Seek Returns logo

ARE vs. CCI: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at ARE and CCI, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

Both ARE and CCI are Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs). These entities are required to distribute the majority of their taxable income to shareholders, often resulting in higher dividend yields.

SymbolARECCI
Company NameAlexandria Real Estate Equities, Inc.Crown Castle Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorReal EstateReal Estate
GICS IndustryOffice REITsSpecialized REITs
Market Capitalization14.07 billion USD43.17 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateMay 28, 1997August 18, 1998
Security TypeREITREIT

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of ARE and CCI by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

ARE vs. CCI: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolARECCI
5-Day Price Return2.51%-3.72%
13-Week Price Return15.71%-1.21%
26-Week Price Return-18.32%6.23%
52-Week Price Return-30.79%-12.64%
Month-to-Date Return7.86%-5.66%
Year-to-Date Return-15.49%9.23%
10-Day Avg. Volume1.10M3.06M
3-Month Avg. Volume1.67M3.09M
3-Month Volatility29.20%21.15%
Beta1.330.98

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

ARE

-0.06%

Office REITs Industry

Max
9.47%
Q3
6.07%
Median
3.22%
Q1
0.83%
Min
-0.08%

ARE has a negative Return on Equity of -0.06%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

CCI

21.01%

Specialized REITs Industry

Max
37.66%
Q3
20.19%
Median
8.96%
Q1
6.32%
Min
-1.71%

In the upper quartile for the Specialized REITs industry, CCI’s Return on Equity of 21.01% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

ARE vs. CCI: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Office REITs and Specialized REITs industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

ARE

-0.32%

Office REITs Industry

Max
74.75%
Q3
44.46%
Median
31.39%
Q1
5.85%
Min
-0.35%

In the Office REITs industry, Net Profit Margin is often not the primary profitability metric.

CCI

-85.54%

Specialized REITs Industry

Max
67.81%
Q3
40.70%
Median
25.91%
Q1
11.01%
Min
1.95%

In the Specialized REITs industry, Net Profit Margin is often not the primary profitability metric.

ARE vs. CCI: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Office REITs and Specialized REITs industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

ARE

12.67%

Office REITs Industry

Max
91.62%
Q3
51.67%
Median
42.78%
Q1
23.56%
Min
14.93%

In the Office REITs industry, Operating Profit Margin is often not the primary measure of operational efficiency.

CCI

-54.11%

Specialized REITs Industry

Max
107.13%
Q3
55.10%
Median
41.03%
Q1
17.97%
Min
5.94%

In the Specialized REITs industry, Operating Profit Margin is often not the primary measure of operational efficiency.

ARE vs. CCI: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Office REITs and Specialized REITs industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolARECCI
Return on Equity (TTM)-0.06%21.01%
Return on Assets (TTM)-0.03%-13.83%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)-0.32%-85.54%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)12.67%-54.11%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)71.25%72.89%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

ARE

0.40

Office REITs Industry

Max
1.49
Q3
1.22
Median
0.67
Q1
0.44
Min
0.14

ARE’s Current Ratio of 0.40 falls into the lower quartile for the Office REITs industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

CCI

0.28

Specialized REITs Industry

Max
1.74
Q3
1.13
Median
0.59
Q1
0.35
Min
0.09

CCI’s Current Ratio of 0.28 falls into the lower quartile for the Specialized REITs industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

ARE vs. CCI: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Office REITs and Specialized REITs industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

ARE

0.77

Office REITs Industry

Max
1.62
Q3
1.32
Median
0.87
Q1
0.73
Min
0.42

ARE’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.77 is typical for the Office REITs industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

CCI

4.54

Specialized REITs Industry

Max
4.54
Q3
3.26
Median
1.09
Q1
0.58
Min
0.16

CCI’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Specialized REITs industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 4.54. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

ARE vs. CCI: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Office REITs and Specialized REITs industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

ARE

2.75

Office REITs Industry

Max
3.98
Q3
3.37
Median
1.66
Q1
1.16
Min
0.14

ARE’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 2.75 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Office REITs industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

CCI

-3.25

Specialized REITs Industry

Max
5.24
Q3
4.05
Median
2.99
Q1
2.10
Min
1.28

CCI has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -3.25. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

ARE vs. CCI: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Office REITs and Specialized REITs industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolARECCI
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.400.28
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.400.26
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.774.54
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)2.75-3.25

Growth

Revenue Growth

ARE vs. CCI: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

ARE vs. CCI: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

ARE

6.74%

Office REITs Industry

Max
6.88%
Q3
5.94%
Median
4.58%
Q1
3.82%
Min
1.22%

With a Dividend Yield of 6.74%, ARE offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Office REITs industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

CCI

5.64%

Specialized REITs Industry

Max
7.06%
Q3
5.09%
Median
4.51%
Q1
3.18%
Min
1.78%

With a Dividend Yield of 5.64%, CCI offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Specialized REITs industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

ARE vs. CCI: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Office REITs and Specialized REITs industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

ARE

174.29%

Office REITs Industry

Max
231.12%
Q3
180.65%
Median
94.76%
Q1
87.60%
Min
1.02%

ARE’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 174.29% is within the typical range for the Office REITs industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

CCI

192.59%

Specialized REITs Industry

Max
295.93%
Q3
182.11%
Median
119.31%
Q1
65.42%
Min
43.86%

CCI’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 192.59% is in the upper quartile for the Specialized REITs industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

ARE vs. CCI: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Office REITs and Specialized REITs industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolARECCI
Dividend Yield (TTM)6.74%5.64%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)174.29%192.59%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

ARE

--

Office REITs Industry

Max
48.29
Q3
44.14
Median
23.60
Q1
18.77
Min
6.08

The P/E Ratio is often not the primary metric for valuation in the Office REITs industry.

CCI

--

Specialized REITs Industry

Max
85.59
Q3
64.69
Median
29.09
Q1
18.22
Min
8.79

The P/E Ratio is often not the primary metric for valuation in the Specialized REITs industry.

ARE vs. CCI: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Office REITs and Specialized REITs industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

ARE

4.21

Office REITs Industry

Max
14.09
Q3
9.33
Median
6.96
Q1
4.25
Min
2.65

In the lower quartile for the Office REITs industry, ARE’s P/S Ratio of 4.21 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

CCI

8.23

Specialized REITs Industry

Max
14.35
Q3
9.60
Median
8.74
Q1
5.61
Min
1.63

CCI’s P/S Ratio of 8.23 aligns with the market consensus for the Specialized REITs industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

ARE vs. CCI: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Office REITs and Specialized REITs industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

ARE

0.73

Office REITs Industry

Max
2.06
Q3
1.34
Median
1.02
Q1
0.68
Min
0.57

ARE’s P/B Ratio of 0.73 is within the conventional range for the Office REITs industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

CCI

9.74

Specialized REITs Industry

Max
11.33
Q3
5.68
Median
2.69
Q1
1.81
Min
0.71

CCI’s P/B Ratio of 9.74 is in the upper tier for the Specialized REITs industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

ARE vs. CCI: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Office REITs and Specialized REITs industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolARECCI
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)----
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)4.218.23
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)0.739.74
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)539.8618.61