REITs and Specialized REITs industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolAREPSA
Dividend Yield (TTM)6.74%4.57%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)174.29%127.11%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

ARE

--

Office REITs Industry

Max
48.29
Q3
44.14
Median
23.60
Q1
18.77
Min
6.08

The P/E Ratio is often not the primary metric for valuation in the Office REITs industry.

PSA

27.84

Specialized REITs Industry

Max
85.59
Q3
64.69
Median
29.09
Q1
18.22
Min
8.79

The P/E Ratio is often not the primary metric for valuation in the Specialized REITs industry.

ARE vs. PSA: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Office REITs and Specialized REITs industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

ARE

4.21

Office REITs Industry

Max
14.09
Q3
9.33
Median
6.96
Q1
4.25
Min
2.65

In the lower quartile for the Office REITs industry, ARE’s P/S Ratio of 4.21 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

PSA

10.62

Specialized REITs Industry

Max
14.35
Q3
9.60
Median
8.74
Q1
5.61
Min
1.63

PSA’s P/S Ratio of 10.62 is in the upper echelon for the Specialized REITs industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

ARE vs. PSA: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Office REITs and Specialized REITs industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

ARE

0.73

Office REITs Industry

Max
2.06
Q3
1.34
Median
1.02
Q1
0.68
Min
0.57

ARE’s P/B Ratio of 0.73 is within the conventional range for the Office REITs industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

PSA

5.49

Specialized REITs Industry

Max
11.33
Q3
5.68
Median
2.69
Q1
1.81
Min
0.71

PSA’s P/B Ratio of 5.49 is within the conventional range for the Specialized REITs industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

ARE vs. PSA: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Office REITs and Specialized REITs industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolAREPSA
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)--27.84
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)4.2110.62
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)0.735.49
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)539.8625.66