Seek Returns logo

APTV vs. VIPS: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at APTV and VIPS, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

APTV is a standard domestic listing, while VIPS trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors access to its foreign-listed shares.

SymbolAPTVVIPS
Company NameAptiv PLCVipshop Holdings Limited
CountrySwitzerlandChina
GICS SectorConsumer DiscretionaryConsumer Discretionary
GICS IndustryAutomobile ComponentsBroadline Retail
Market Capitalization16.36 billion USD8.51 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateNovember 17, 2011March 23, 2012
Security TypeCommon StockADR

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of APTV and VIPS by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

APTV vs. VIPS: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolAPTVVIPS
5-Day Price Return1.16%2.62%
13-Week Price Return11.60%19.53%
26-Week Price Return13.16%17.18%
52-Week Price Return5.86%35.91%
Month-to-Date Return9.48%14.38%
Year-to-Date Return24.26%28.14%
10-Day Avg. Volume2.63M2.88M
3-Month Avg. Volume2.48M3.20M
3-Month Volatility33.73%27.56%
Beta1.550.71

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

APTV

11.15%

Automobile Components Industry

Max
22.61%
Q3
12.61%
Median
8.05%
Q1
4.99%
Min
-4.24%

APTV’s Return on Equity of 11.15% is on par with the norm for the Automobile Components industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

VIPS

18.88%

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
49.17%
Q3
28.98%
Median
19.22%
Q1
10.86%
Min
-11.14%

VIPS’s Return on Equity of 18.88% is on par with the norm for the Broadline Retail industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

APTV vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Automobile Components and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

APTV

5.12%

Automobile Components Industry

Max
14.35%
Q3
7.20%
Median
5.37%
Q1
2.20%
Min
-3.89%

APTV’s Net Profit Margin of 5.12% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Automobile Components industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

VIPS

6.88%

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
19.78%
Q3
11.90%
Median
8.63%
Q1
5.21%
Min
0.82%

VIPS’s Net Profit Margin of 6.88% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Broadline Retail industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

APTV vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Automobile Components and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

APTV

6.35%

Automobile Components Industry

Max
18.98%
Q3
10.24%
Median
7.27%
Q1
4.13%
Min
0.23%

APTV’s Operating Profit Margin of 6.35% is around the midpoint for the Automobile Components industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

VIPS

8.06%

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
27.23%
Q3
15.96%
Median
11.13%
Q1
8.31%
Min
1.77%

VIPS’s Operating Profit Margin of 8.06% is in the lower quartile for the Broadline Retail industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

APTV vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Automobile Components and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolAPTVVIPS
Return on Equity (TTM)11.15%18.88%
Return on Assets (TTM)4.25%10.28%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)5.12%6.88%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)6.35%8.06%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)19.11%23.36%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

APTV

1.76

Automobile Components Industry

Max
4.06
Q3
2.51
Median
1.80
Q1
1.47
Min
0.79

APTV’s Current Ratio of 1.76 aligns with the median group of the Automobile Components industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

VIPS

1.28

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
3.54
Q3
2.42
Median
1.49
Q1
1.22
Min
0.67

VIPS’s Current Ratio of 1.28 aligns with the median group of the Broadline Retail industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

APTV vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Automobile Components and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

APTV

0.80

Automobile Components Industry

Max
1.25
Q3
0.63
Median
0.37
Q1
0.18
Min
0.00

APTV’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Automobile Components industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.80. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

VIPS

0.11

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
2.14
Q3
1.34
Median
0.63
Q1
0.27
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Broadline Retail industry, VIPS’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.11 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

APTV vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Automobile Components and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

APTV

8.43

Automobile Components Industry

Max
88.53
Q3
38.84
Median
11.36
Q1
5.08
Min
-21.51

APTV’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 8.43 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Automobile Components industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

VIPS

150.47

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
37.34
Q3
20.63
Median
11.28
Q1
4.22
Min
-19.29

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 150.47, VIPS demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Broadline Retail industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

APTV vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Automobile Components and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolAPTVVIPS
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.761.28
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.221.14
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.800.11
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)8.43150.47

Growth

Revenue Growth

APTV vs. VIPS: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

APTV vs. VIPS: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

APTV

0.00%

Automobile Components Industry

Max
6.03%
Q3
3.38%
Median
2.62%
Q1
1.38%
Min
0.00%

APTV currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

VIPS

0.00%

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
5.46%
Q3
2.38%
Median
0.43%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

VIPS currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

APTV vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Automobile Components and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

APTV

0.00%

Automobile Components Industry

Max
95.56%
Q3
55.95%
Median
37.10%
Q1
27.90%
Min
0.00%

APTV has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

VIPS

0.00%

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
131.17%
Q3
63.48%
Median
29.43%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

VIPS has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

APTV vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Automobile Components and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolAPTVVIPS
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

APTV

16.15

Automobile Components Industry

Max
26.62
Q3
17.42
Median
13.22
Q1
11.14
Min
2.52

APTV’s P/E Ratio of 16.15 is within the middle range for the Automobile Components industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

VIPS

7.97

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
66.12
Q3
35.17
Median
16.29
Q1
10.47
Min
5.94

In the lower quartile for the Broadline Retail industry, VIPS’s P/E Ratio of 7.97 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

APTV vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Automobile Components and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

APTV

0.83

Automobile Components Industry

Max
1.81
Q3
0.97
Median
0.71
Q1
0.38
Min
0.08

APTV’s P/S Ratio of 0.83 aligns with the market consensus for the Automobile Components industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

VIPS

0.55

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
5.40
Q3
3.33
Median
2.04
Q1
0.80
Min
0.16

In the lower quartile for the Broadline Retail industry, VIPS’s P/S Ratio of 0.55 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

APTV vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Automobile Components and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

APTV

1.53

Automobile Components Industry

Max
2.49
Q3
1.49
Median
0.93
Q1
0.78
Min
0.40

APTV’s P/B Ratio of 1.53 is in the upper tier for the Automobile Components industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

VIPS

1.43

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
9.06
Q3
5.22
Median
3.48
Q1
1.90
Min
0.74

VIPS’s P/B Ratio of 1.43 is in the lower quartile for the Broadline Retail industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

APTV vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Automobile Components and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolAPTVVIPS
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)16.157.97
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)0.830.55
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)1.531.43
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)9.87--