AR vs. WMB: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
UpdatedHere’s a clear look at AR and WMB, comparing key factors like performance, valuation metrics, dividends, and financial strength. It’s built for investors or anyone curious to see how these two stocks match up.
Company Overview
WMB stands out with 70.35 billion USD in market value—about 5.79× AR’s market cap of 12.14 billion USD.
With betas of 0.66 for AR and 0.69 for WMB, both show similar volatility profiles relative to the overall market.
| Symbol | AR | WMB |
|---|---|---|
| Company Name | Antero Resources Corporation | The Williams Companies, Inc. |
| Country | US | US |
| Sector | Energy | Energy |
| Industry | Oil & Gas Exploration & Production | Oil & Gas Midstream |
| CEO | Mr. Paul M. Rady | Mr. Alan S. Armstrong |
| Price | 39.11 USD | 57.62 USD |
| Market Cap | 12.14 billion USD | 70.35 billion USD |
| Beta | 0.66 | 0.69 |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| IPO Date | October 10, 2013 | December 31, 1981 |
| ADR | No | No |
Performance Comparison
This chart compares the performance of AR and WMB over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).
Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.
Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Valuation Metrics Comparison
The section examines key financial ratios to assess the valuation of AR and WMB based on earnings, cash flow, sales, and book value. Pay attention to the following notable points where extreme values stand out.
- AR stands out with a premium P/E of 420.54, while WMB at 30.79 remains within a more conventional earnings multiple.
| Symbol | AR | WMB |
|---|---|---|
| Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM) | 420.54 | 30.79 |
| Forward PEG Ratio (TTM) | 124.18 | 2.60 |
| Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM) | 2.63 | 6.45 |
| Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM) | 1.69 | 5.63 |
| Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM) | 11.85 | 33.50 |
| EV-to-EBITDA (TTM) | 14.75 | 16.38 |
| EV-to-Sales (TTM) | 3.45 | 8.95 |
| EV-to-Free Cash Flow (TTM) | 15.56 | 46.51 |
Dividend Comparison
AR offers a 0% dividend yield, suggesting it may be reinvesting available cash back into the business for future growth, while WMB provides a 3.34% dividend yield, giving investors a steady income stream.
| Symbol | AR | WMB |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.00% | 3.34% |
Financial Strength Metrics Comparison
This section dives into the financial resilience of AR and WMB, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.
- With current ratios of 0.39 and 0.40, both AR and WMB have less current assets than short-term liabilities, which could strain their working capital and force reliance on additional financing.
- Both AR (quick ratio 0.39) and WMB (quick ratio 0.36) fall below 0.8, meaning their most liquid assets—excluding inventory—aren’t enough to meet short-term obligations. This could force them to rely on receivables, inventory turn, or external financing.
| Symbol | AR | WMB |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (TTM) | 0.39 | 0.40 |
| Quick Ratio (TTM) | 0.39 | 0.36 |
| Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM) | 0.53 | 2.20 |
| Debt-to-Assets Ratio (TTM) | 0.29 | 0.50 |
| Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | 2.35 | 5.26 |