Seek Returns logo

APTV vs. LEA: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at APTV and LEA, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolAPTVLEA
Company NameAptiv PLCLear Corporation
CountrySwitzerlandUnited States
GICS SectorConsumer DiscretionaryConsumer Discretionary
GICS IndustryAutomobile ComponentsAutomobile Components
Market Capitalization16.36 billion USD5.48 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateNovember 17, 2011November 9, 2009
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of APTV and LEA by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

APTV vs. LEA: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolAPTVLEA
5-Day Price Return1.16%-0.26%
13-Week Price Return11.60%9.51%
26-Week Price Return13.16%6.99%
52-Week Price Return5.86%-10.20%
Month-to-Date Return9.48%9.29%
Year-to-Date Return24.26%8.82%
10-Day Avg. Volume2.63M0.50M
3-Month Avg. Volume2.48M0.66M
3-Month Volatility33.73%34.39%
Beta1.551.36

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

APTV

11.15%

Automobile Components Industry

Max
22.61%
Q3
12.61%
Median
8.05%
Q1
4.99%
Min
-4.24%

APTV’s Return on Equity of 11.15% is on par with the norm for the Automobile Components industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

LEA

9.91%

Automobile Components Industry

Max
22.61%
Q3
12.61%
Median
8.05%
Q1
4.99%
Min
-4.24%

LEA’s Return on Equity of 9.91% is on par with the norm for the Automobile Components industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

APTV vs. LEA: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against the Automobile Components industry benchmark.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

APTV

5.12%

Automobile Components Industry

Max
14.35%
Q3
7.20%
Median
5.37%
Q1
2.20%
Min
-3.89%

APTV’s Net Profit Margin of 5.12% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Automobile Components industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

LEA

2.05%

Automobile Components Industry

Max
14.35%
Q3
7.20%
Median
5.37%
Q1
2.20%
Min
-3.89%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Automobile Components industry, LEA’s Net Profit Margin of 2.05% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

APTV vs. LEA: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against the Automobile Components industry benchmark.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

APTV

6.35%

Automobile Components Industry

Max
18.98%
Q3
10.24%
Median
7.27%
Q1
4.13%
Min
0.23%

APTV’s Operating Profit Margin of 6.35% is around the midpoint for the Automobile Components industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

LEA

3.54%

Automobile Components Industry

Max
18.98%
Q3
10.24%
Median
7.27%
Q1
4.13%
Min
0.23%

LEA’s Operating Profit Margin of 3.54% is in the lower quartile for the Automobile Components industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

APTV vs. LEA: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against the Automobile Components industry benchmark.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolAPTVLEA
Return on Equity (TTM)11.15%9.91%
Return on Assets (TTM)4.25%3.20%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)5.12%2.05%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)6.35%3.54%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)19.11%7.66%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

APTV

1.76

Automobile Components Industry

Max
4.06
Q3
2.51
Median
1.80
Q1
1.47
Min
0.79

APTV’s Current Ratio of 1.76 aligns with the median group of the Automobile Components industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

LEA

1.34

Automobile Components Industry

Max
4.06
Q3
2.51
Median
1.80
Q1
1.47
Min
0.79

LEA’s Current Ratio of 1.34 falls into the lower quartile for the Automobile Components industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

APTV vs. LEA: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against the Automobile Components industry benchmark.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

APTV

0.80

Automobile Components Industry

Max
1.25
Q3
0.63
Median
0.37
Q1
0.18
Min
0.00

APTV’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Automobile Components industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.80. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

LEA

0.55

Automobile Components Industry

Max
1.25
Q3
0.63
Median
0.37
Q1
0.18
Min
0.00

LEA’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.55 is typical for the Automobile Components industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

APTV vs. LEA: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against the Automobile Components industry benchmark.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

APTV

8.43

Automobile Components Industry

Max
88.53
Q3
38.84
Median
11.36
Q1
5.08
Min
-21.51

APTV’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 8.43 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Automobile Components industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

LEA

6.74

Automobile Components Industry

Max
88.53
Q3
38.84
Median
11.36
Q1
5.08
Min
-21.51

LEA’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 6.74 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Automobile Components industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

APTV vs. LEA: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against the Automobile Components industry benchmark.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolAPTVLEA
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.761.34
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.221.07
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.800.55
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)8.436.74

Growth

Revenue Growth

APTV vs. LEA: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

APTV vs. LEA: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

APTV

0.00%

Automobile Components Industry

Max
6.03%
Q3
3.38%
Median
2.62%
Q1
1.38%
Min
0.00%

APTV currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

LEA

3.08%

Automobile Components Industry

Max
6.03%
Q3
3.38%
Median
2.62%
Q1
1.38%
Min
0.00%

LEA’s Dividend Yield of 3.08% is consistent with its peers in the Automobile Components industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

APTV vs. LEA: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against the Automobile Components industry benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

APTV

0.00%

Automobile Components Industry

Max
95.56%
Q3
55.95%
Median
37.10%
Q1
27.90%
Min
0.00%

APTV has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

LEA

35.99%

Automobile Components Industry

Max
95.56%
Q3
55.95%
Median
37.10%
Q1
27.90%
Min
0.00%

LEA’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 35.99% is within the typical range for the Automobile Components industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

APTV vs. LEA: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against the Automobile Components industry benchmark.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolAPTVLEA
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%3.08%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%35.99%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

APTV

16.15

Automobile Components Industry

Max
26.62
Q3
17.42
Median
13.22
Q1
11.14
Min
2.52

APTV’s P/E Ratio of 16.15 is within the middle range for the Automobile Components industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

LEA

11.70

Automobile Components Industry

Max
26.62
Q3
17.42
Median
13.22
Q1
11.14
Min
2.52

LEA’s P/E Ratio of 11.70 is within the middle range for the Automobile Components industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

APTV vs. LEA: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against the Automobile Components industry benchmark.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

APTV

0.83

Automobile Components Industry

Max
1.81
Q3
0.97
Median
0.71
Q1
0.38
Min
0.08

APTV’s P/S Ratio of 0.83 aligns with the market consensus for the Automobile Components industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

LEA

0.24

Automobile Components Industry

Max
1.81
Q3
0.97
Median
0.71
Q1
0.38
Min
0.08

In the lower quartile for the Automobile Components industry, LEA’s P/S Ratio of 0.24 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

APTV vs. LEA: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against the Automobile Components industry benchmark.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

APTV

1.53

Automobile Components Industry

Max
2.49
Q3
1.49
Median
0.93
Q1
0.78
Min
0.40

APTV’s P/B Ratio of 1.53 is in the upper tier for the Automobile Components industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

LEA

1.00

Automobile Components Industry

Max
2.49
Q3
1.49
Median
0.93
Q1
0.78
Min
0.40

LEA’s P/B Ratio of 1.00 is within the conventional range for the Automobile Components industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

APTV vs. LEA: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against the Automobile Components industry benchmark.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolAPTVLEA
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)16.1511.70
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)0.830.24
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)1.531.00
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)9.877.74