Seek Returns

ARCC vs. NMR: Ares Capital vs. Nomura Stock Comparison

How do Ares Capital (ARCC) and Nomura (NMR) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.

Company Profile

Ares Capital (ARCC) and Nomura (NMR) both belong to the Capital Markets industry, though ARCC is classified under Asset Management & Custody Banks while NMR falls under Investment Banking & Brokerage.

Ares Capital (ARCC) trades as ordinary local shares, while Nomura (NMR) trades as an ADR — compare with FX exposure, depositary-program fees, and dividend-withholding-tax differences in mind.

Company profile comparison for Ares Capital (ARCC) and Nomura (NMR)
Profile ItemARCCNMR
NameAres Capital Corp.Nomura Holdings, Inc. Sponsored ADR
Country/RegionUnited StatesJapan
GICS SectorFinancialsFinancials
GICS Industry GroupFinancial ServicesFinancial Services
GICS IndustryCapital MarketsCapital Markets
GICS Sub-IndustryAsset Management & Custody BanksInvestment Banking & Brokerage
Market Capitalization13.82 billion USD27.53 billion USD
CurrencyUSDUSD
ExchangeNasdaqNYSE
Listing DateOctober 5, 2004December 17, 2001
Security TypeCommon StockADR

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

ARCC
NMR
GSPC
Loading price history…
Ares Capital (ARCC) vs. Nomura (NMR), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past five years. Adjusted for dividends and splits.

Trailing Returns

Loading price history…
Trailing total returns for Ares Capital (ARCC) and Nomura (NMR). Returns over one year are annualized.

Calendar-Year Returns

Loading price history…
Calendar-year total returns for Ares Capital (ARCC) and Nomura (NMR). Each bar is that year's total return, measured year-end to year-end.

Performance Metrics

Price performance metrics for Ares Capital (ARCC) and Nomura (NMR)
MetricARCCNMR
Total Return (1Y)5.40%35.42%
Total Return (3Y, Annualized)9.48%37.86%
Total Return (5Y, Annualized)8.26%18.78%

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

ARCC
NMR
GSPC
Loading price history…
Ares Capital (ARCC) vs. Nomura (NMR), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Drawdown from the running peak over the past five years. Each line shows the decline from its prior peak; 0% marks a new high.

Return Distribution

Loading price history…
Distribution of monthly total returns for Ares Capital (ARCC) and Nomura (NMR). Each bar is the share of months whose return fell in that 5% bucket.

Risk Metrics

Risk profile metrics for Ares Capital (ARCC) and Nomura (NMR)
MetricARCCNMR
Volatility (1Y, Annualized)18.97%29.52%
Beta (5Y)0.590.79
Max Drawdown (5Y)-21.76%-38.40%
Avg. Volume (3M)4.45M789.26K

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Loading chart…
ARCC and NMR are plotted by 1-year volatility (risk) and 1-year return. The dashed Capital Allocation Line runs from the risk-free rate through the shared industry median.

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Risk-adjusted metrics for Ares Capital (ARCC) and Nomura (NMR)
MetricARCCNMR
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)0.061.06
Sortino Ratio (1Y)0.091.55

Profitability

ROE (TTM)

Both Ares Capital (ARCC) at 6.19% and Nomura (NMR) at 11.51% land near their industries’ usual ROE ranges, so capital efficiency looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.

ARCC

Financial Services industry group

6.19%

Max
44.78%
Q3
21.85%
Median
12.91%
ARCC
6.19%
Q1
4.48%
Min
-18.71%

NMR

Financial Services industry group

11.51%

Max
44.78%
Q3
21.85%
Median
12.91%
NMR
11.51%
Q1
4.48%
Min
-18.71%
Loading chart…
Ares Capital (ARCC) vs. Nomura (NMR): A comparison of their ROE against the Financial Services industry group benchmark.

Net Margin (TTM)

Ares Capital (ARCC) at 28.35% retains a top-quartile share of revenue as profit, ahead of Nomura (NMR) at 17.12%, which keeps about the industry-typical share.

ARCC

Financial Services industry group

28.35%

Max
62.84%
ARCC
28.35%
Q3
28.05%
Median
15.36%
Q1
4.82%
Min
-28.52%

NMR

Financial Services industry group

17.12%

Max
62.84%
Q3
28.05%
NMR
17.12%
Median
15.36%
Q1
4.82%
Min
-28.52%
Loading chart…
Ares Capital (ARCC) vs. Nomura (NMR): A comparison of their net margin against the Financial Services industry group benchmark.

Operating Margin (TTM)

Ares Capital (ARCC) at 72.74% operates in the top operating margin quartile, ahead of Nomura (NMR) at 24.36%, which runs around its industry’s norm.

ARCC

Financial Services industry group

72.74%

Max
107.33%
ARCC
72.74%
Q3
55.90%
Median
30.09%
Q1
14.60%
Min
-44.34%

NMR

Financial Services industry group

24.36%

Max
107.33%
Q3
55.90%
Median
30.09%
NMR
24.36%
Q1
14.60%
Min
-44.34%
Loading chart…
Ares Capital (ARCC) vs. Nomura (NMR): A comparison of their operating margin against the Financial Services industry group benchmark.

Profitability Metrics

Profitability metrics for Ares Capital (ARCC) and Nomura (NMR)
MetricARCCNMR
ROE (TTM)6.19%11.51%
ROA (TTM)4.78%0.68%
Net Margin (TTM)28.35%17.12%
Operating Margin (TTM)72.74%24.36%
Gross Margin (TTM)----

Growth

Revenue Growth

Nomura (NMR) at 10.80% is around its peer norm for revenue growth, while Ares Capital (ARCC) at -12.08% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker demand or pricing momentum.

Loading chart…
Ares Capital (ARCC) vs. Nomura (NMR): A comparison of their Revenue Growth across different time periods.

EPS Growth

Both Ares Capital (ARCC) at -23.77% and Nomura (NMR) at 7.17% land near their industries' usual EPS growth ranges, so bottom-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.

Loading chart…
Ares Capital (ARCC) vs. Nomura (NMR): A comparison of their EPS Growth across different time periods.

Growth Metrics

Growth metrics for Ares Capital (ARCC) and Nomura (NMR)
MetricARCCNMR
Revenue Growth (YoY)-12.08%10.80%
Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR)26.67%17.17%
EPS Growth (YoY)-23.77%7.17%
EPS Growth (3Y CAGR)16.05%58.75%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

current ratio doesn’t apply on either side: Ares Capital (ARCC) in Financial Services and Nomura (NMR) in Financial Services both report balance sheets without a current/non-current split, so their short-term liquidity is better judged through regulatory and funding measures.

Debt / Equity (MRQ)

debt-to-equity ratio is set aside for both: Ares Capital (ARCC) in Financial Services and Nomura (NMR) in Financial Services run businesses where balance-sheet leverage is part of the model, so capital-adequacy and funding measures are the better gauges of balance-sheet risk.

Financial Strength Metrics

Financial strength metrics for Ares Capital (ARCC) and Nomura (NMR)
MetricARCCNMR
Current Ratio (MRQ)----
Debt / Equity (MRQ)----
Net Debt / EBITDA----

Dividends

Dividend Yield (TTM)

Both Ares Capital (ARCC) at 9.92% and Nomura (NMR) at 620.40% yield above their industries’ entire benchmark ranges — high enough that dividend safety, not income, becomes the first question.

ARCC

Financial Services industry group

9.92%

ARCC
9.92%
Max
9.77%
Q3
3.92%
Median
1.09%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

NMR

Financial Services industry group

620.40%

NMR
620.40%
Max
9.77%
Q3
3.92%
Median
1.09%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%
Loading chart…
Ares Capital (ARCC) vs. Nomura (NMR): A comparison of their dividend yield against the Financial Services industry group benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

Ares Capital (ARCC) reports payout ratio above 100% at 157.38%, meaning dividends exceeded current-period earnings and sustainability needs extra context. Meanwhile Nomura (NMR) reports 16.85%, ranking against industry peers normally.

ARCC

Financial Services industry group

157.38%

Max
241.07%
ARCC
157.38%
Q3
97.36%
Median
25.77%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

NMR

Financial Services industry group

16.85%

Max
241.07%
Q3
97.36%
Median
25.77%
NMR
16.85%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%
Loading chart…
Ares Capital (ARCC) vs. Nomura (NMR): A comparison of their payout ratio against the Financial Services industry group benchmark.

Dividend Metrics

Dividend metrics for Ares Capital (ARCC) and Nomura (NMR)
MetricARCCNMR
Dividend Yield (TTM)9.92%620.40%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)157.38%16.85%

Valuation

P/E Ratio (TTM)

Both Ares Capital (ARCC) at 15.68 and Nomura (NMR) at 10.83 land around their industries’ usual P/E ratio levels — neither is getting a clear earnings-multiple discount or premium versus peers.

ARCC

Financial Services industry group

15.68

Max
45.85
Q3
24.64
ARCC
15.68
Median
15.37
Q1
9.68
Min
0.16

NMR

Financial Services industry group

10.83

Max
45.85
Q3
24.64
Median
15.37
NMR
10.83
Q1
9.68
Min
0.16
Loading chart…
Ares Capital (ARCC) vs. Nomura (NMR): A comparison of their P/E ratio against the Financial Services industry group benchmark.

P/S Ratio (TTM)

Nomura (NMR) at 0.01 sits in the cheaper P/S ratio quartile while Ares Capital (ARCC) at 4.48 prices around its industry’s middle — NMR costs less per dollar of sales, though read it alongside growth and margins.

ARCC

Financial Services industry group

4.48

Max
9.23
Q3
4.57
ARCC
4.48
Median
2.72
Q1
1.28
Min
-0.55

NMR

Financial Services industry group

0.01

Max
9.23
Q3
4.57
Median
2.72
Q1
1.28
NMR
0.01
Min
-0.55
Loading chart…
Ares Capital (ARCC) vs. Nomura (NMR): A comparison of their P/S ratio against the Financial Services industry group benchmark.

P/B Ratio (MRQ)

On P/B ratio, both Ares Capital (ARCC) at 0.99 and Nomura (NMR) at 1.15 are valued close to their industries’ norm against book — neither stands out from peers.

ARCC

Financial Services industry group

0.99

Max
7.79
Q3
3.63
Median
1.57
ARCC
0.99
Q1
0.81
Min
-0.39

NMR

Financial Services industry group

1.15

Max
7.79
Q3
3.63
Median
1.57
NMR
1.15
Q1
0.81
Min
-0.39
Loading chart…
Ares Capital (ARCC) vs. Nomura (NMR): A comparison of their P/B ratio against the Financial Services industry group benchmark.

Valuation Metrics

Valuation metrics for Ares Capital (ARCC) and Nomura (NMR)
MetricARCCNMR
P/E Ratio (TTM)15.6810.83
P/S Ratio (TTM)4.480.01
P/B Ratio (MRQ)0.991.15
Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM)----