Seek Returns logo

APP vs. ZM: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at APP and ZM, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolAPPZM
Company NameAppLovin CorporationZoom Communications Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorInformation TechnologyInformation Technology
GICS IndustrySoftwareSoftware
Market Capitalization230.94 billion USD24.23 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNasdaqGS
Listing DateApril 15, 2021April 18, 2019
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of APP and ZM by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

APP vs. ZM: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolAPPZM
5-Day Price Return-4.16%-3.16%
13-Week Price Return99.85%3.03%
26-Week Price Return157.67%9.75%
52-Week Price Return419.76%19.75%
Month-to-Date Return-4.98%-1.87%
Year-to-Date Return110.84%-0.80%
10-Day Avg. Volume7.08M2.46M
3-Month Avg. Volume6.83M3.16M
3-Month Volatility53.12%34.83%
Beta2.580.82

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

APP

257.74%

Software Industry

Max
66.28%
Q3
21.28%
Median
9.33%
Q1
-8.77%
Min
-48.16%

APP’s Return on Equity of 257.74% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Software industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

ZM

13.40%

Software Industry

Max
66.28%
Q3
21.28%
Median
9.33%
Q1
-8.77%
Min
-48.16%

ZM’s Return on Equity of 13.40% is on par with the norm for the Software industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

APP vs. ZM: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against the Software industry benchmark.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

APP

45.72%

Software Industry

Max
51.92%
Q3
19.23%
Median
6.98%
Q1
-7.14%
Min
-41.00%

A Net Profit Margin of 45.72% places APP in the upper quartile for the Software industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

ZM

24.99%

Software Industry

Max
51.92%
Q3
19.23%
Median
6.98%
Q1
-7.14%
Min
-41.00%

A Net Profit Margin of 24.99% places ZM in the upper quartile for the Software industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

APP vs. ZM: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against the Software industry benchmark.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

APP

52.02%

Software Industry

Max
60.40%
Q3
21.25%
Median
9.90%
Q1
-4.97%
Min
-43.50%

An Operating Profit Margin of 52.02% places APP in the upper quartile for the Software industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

ZM

20.43%

Software Industry

Max
60.40%
Q3
21.25%
Median
9.90%
Q1
-4.97%
Min
-43.50%

ZM’s Operating Profit Margin of 20.43% is around the midpoint for the Software industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

APP vs. ZM: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against the Software industry benchmark.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolAPPZM
Return on Equity (TTM)257.74%13.40%
Return on Assets (TTM)42.29%10.88%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)45.72%24.99%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)52.02%20.43%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)80.87%76.38%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

APP

2.74

Software Industry

Max
4.29
Q3
2.37
Median
1.40
Q1
1.03
Min
0.25

APP’s Current Ratio of 2.74 is in the upper quartile for the Software industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

ZM

4.45

Software Industry

Max
4.29
Q3
2.37
Median
1.40
Q1
1.03
Min
0.25

ZM’s Current Ratio of 4.45 is exceptionally high, placing it well outside the typical range for the Software industry. This indicates a very strong liquidity position, though such a high ratio may also suggest that the company is not using its assets efficiently to generate profits.

APP vs. ZM: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against the Software industry benchmark.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

APP

3.01

Software Industry

Max
2.16
Q3
0.86
Median
0.31
Q1
0.00
Min
0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 3.01, APP operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Software industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

ZM

0.00

Software Industry

Max
2.16
Q3
0.86
Median
0.31
Q1
0.00
Min
0.00

ZM’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.00 is typical for the Software industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

APP vs. ZM: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against the Software industry benchmark.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

APP

6.44

Software Industry

Max
89.65
Q3
32.64
Median
1.00
Q1
-9.84
Min
-71.23

APP’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 6.44 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Software industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

ZM

7.63

Software Industry

Max
89.65
Q3
32.64
Median
1.00
Q1
-9.84
Min
-71.23

ZM’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 7.63 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Software industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

APP vs. ZM: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against the Software industry benchmark.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolAPPZM
Current Ratio (MRQ)2.744.45
Quick Ratio (MRQ)2.544.36
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)3.010.00
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)6.447.63

Growth

Revenue Growth

APP vs. ZM: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

APP vs. ZM: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

APP

0.00%

Software Industry

Max
0.22%
Q3
0.11%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

APP currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

ZM

0.00%

Software Industry

Max
0.22%
Q3
0.11%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

ZM currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

APP vs. ZM: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against the Software industry benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

APP

0.00%

Software Industry

Max
3.29%
Q3
2.41%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

APP has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

ZM

0.00%

Software Industry

Max
3.29%
Q3
2.41%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

ZM has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

APP vs. ZM: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against the Software industry benchmark.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolAPPZM
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

APP

95.06

Software Industry

Max
145.74
Q3
94.88
Median
45.35
Q1
26.66
Min
8.80

A P/E Ratio of 95.06 places APP in the upper quartile for the Software industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

ZM

20.72

Software Industry

Max
145.74
Q3
94.88
Median
45.35
Q1
26.66
Min
8.80

In the lower quartile for the Software industry, ZM’s P/E Ratio of 20.72 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

APP vs. ZM: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against the Software industry benchmark.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

APP

43.46

Software Industry

Max
25.67
Q3
13.68
Median
8.28
Q1
4.95
Min
0.90

With a P/S Ratio of 43.46, APP trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Software industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

ZM

5.18

Software Industry

Max
25.67
Q3
13.68
Median
8.28
Q1
4.95
Min
0.90

ZM’s P/S Ratio of 5.18 aligns with the market consensus for the Software industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

APP vs. ZM: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against the Software industry benchmark.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

APP

101.50

Software Industry

Max
30.67
Q3
14.92
Median
8.52
Q1
3.89
Min
0.38

At 101.50, APP’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Software industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

ZM

2.50

Software Industry

Max
30.67
Q3
14.92
Median
8.52
Q1
3.89
Min
0.38

ZM’s P/B Ratio of 2.50 is in the lower quartile for the Software industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

APP vs. ZM: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against the Software industry benchmark.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolAPPZM
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)95.0620.72
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)43.465.18
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)101.502.50
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)79.7713.34