Seek Returns logo

ARE vs. LAMR: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at ARE and LAMR, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

Both ARE and LAMR are Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs). These entities are required to distribute the majority of their taxable income to shareholders, often resulting in higher dividend yields.

SymbolARELAMR
Company NameAlexandria Real Estate Equities, Inc.Lamar Advertising Company
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorReal EstateReal Estate
GICS IndustryOffice REITsSpecialized REITs
Market Capitalization8.98 billion USD13.12 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENasdaqGS
Listing DateMay 28, 1997August 2, 1996
Security TypeREITREIT

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of ARE and LAMR by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

ARE vs. LAMR: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolARELAMR
5-Day Price Return-3.63%3.75%
13-Week Price Return-31.28%5.16%
26-Week Price Return-27.78%9.03%
52-Week Price Return-52.04%1.08%
Month-to-Date Return-10.19%9.31%
Year-to-Date Return-46.40%6.48%
10-Day Avg. Volume2.69M0.69M
3-Month Avg. Volume1.95M0.55M
3-Month Volatility49.66%21.67%
Beta1.331.25

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

ARE

-2.38%

Office REITs Industry

Max
10.01%
Q3
6.77%
Median
5.21%
Q1
1.77%
Min
-3.82%

ARE has a negative Return on Equity of -2.38%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

LAMR

43.21%

Specialized REITs Industry

Max
21.01%
Q3
18.18%
Median
9.46%
Q1
6.81%
Min
-1.71%

LAMR’s Return on Equity of 43.21% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Specialized REITs industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

ARE vs. LAMR: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Office REITs and Specialized REITs industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

ARE

-12.89%

Office REITs Industry

Max
85.58%
Q3
47.99%
Median
43.80%
Q1
13.41%
Min
-12.89%

In the Office REITs industry, Net Profit Margin is often not the primary profitability metric.

LAMR

19.28%

Specialized REITs Industry

Max
89.50%
Q3
41.93%
Median
28.06%
Q1
6.77%
Min
-1.41%

In the Specialized REITs industry, Net Profit Margin is often not the primary profitability metric.

ARE vs. LAMR: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Office REITs and Specialized REITs industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

ARE

0.28%

Office REITs Industry

Max
115.21%
Q3
75.07%
Median
39.18%
Q1
22.39%
Min
0.28%

In the Office REITs industry, Operating Profit Margin is often not the primary measure of operational efficiency.

LAMR

27.23%

Specialized REITs Industry

Max
107.13%
Q3
56.09%
Median
42.12%
Q1
16.71%
Min
8.05%

In the Specialized REITs industry, Operating Profit Margin is often not the primary measure of operational efficiency.

ARE vs. LAMR: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Office REITs and Specialized REITs industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolARELAMR
Return on Equity (TTM)-2.38%43.21%
Return on Assets (TTM)-1.09%6.51%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)-12.89%19.28%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)0.28%27.23%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)70.81%81.69%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

ARE

0.41

Office REITs Industry

Max
1.67
Q3
1.07
Median
0.62
Q1
0.40
Min
0.14

ARE’s Current Ratio of 0.41 aligns with the median group of the Office REITs industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

LAMR

0.59

Specialized REITs Industry

Max
1.96
Q3
1.17
Median
0.59
Q1
0.40
Min
0.18

LAMR’s Current Ratio of 0.59 aligns with the median group of the Specialized REITs industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

ARE vs. LAMR: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Office REITs and Specialized REITs industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

ARE

0.82

Office REITs Industry

Max
1.62
Q3
1.36
Median
0.87
Q1
0.79
Min
0.44

ARE’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.82 is typical for the Office REITs industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

LAMR

3.26

Specialized REITs Industry

Max
5.86
Q3
3.59
Median
1.22
Q1
0.62
Min
0.16

LAMR’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 3.26 is typical for the Specialized REITs industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

ARE vs. LAMR: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Office REITs and Specialized REITs industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

ARE

2.75

Office REITs Industry

Max
3.98
Q3
3.37
Median
2.01
Q1
1.33
Min
0.20

ARE’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 2.75 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Office REITs industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

LAMR

3.24

Specialized REITs Industry

Max
5.24
Q3
4.21
Median
2.99
Q1
2.08
Min
1.14

LAMR’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 3.24 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Specialized REITs industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

ARE vs. LAMR: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Office REITs and Specialized REITs industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolARELAMR
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.410.59
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.410.59
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.823.26
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)2.753.24

Growth

Revenue Growth

ARE vs. LAMR: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

ARE vs. LAMR: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

ARE

10.09%

Office REITs Industry

Max
10.09%
Q3
6.32%
Median
5.45%
Q1
3.78%
Min
2.02%

With a Dividend Yield of 10.09%, ARE offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Office REITs industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

LAMR

4.90%

Specialized REITs Industry

Max
7.38%
Q3
5.67%
Median
4.70%
Q1
3.55%
Min
2.22%

LAMR’s Dividend Yield of 4.90% is consistent with its peers in the Specialized REITs industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

ARE vs. LAMR: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Office REITs and Specialized REITs industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

ARE

174.29%

Office REITs Industry

Max
277.06%
Q3
172.99%
Median
93.19%
Q1
80.70%
Min
22.44%

ARE’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 174.29% is in the upper quartile for the Office REITs industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

LAMR

108.94%

Specialized REITs Industry

Max
218.54%
Q3
158.23%
Median
122.76%
Q1
94.76%
Min
16.73%

LAMR’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 108.94% is within the typical range for the Specialized REITs industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

ARE vs. LAMR: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Office REITs and Specialized REITs industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolARELAMR
Dividend Yield (TTM)10.09%4.90%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)174.29%108.94%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

ARE

--

Office REITs Industry

Max
75.52
Q3
39.54
Median
24.79
Q1
14.78
Min
5.56

The P/E Ratio is often not the primary metric for valuation in the Office REITs industry.

LAMR

30.28

Specialized REITs Industry

Max
72.02
Q3
45.17
Median
27.34
Q1
18.18
Min
4.41

The P/E Ratio is often not the primary metric for valuation in the Specialized REITs industry.

ARE vs. LAMR: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Office REITs and Specialized REITs industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

ARE

2.83

Office REITs Industry

Max
15.44
Q3
9.11
Median
6.86
Q1
3.90
Min
1.99

In the lower quartile for the Office REITs industry, ARE’s P/S Ratio of 2.83 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

LAMR

5.84

Specialized REITs Industry

Max
10.44
Q3
8.46
Median
7.76
Q1
5.30
Min
2.06

LAMR’s P/S Ratio of 5.84 aligns with the market consensus for the Specialized REITs industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

ARE vs. LAMR: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Office REITs and Specialized REITs industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

ARE

0.87

Office REITs Industry

Max
2.35
Q3
1.42
Median
1.05
Q1
0.72
Min
0.65

ARE’s P/B Ratio of 0.87 is within the conventional range for the Office REITs industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

LAMR

12.00

Specialized REITs Industry

Max
12.00
Q3
6.44
Median
2.47
Q1
1.61
Min
0.61

LAMR’s P/B Ratio of 12.00 is in the upper tier for the Specialized REITs industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

ARE vs. LAMR: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Office REITs and Specialized REITs industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolARELAMR
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)--30.28
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)2.835.84
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)0.8712.00
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)360.3918.46