Seek Returns logo

APTV vs. DECK: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at APTV and DECK, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolAPTVDECK
Company NameAptiv PLCDeckers Outdoor Corporation
CountrySwitzerlandUnited States
GICS SectorConsumer DiscretionaryConsumer Discretionary
GICS IndustryAutomobile ComponentsTextiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods
Market Capitalization16.36 billion USD15.44 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateNovember 17, 2011October 15, 1993
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of APTV and DECK by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

APTV vs. DECK: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolAPTVDECK
5-Day Price Return1.16%0.18%
13-Week Price Return11.60%-18.33%
26-Week Price Return13.16%-34.19%
52-Week Price Return5.86%-35.19%
Month-to-Date Return9.48%-2.00%
Year-to-Date Return24.26%-48.77%
10-Day Avg. Volume2.63M2.53M
3-Month Avg. Volume2.48M3.43M
3-Month Volatility33.73%58.59%
Beta1.551.11

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

APTV

11.15%

Automobile Components Industry

Max
22.61%
Q3
12.61%
Median
8.05%
Q1
4.99%
Min
-4.24%

APTV’s Return on Equity of 11.15% is on par with the norm for the Automobile Components industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

DECK

40.25%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
53.33%
Q3
26.13%
Median
18.47%
Q1
7.99%
Min
-10.49%

In the upper quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, DECK’s Return on Equity of 40.25% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

APTV vs. DECK: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Automobile Components and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

APTV

5.12%

Automobile Components Industry

Max
14.35%
Q3
7.20%
Median
5.37%
Q1
2.20%
Min
-3.89%

APTV’s Net Profit Margin of 5.12% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Automobile Components industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

DECK

19.31%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
23.35%
Q3
13.49%
Median
8.45%
Q1
4.18%
Min
-3.90%

A Net Profit Margin of 19.31% places DECK in the upper quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

APTV vs. DECK: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Automobile Components and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

APTV

6.35%

Automobile Components Industry

Max
18.98%
Q3
10.24%
Median
7.27%
Q1
4.13%
Min
0.23%

APTV’s Operating Profit Margin of 6.35% is around the midpoint for the Automobile Components industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

DECK

23.64%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
29.47%
Q3
20.87%
Median
13.00%
Q1
7.02%
Min
-3.59%

An Operating Profit Margin of 23.64% places DECK in the upper quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

APTV vs. DECK: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Automobile Components and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolAPTVDECK
Return on Equity (TTM)11.15%40.25%
Return on Assets (TTM)4.25%26.80%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)5.12%19.31%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)6.35%23.64%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)19.11%57.63%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

APTV

1.76

Automobile Components Industry

Max
4.06
Q3
2.51
Median
1.80
Q1
1.47
Min
0.79

APTV’s Current Ratio of 1.76 aligns with the median group of the Automobile Components industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

DECK

2.94

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
3.91
Q3
2.49
Median
1.89
Q1
1.43
Min
0.80

DECK’s Current Ratio of 2.94 is in the upper quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

APTV vs. DECK: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Automobile Components and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

APTV

0.80

Automobile Components Industry

Max
1.25
Q3
0.63
Median
0.37
Q1
0.18
Min
0.00

APTV’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Automobile Components industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.80. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

DECK

0.00

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
2.67
Q3
1.29
Median
0.59
Q1
0.24
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, DECK’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.00 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

APTV vs. DECK: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Automobile Components and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

APTV

8.43

Automobile Components Industry

Max
88.53
Q3
38.84
Median
11.36
Q1
5.08
Min
-21.51

APTV’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 8.43 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Automobile Components industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

DECK

713.03

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
57.00
Q3
35.85
Median
9.20
Q1
4.29
Min
-32.49

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 713.03, DECK demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

APTV vs. DECK: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Automobile Components and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolAPTVDECK
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.762.94
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.222.08
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.800.00
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)8.43713.03

Growth

Revenue Growth

APTV vs. DECK: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

APTV vs. DECK: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

APTV

0.00%

Automobile Components Industry

Max
6.03%
Q3
3.38%
Median
2.62%
Q1
1.38%
Min
0.00%

APTV currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

DECK

0.00%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
6.59%
Q3
3.60%
Median
2.59%
Q1
0.95%
Min
0.00%

DECK currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

APTV vs. DECK: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Automobile Components and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

APTV

0.00%

Automobile Components Industry

Max
95.56%
Q3
55.95%
Median
37.10%
Q1
27.90%
Min
0.00%

APTV has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

DECK

0.00%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
195.44%
Q3
106.47%
Median
58.77%
Q1
36.52%
Min
0.00%

DECK has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

APTV vs. DECK: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Automobile Components and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolAPTVDECK
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

APTV

16.15

Automobile Components Industry

Max
26.62
Q3
17.42
Median
13.22
Q1
11.14
Min
2.52

APTV’s P/E Ratio of 16.15 is within the middle range for the Automobile Components industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

DECK

15.86

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
63.29
Q3
34.64
Median
18.01
Q1
13.88
Min
6.04

DECK’s P/E Ratio of 15.86 is within the middle range for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

APTV vs. DECK: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Automobile Components and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

APTV

0.83

Automobile Components Industry

Max
1.81
Q3
0.97
Median
0.71
Q1
0.38
Min
0.08

APTV’s P/S Ratio of 0.83 aligns with the market consensus for the Automobile Components industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

DECK

3.06

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
5.46
Q3
3.13
Median
1.72
Q1
0.83
Min
0.26

DECK’s P/S Ratio of 3.06 aligns with the market consensus for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

APTV vs. DECK: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Automobile Components and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

APTV

1.53

Automobile Components Industry

Max
2.49
Q3
1.49
Median
0.93
Q1
0.78
Min
0.40

APTV’s P/B Ratio of 1.53 is in the upper tier for the Automobile Components industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

DECK

6.24

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
9.76
Q3
6.00
Median
3.26
Q1
1.97
Min
0.69

DECK’s P/B Ratio of 6.24 is in the upper tier for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

APTV vs. DECK: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Automobile Components and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolAPTVDECK
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)16.1515.86
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)0.833.06
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)1.536.24
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)9.8714.49