Seek Returns logo

APTV vs. CCL: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at APTV and CCL, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolAPTVCCL
Company NameAptiv PLCCarnival Corporation & plc
CountrySwitzerlandUnited States
GICS SectorConsumer DiscretionaryConsumer Discretionary
GICS IndustryAutomobile ComponentsHotels, Restaurants & Leisure
Market Capitalization16.36 billion USD39.67 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateNovember 17, 2011July 24, 1987
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of APTV and CCL by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

APTV vs. CCL: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolAPTVCCL
5-Day Price Return1.16%-3.27%
13-Week Price Return11.60%25.10%
26-Week Price Return13.16%13.15%
52-Week Price Return5.86%87.56%
Month-to-Date Return9.48%-1.71%
Year-to-Date Return24.26%17.42%
10-Day Avg. Volume2.63M15.58M
3-Month Avg. Volume2.48M22.35M
3-Month Volatility33.73%36.62%
Beta1.552.73

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

APTV

11.15%

Automobile Components Industry

Max
22.61%
Q3
12.61%
Median
8.05%
Q1
4.99%
Min
-4.24%

APTV’s Return on Equity of 11.15% is on par with the norm for the Automobile Components industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

CCL

27.27%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
83.01%
Q3
39.51%
Median
17.38%
Q1
5.32%
Min
-45.92%

CCL’s Return on Equity of 27.27% is on par with the norm for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

APTV vs. CCL: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Automobile Components and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

APTV

5.12%

Automobile Components Industry

Max
14.35%
Q3
7.20%
Median
5.37%
Q1
2.20%
Min
-3.89%

APTV’s Net Profit Margin of 5.12% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Automobile Components industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

CCL

9.72%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
26.45%
Q3
14.67%
Median
8.69%
Q1
3.34%
Min
-11.30%

CCL’s Net Profit Margin of 9.72% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

APTV vs. CCL: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Automobile Components and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

APTV

6.35%

Automobile Components Industry

Max
18.98%
Q3
10.24%
Median
7.27%
Q1
4.13%
Min
0.23%

APTV’s Operating Profit Margin of 6.35% is around the midpoint for the Automobile Components industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

CCL

15.19%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
38.76%
Q3
21.15%
Median
14.20%
Q1
6.43%
Min
-14.56%

CCL’s Operating Profit Margin of 15.19% is around the midpoint for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

APTV vs. CCL: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Automobile Components and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolAPTVCCL
Return on Equity (TTM)11.15%27.27%
Return on Assets (TTM)4.25%5.09%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)5.12%9.72%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)6.35%15.19%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)19.11%53.90%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

APTV

1.76

Automobile Components Industry

Max
4.06
Q3
2.51
Median
1.80
Q1
1.47
Min
0.79

APTV’s Current Ratio of 1.76 aligns with the median group of the Automobile Components industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

CCL

0.34

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
2.68
Q3
1.62
Median
1.11
Q1
0.74
Min
0.19

CCL’s Current Ratio of 0.34 falls into the lower quartile for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

APTV vs. CCL: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Automobile Components and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

APTV

0.80

Automobile Components Industry

Max
1.25
Q3
0.63
Median
0.37
Q1
0.18
Min
0.00

APTV’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Automobile Components industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.80. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

CCL

2.72

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
9.88
Q3
4.54
Median
1.52
Q1
0.27
Min
0.00

CCL’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 2.72 is typical for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

APTV vs. CCL: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Automobile Components and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

APTV

8.43

Automobile Components Industry

Max
88.53
Q3
38.84
Median
11.36
Q1
5.08
Min
-21.51

APTV’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 8.43 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Automobile Components industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

CCL

2.15

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
26.88
Q3
11.95
Median
3.87
Q1
1.19
Min
-11.84

CCL’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 2.15 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

APTV vs. CCL: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Automobile Components and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolAPTVCCL
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.760.34
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.220.21
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.802.72
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)8.432.15

Growth

Revenue Growth

APTV vs. CCL: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

APTV vs. CCL: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

APTV

0.00%

Automobile Components Industry

Max
6.03%
Q3
3.38%
Median
2.62%
Q1
1.38%
Min
0.00%

APTV currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

CCL

0.00%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
5.88%
Q3
2.37%
Median
0.68%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

CCL currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

APTV vs. CCL: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Automobile Components and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

APTV

0.00%

Automobile Components Industry

Max
95.56%
Q3
55.95%
Median
37.10%
Q1
27.90%
Min
0.00%

APTV has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

CCL

0.00%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
127.31%
Q3
56.79%
Median
19.58%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

CCL has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

APTV vs. CCL: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Automobile Components and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolAPTVCCL
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

APTV

16.15

Automobile Components Industry

Max
26.62
Q3
17.42
Median
13.22
Q1
11.14
Min
2.52

APTV’s P/E Ratio of 16.15 is within the middle range for the Automobile Components industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

CCL

15.10

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
59.44
Q3
33.98
Median
22.25
Q1
15.53
Min
7.61

In the lower quartile for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, CCL’s P/E Ratio of 15.10 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

APTV vs. CCL: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Automobile Components and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

APTV

0.83

Automobile Components Industry

Max
1.81
Q3
0.97
Median
0.71
Q1
0.38
Min
0.08

APTV’s P/S Ratio of 0.83 aligns with the market consensus for the Automobile Components industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

CCL

1.47

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
7.74
Q3
3.88
Median
2.05
Q1
1.19
Min
0.17

CCL’s P/S Ratio of 1.47 aligns with the market consensus for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

APTV vs. CCL: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Automobile Components and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

APTV

1.53

Automobile Components Industry

Max
2.49
Q3
1.49
Median
0.93
Q1
0.78
Min
0.40

APTV’s P/B Ratio of 1.53 is in the upper tier for the Automobile Components industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

CCL

3.05

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
20.90
Q3
9.78
Median
4.29
Q1
2.22
Min
0.47

CCL’s P/B Ratio of 3.05 is within the conventional range for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

APTV vs. CCL: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Automobile Components and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolAPTVCCL
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)16.1515.10
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)0.831.47
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)1.533.05
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)9.8713.58