APP vs. UNH: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
UpdatedHere’s a clear look at APP and UNH, comparing key factors like performance, valuation metrics, dividends, and financial strength. It’s built for investors or anyone curious to see how these two stocks match up.
Company Overview
UNH towers over APP with a market cap of 274.85 billion USD, roughly 2.27 times the 121.26 billion USD of its peer.
APP rides a wilder wave with a beta of 2.39, hinting at bigger swings than UNH’s steadier 0.57.
| Symbol | APP | UNH |
|---|---|---|
| Company Name | AppLovin Corporation | UnitedHealth Group Incorporated |
| Country | US | US |
| Sector | Technology | Healthcare |
| Industry | Software - Application | Medical - Healthcare Plans |
| CEO | Mr. Adam Arash Foroughi | Mr. Stephen J. Hemsley |
| Price | 358.35 USD | 302.98 USD |
| Market Cap | 121.26 billion USD | 274.85 billion USD |
| Beta | 2.392 | 0.571 |
| Exchange | NASDAQ | NYSE |
| IPO Date | April 15, 2021 | October 17, 1984 |
| ADR | No | No |
Performance Comparison
This chart compares the performance of APP and UNH over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).
Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.
Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Valuation Metrics Comparison
For a detailed comparison of valuation metrics between APP and UNH, please refer to the table below.
| Symbol | APP | UNH |
|---|---|---|
| Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM) | 63.43 | 12.58 |
| Forward PEG Ratio (TTM) | 2.43 | 0.82 |
| Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM) | 23.61 | 0.67 |
| Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM) | 211.64 | 2.93 |
| Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM) | 47.87 | 11.05 |
| EV-to-EBITDA (TTM) | 47.30 | 10.13 |
| EV-to-Sales (TTM) | 24.23 | 0.80 |
| EV-to-Free Cash Flow (TTM) | 49.12 | 13.09 |
Dividend Comparison
APP pays no dividends, focusing all profits on growth, appealing to capital-gains investors. Meanwhile, UNH’s 2.77% yield rewards shareholders, showing financial confidence while supporting objectives—a contrast to APP’s growth-only approach.
| Symbol | APP | UNH |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.00% | 2.77% |
Financial Strength Metrics Comparison
This section dives into the financial resilience of APP and UNH, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.
- UNH’s current ratio of 0.85 dips below 1, leaving short-term liabilities larger than current assets—a scenario that could hinge on cash flow support. On the other hand, APP at 1.68 has enough assets to handle its obligations.
- APP racks up a D/E of 6.45 over 3.0, leaning hard into debt and flirting with higher risk. Meanwhile, UNH clocks in at 0.86, staying on firmer ground.
| Symbol | APP | UNH |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (TTM) | 1.68 | 0.85 |
| Quick Ratio (TTM) | 1.68 | 0.85 |
| Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM) | 6.45 | 0.86 |
| Debt-to-Assets Ratio (TTM) | 0.65 | 0.26 |
| Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | 7.41 | 16.30 |