Seek Returns logo

APTV vs. F: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at APTV and F, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolAPTVF
Company NameAptiv PLCFord Motor Company
CountrySwitzerlandUnited States
GICS SectorConsumer DiscretionaryConsumer Discretionary
GICS IndustryAutomobile ComponentsAutomobiles
Market Capitalization17.02 billion USD51.98 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateNovember 17, 2011June 1, 1972
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of APTV and F by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

APTV vs. F: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolAPTVF
5-Day Price Return-4.42%0.23%
13-Week Price Return6.38%15.30%
26-Week Price Return14.71%24.43%
52-Week Price Return40.56%18.83%
Month-to-Date Return-2.70%0.46%
Year-to-Date Return30.47%33.23%
10-Day Avg. Volume2.43M73.53M
3-Month Avg. Volume2.27M83.17M
3-Month Volatility25.62%35.87%
Beta1.511.63

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

APTV

3.21%

Automobile Components Industry

Max
22.69%
Q3
11.79%
Median
7.47%
Q1
4.51%
Min
-2.79%

APTV’s Return on Equity of 3.21% is in the lower quartile for the Automobile Components industry. This indicates a less efficient generation of profit from its equity base when compared to its competitors.

F

10.35%

Automobiles Industry

Max
28.52%
Q3
12.92%
Median
5.04%
Q1
-1.15%
Min
-15.36%

F’s Return on Equity of 10.35% is on par with the norm for the Automobiles industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

APTV vs. F: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Automobile Components and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

APTV

1.46%

Automobile Components Industry

Max
14.12%
Q3
7.20%
Median
4.94%
Q1
1.95%
Min
-3.89%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Automobile Components industry, APTV’s Net Profit Margin of 1.46% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

F

2.48%

Automobiles Industry

Max
10.74%
Q3
5.64%
Median
2.77%
Q1
-0.52%
Min
-6.61%

F’s Net Profit Margin of 2.48% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Automobiles industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

APTV vs. F: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Automobile Components and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

APTV

2.95%

Automobile Components Industry

Max
19.04%
Q3
10.47%
Median
6.63%
Q1
3.48%
Min
-2.44%

APTV’s Operating Profit Margin of 2.95% is in the lower quartile for the Automobile Components industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

F

1.91%

Automobiles Industry

Max
13.07%
Q3
7.22%
Median
4.62%
Q1
-0.45%
Min
-6.16%

F’s Operating Profit Margin of 1.91% is around the midpoint for the Automobiles industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

APTV vs. F: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Automobile Components and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolAPTVF
Return on Equity (TTM)3.21%10.35%
Return on Assets (TTM)1.26%1.62%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)1.46%2.48%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)2.95%1.91%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)19.34%7.53%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

APTV

1.79

Automobile Components Industry

Max
4.13
Q3
2.54
Median
1.80
Q1
1.42
Min
0.79

APTV’s Current Ratio of 1.79 aligns with the median group of the Automobile Components industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

F

1.12

Automobiles Industry

Max
2.13
Q3
1.58
Median
1.28
Q1
1.09
Min
0.47

F’s Current Ratio of 1.12 aligns with the median group of the Automobiles industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

APTV vs. F: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Automobile Components and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

APTV

0.82

Automobile Components Industry

Max
1.14
Q3
0.66
Median
0.38
Q1
0.21
Min
0.00

APTV’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Automobile Components industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.82. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

F

3.42

Automobiles Industry

Max
2.00
Q3
1.15
Median
0.60
Q1
0.28
Min
0.05

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 3.42, F operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Automobiles industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

APTV vs. F: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Automobile Components and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

APTV

8.43

Automobile Components Industry

Max
80.10
Q3
36.86
Median
11.36
Q1
4.46
Min
-21.51

APTV’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 8.43 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Automobile Components industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

F

0.73

Automobiles Industry

Max
77.87
Q3
35.88
Median
13.88
Q1
3.52
Min
-19.31

F’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 0.73 is a critical concern. A value below 1.0 means operating earnings are insufficient to cover interest expenses, indicating severe financial strain and high default risk.

APTV vs. F: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Automobile Components and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolAPTVF
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.791.12
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.240.98
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.823.42
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)8.430.73

Growth

Revenue Growth

APTV vs. F: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

APTV vs. F: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

APTV

0.00%

Automobile Components Industry

Max
4.83%
Q3
3.13%
Median
2.50%
Q1
1.22%
Min
0.00%

APTV currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

F

5.68%

Automobiles Industry

Max
10.18%
Q3
4.88%
Median
2.84%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 5.68%, F offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Automobiles industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

APTV vs. F: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Automobile Components and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

APTV

0.00%

Automobile Components Industry

Max
99.04%
Q3
62.52%
Median
37.81%
Q1
27.27%
Min
0.00%

APTV has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

F

50.38%

Automobiles Industry

Max
114.43%
Q3
60.59%
Median
39.48%
Q1
20.22%
Min
0.00%

F’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 50.38% is within the typical range for the Automobiles industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

APTV vs. F: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Automobile Components and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolAPTVF
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%5.68%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%50.38%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

APTV

57.21

Automobile Components Industry

Max
28.01
Q3
22.74
Median
15.58
Q1
12.96
Min
2.71

At 57.21, APTV’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Automobile Components industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

F

11.17

Automobiles Industry

Max
31.96
Q3
22.07
Median
11.17
Q1
8.41
Min
5.02

F’s P/E Ratio of 11.17 is within the middle range for the Automobiles industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

APTV vs. F: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Automobile Components and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

APTV

0.84

Automobile Components Industry

Max
2.05
Q3
1.12
Median
0.78
Q1
0.46
Min
0.08

APTV’s P/S Ratio of 0.84 aligns with the market consensus for the Automobile Components industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

F

0.28

Automobiles Industry

Max
1.29
Q3
0.84
Median
0.51
Q1
0.27
Min
0.08

F’s P/S Ratio of 0.28 aligns with the market consensus for the Automobiles industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

APTV vs. F: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Automobile Components and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

APTV

2.02

Automobile Components Industry

Max
3.68
Q3
2.06
Median
1.25
Q1
0.90
Min
0.46

APTV’s P/B Ratio of 2.02 is within the conventional range for the Automobile Components industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

F

1.00

Automobiles Industry

Max
3.99
Q3
1.96
Median
0.87
Q1
0.46
Min
0.18

F’s P/B Ratio of 1.00 is within the conventional range for the Automobiles industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

APTV vs. F: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Automobile Components and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolAPTVF
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)57.2111.17
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)0.840.28
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)2.021.00
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)9.524.42