Seek Returns logo

AR vs. BKR: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at AR and BKR, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolARBKR
Company NameAntero Resources CorporationBaker Hughes Company
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorEnergyEnergy
GICS IndustryOil, Gas & Consumable FuelsEnergy Equipment & Services
Market Capitalization10.36 billion USD48.23 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENasdaqGS
Listing DateOctober 10, 2013April 6, 1987
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of AR and BKR by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

AR vs. BKR: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolARBKR
5-Day Price Return-3.03%-1.35%
13-Week Price Return8.53%10.61%
26-Week Price Return-15.47%26.80%
52-Week Price Return4.39%12.13%
Month-to-Date Return7.80%-0.70%
Year-to-Date Return-4.94%17.19%
10-Day Avg. Volume4.97M6.46M
3-Month Avg. Volume4.87M7.14M
3-Month Volatility37.46%29.41%
Beta0.500.88

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

AR

7.58%

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
26.72%
Q3
16.09%
Median
9.55%
Q1
5.28%
Min
-10.03%

AR’s Return on Equity of 7.58% is on par with the norm for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

BKR

16.57%

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
29.69%
Q3
19.07%
Median
12.78%
Q1
7.78%
Min
-4.04%

BKR’s Return on Equity of 16.57% is on par with the norm for the Energy Equipment & Services industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

AR vs. BKR: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels and Energy Equipment & Services industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

AR

10.88%

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
43.98%
Q3
20.46%
Median
8.67%
Q1
2.52%
Min
-7.11%

AR’s Net Profit Margin of 10.88% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

BKR

10.43%

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
16.51%
Q3
8.94%
Median
5.91%
Q1
3.84%
Min
-2.81%

A Net Profit Margin of 10.43% places BKR in the upper quartile for the Energy Equipment & Services industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

AR vs. BKR: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels and Energy Equipment & Services industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

AR

11.80%

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
62.28%
Q3
30.55%
Median
17.92%
Q1
6.58%
Min
-25.19%

AR’s Operating Profit Margin of 11.80% is around the midpoint for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

BKR

11.57%

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
33.80%
Q3
17.55%
Median
11.05%
Q1
4.67%
Min
-1.49%

BKR’s Operating Profit Margin of 11.57% is around the midpoint for the Energy Equipment & Services industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

AR vs. BKR: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels and Energy Equipment & Services industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolARBKR
Return on Equity (TTM)7.58%16.57%
Return on Assets (TTM)4.23%7.49%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)10.88%10.43%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)11.80%11.57%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)71.08%23.07%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

AR

0.31

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
2.59
Q3
1.69
Median
1.23
Q1
0.85
Min
0.31

AR’s Current Ratio of 0.31 falls into the lower quartile for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

BKR

1.41

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
2.55
Q3
2.08
Median
1.41
Q1
1.07
Min
0.70

BKR’s Current Ratio of 1.41 aligns with the median group of the Energy Equipment & Services industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

AR vs. BKR: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels and Energy Equipment & Services industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

AR

0.18

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
2.24
Q3
1.06
Median
0.53
Q1
0.25
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, AR’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.18 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

BKR

0.33

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
2.09
Q3
1.06
Median
0.48
Q1
0.33
Min
0.02

BKR’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.33 is typical for the Energy Equipment & Services industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

AR vs. BKR: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels and Energy Equipment & Services industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

AR

-0.00

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
41.04
Q3
20.96
Median
7.19
Q1
2.54
Min
-19.25

AR has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -0.00. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

BKR

1.04

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
49.88
Q3
27.00
Median
9.96
Q1
2.52
Min
-17.36

In the lower quartile for the Energy Equipment & Services industry, BKR’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 1.04 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

AR vs. BKR: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels and Energy Equipment & Services industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolARBKR
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.311.41
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.301.00
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.180.33
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)-0.001.04

Growth

Revenue Growth

AR vs. BKR: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

AR vs. BKR: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

AR

0.00%

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
11.17%
Q3
6.18%
Median
4.23%
Q1
2.56%
Min
0.00%

AR currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

BKR

1.83%

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
7.69%
Q3
4.11%
Median
2.39%
Q1
0.24%
Min
0.00%

BKR’s Dividend Yield of 1.83% is consistent with its peers in the Energy Equipment & Services industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

AR vs. BKR: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels and Energy Equipment & Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

AR

0.00%

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
177.24%
Q3
98.32%
Median
58.16%
Q1
28.57%
Min
0.00%

AR has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

BKR

30.82%

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
169.85%
Q3
97.80%
Median
44.61%
Q1
15.01%
Min
0.00%

BKR’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 30.82% is within the typical range for the Energy Equipment & Services industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

AR vs. BKR: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels and Energy Equipment & Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolARBKR
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%1.83%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%30.82%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

AR

18.77

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
38.10
Q3
21.29
Median
13.95
Q1
9.93
Min
2.48

AR’s P/E Ratio of 18.77 is within the middle range for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

BKR

16.82

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
26.39
Q3
20.56
Median
14.49
Q1
10.91
Min
7.44

BKR’s P/E Ratio of 16.82 is within the middle range for the Energy Equipment & Services industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

AR vs. BKR: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels and Energy Equipment & Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

AR

2.04

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
4.76
Q3
2.81
Median
1.43
Q1
0.60
Min
0.15

AR’s P/S Ratio of 2.04 aligns with the market consensus for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

BKR

1.75

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
2.92
Q3
1.59
Median
0.89
Q1
0.57
Min
0.20

BKR’s P/S Ratio of 1.75 is in the upper echelon for the Energy Equipment & Services industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

AR vs. BKR: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels and Energy Equipment & Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

AR

1.41

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
3.63
Q3
2.11
Median
1.41
Q1
0.94
Min
0.45

AR’s P/B Ratio of 1.41 is within the conventional range for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

BKR

2.65

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
4.87
Q3
2.69
Median
1.77
Q1
1.14
Min
0.43

BKR’s P/B Ratio of 2.65 is within the conventional range for the Energy Equipment & Services industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

AR vs. BKR: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels and Energy Equipment & Services industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolARBKR
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)18.7716.82
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)2.041.75
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)1.412.65
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)12.9823.27