AR vs. ET: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
UpdatedHere’s a clear look at AR and ET, comparing key factors like performance, valuation metrics, dividends, and financial strength. It’s built for investors or anyone curious to see how these two stocks match up.
Company Overview
ET stands out with 60.90 billion USD in market value—about 5.08× AR’s market cap of 11.98 billion USD.
With betas of 0.66 for AR and 0.73 for ET, both show similar volatility profiles relative to the overall market.
| Symbol | AR | ET |
|---|---|---|
| Company Name | Antero Resources Corporation | Energy Transfer LP |
| Country | US | US |
| Sector | Energy | Energy |
| Industry | Oil & Gas Exploration & Production | Oil & Gas Midstream |
| CEO | Mr. Paul M. Rady | Mr. Marshall S. McCrea III |
| Price | 38.57 USD | 17.745 USD |
| Market Cap | 11.98 billion USD | 60.90 billion USD |
| Beta | 0.66 | 0.73 |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| IPO Date | October 10, 2013 | February 3, 2006 |
| ADR | No | No |
Performance Comparison
This chart compares the performance of AR and ET over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).
Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.
Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Valuation Metrics Comparison
The section examines key financial ratios to assess the valuation of AR and ET based on earnings, cash flow, sales, and book value. Pay attention to the following notable points where extreme values stand out.
- AR stands out with a premium P/E of 414.74, while ET at 12.43 remains within a more conventional earnings multiple.
| Symbol | AR | ET |
|---|---|---|
| Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM) | 414.74 | 12.43 |
| Forward PEG Ratio (TTM) | 122.47 | 2.20 |
| Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM) | 2.59 | 0.74 |
| Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM) | 1.66 | 1.32 |
| Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM) | 11.68 | 5.55 |
| EV-to-EBITDA (TTM) | 14.59 | 4.55 |
| EV-to-Sales (TTM) | 3.42 | 0.75 |
| EV-to-Free Cash Flow (TTM) | 15.40 | 5.62 |
Dividend Comparison
AR offers a 0% dividend yield, suggesting it may be reinvesting available cash back into the business for future growth, while ET provides a 7.30% dividend yield, giving investors a steady income stream.
| Symbol | AR | ET |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.00% | 7.30% |
Financial Strength Metrics Comparison
This section dives into the financial resilience of AR and ET, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.
- With current ratios of 0.39 and 0.00, both AR and ET have less current assets than short-term liabilities, which could strain their working capital and force reliance on additional financing.
- Both AR (quick ratio 0.39) and ET (quick ratio 0.00) fall below 0.8, meaning their most liquid assets—excluding inventory—aren’t enough to meet short-term obligations. This could force them to rely on receivables, inventory turn, or external financing.
| Symbol | AR | ET |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (TTM) | 0.39 | 0.00 |
| Quick Ratio (TTM) | 0.39 | 0.00 |
| Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM) | 0.53 | 0.02 |
| Debt-to-Assets Ratio (TTM) | 0.29 | 0.00 |
| Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | 2.35 | 2.89 |