Seek Returns logo

APTV vs. LULU: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at APTV and LULU, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolAPTVLULU
Company NameAptiv PLClululemon athletica inc.
CountrySwitzerlandCanada
GICS SectorConsumer DiscretionaryConsumer Discretionary
GICS IndustryAutomobile ComponentsTextiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods
Market Capitalization17.02 billion USD20.02 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENasdaqGS
Listing DateNovember 17, 2011July 27, 2007
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of APTV and LULU by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

APTV vs. LULU: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolAPTVLULU
5-Day Price Return-4.42%0.19%
13-Week Price Return6.38%-14.00%
26-Week Price Return14.71%-45.05%
52-Week Price Return40.56%-48.01%
Month-to-Date Return-2.70%0.08%
Year-to-Date Return30.47%-55.37%
10-Day Avg. Volume2.43M3.23M
3-Month Avg. Volume2.27M4.56M
3-Month Volatility25.62%50.25%
Beta1.511.03

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

APTV

3.21%

Automobile Components Industry

Max
22.69%
Q3
11.79%
Median
7.47%
Q1
4.51%
Min
-2.79%

APTV’s Return on Equity of 3.21% is in the lower quartile for the Automobile Components industry. This indicates a less efficient generation of profit from its equity base when compared to its competitors.

LULU

42.05%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
46.95%
Q3
26.41%
Median
17.82%
Q1
9.41%
Min
-8.23%

In the upper quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, LULU’s Return on Equity of 42.05% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

APTV vs. LULU: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Automobile Components and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

APTV

1.46%

Automobile Components Industry

Max
14.12%
Q3
7.20%
Median
4.94%
Q1
1.95%
Min
-3.89%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Automobile Components industry, APTV’s Net Profit Margin of 1.46% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

LULU

16.38%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
21.16%
Q3
13.26%
Median
7.68%
Q1
4.48%
Min
-3.05%

A Net Profit Margin of 16.38% places LULU in the upper quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

APTV vs. LULU: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Automobile Components and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

APTV

2.95%

Automobile Components Industry

Max
19.04%
Q3
10.47%
Median
6.63%
Q1
3.48%
Min
-2.44%

APTV’s Operating Profit Margin of 2.95% is in the lower quartile for the Automobile Components industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

LULU

22.88%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
28.42%
Q3
20.87%
Median
12.08%
Q1
6.65%
Min
-0.12%

An Operating Profit Margin of 22.88% places LULU in the upper quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

APTV vs. LULU: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Automobile Components and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolAPTVLULU
Return on Equity (TTM)3.21%42.05%
Return on Assets (TTM)1.26%24.10%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)1.46%16.38%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)2.95%22.88%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)19.34%59.10%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

APTV

1.79

Automobile Components Industry

Max
4.13
Q3
2.54
Median
1.80
Q1
1.42
Min
0.79

APTV’s Current Ratio of 1.79 aligns with the median group of the Automobile Components industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

LULU

2.27

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
3.07
Q3
2.20
Median
1.62
Q1
1.47
Min
0.70

LULU’s Current Ratio of 2.27 is in the upper quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

APTV vs. LULU: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Automobile Components and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

APTV

0.82

Automobile Components Industry

Max
1.14
Q3
0.66
Median
0.38
Q1
0.21
Min
0.00

APTV’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Automobile Components industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.82. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

LULU

0.00

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
2.53
Q3
1.30
Median
0.59
Q1
0.27
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, LULU’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.00 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

APTV vs. LULU: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Automobile Components and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

APTV

8.43

Automobile Components Industry

Max
80.10
Q3
36.86
Median
11.36
Q1
4.46
Min
-21.51

APTV’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 8.43 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Automobile Components industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

LULU

-47.83

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
85.38
Q3
37.37
Median
8.62
Q1
4.18
Min
-32.49

LULU has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -47.83. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

APTV vs. LULU: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Automobile Components and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolAPTVLULU
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.792.27
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.240.85
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.820.00
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)8.43-47.83

Growth

Revenue Growth

APTV vs. LULU: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

APTV vs. LULU: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

APTV

0.00%

Automobile Components Industry

Max
4.83%
Q3
3.13%
Median
2.50%
Q1
1.22%
Min
0.00%

APTV currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

LULU

0.00%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
4.60%
Q3
3.43%
Median
2.28%
Q1
1.12%
Min
0.00%

LULU currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

APTV vs. LULU: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Automobile Components and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

APTV

0.00%

Automobile Components Industry

Max
99.04%
Q3
62.52%
Median
37.81%
Q1
27.27%
Min
0.00%

APTV has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

LULU

0.00%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
156.63%
Q3
96.75%
Median
57.64%
Q1
34.78%
Min
0.00%

LULU has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

APTV vs. LULU: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Automobile Components and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolAPTVLULU
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

APTV

57.21

Automobile Components Industry

Max
28.01
Q3
22.74
Median
15.58
Q1
12.96
Min
2.71

At 57.21, APTV’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Automobile Components industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

LULU

11.82

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
76.57
Q3
39.44
Median
22.87
Q1
14.62
Min
7.99

In the lower quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, LULU’s P/E Ratio of 11.82 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

APTV vs. LULU: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Automobile Components and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

APTV

0.84

Automobile Components Industry

Max
2.05
Q3
1.12
Median
0.78
Q1
0.46
Min
0.08

APTV’s P/S Ratio of 0.84 aligns with the market consensus for the Automobile Components industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

LULU

1.94

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
5.07
Q3
2.88
Median
1.80
Q1
0.93
Min
0.28

LULU’s P/S Ratio of 1.94 aligns with the market consensus for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

APTV vs. LULU: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Automobile Components and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

APTV

2.02

Automobile Components Industry

Max
3.68
Q3
2.06
Median
1.25
Q1
0.90
Min
0.46

APTV’s P/B Ratio of 2.02 is within the conventional range for the Automobile Components industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

LULU

5.37

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
11.14
Q3
5.70
Median
3.35
Q1
2.02
Min
0.56

LULU’s P/B Ratio of 5.37 is within the conventional range for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

APTV vs. LULU: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Automobile Components and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolAPTVLULU
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)57.2111.82
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)0.841.94
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)2.025.37
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)9.5214.67