APP vs. SNOW: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
UpdatedHere’s a clear look at APP and SNOW, comparing key factors like performance, valuation metrics, dividends, and financial strength. It’s built for investors or anyone curious to see how these two stocks match up.
Company Overview
APP dominates in value with a market cap of 121.26 billion USD, eclipsing SNOW’s 59.76 billion USD by roughly 2.03×.
APP’s beta of 2.39 points to much larger expected swings compared to SNOW’s calmer 1.11, suggesting both higher upside and downside potential.
| Symbol | APP | SNOW |
|---|---|---|
| Company Name | AppLovin Corporation | Snowflake Inc. |
| Country | US | US |
| Sector | Technology | Technology |
| Industry | Software - Application | Software - Application |
| CEO | Mr. Adam Arash Foroughi | Mr. Sridhar Ramaswamy Ph.D. |
| Price | 358.35 USD | 179.12 USD |
| Market Cap | 121.26 billion USD | 59.76 billion USD |
| Beta | 2.39 | 1.11 |
| Exchange | NASDAQ | NYSE |
| IPO Date | April 15, 2021 | September 16, 2020 |
| ADR | No | No |
Performance Comparison
This chart compares the performance of APP and SNOW over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).
Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.
Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Valuation Metrics Comparison
The section examines key financial ratios to assess the valuation of APP and SNOW based on earnings, cash flow, sales, and book value. Pay attention to the following notable points where extreme values stand out.
- SNOW shows a negative P/E of -46.18, highlighting a year of losses, whereas APP at 63.43 trades on solid profitability.
- SNOW shows a negative forward PEG of -1.25, signaling expected earnings contraction, while APP at 2.43 maintains analysts’ projections for stable or improved profits.
| Symbol | APP | SNOW |
|---|---|---|
| Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM) | 63.43 | -46.18 |
| Forward PEG Ratio (TTM) | 2.43 | -1.25 |
| Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM) | 23.61 | 16.48 |
| Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM) | 211.64 | 19.25 |
| Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM) | 47.87 | 66.40 |
| EV-to-EBITDA (TTM) | 47.30 | -45.85 |
| EV-to-Sales (TTM) | 24.23 | 16.50 |
| EV-to-Free Cash Flow (TTM) | 49.12 | 66.46 |
Dividend Comparison
Neither APP nor SNOW currently pays a dividend yield; this often indicates they are reinvesting earnings for growth, prioritizing long-term expansion over immediate cash returns to shareholders.
| Symbol | APP | SNOW |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financial Strength Metrics Comparison
This section dives into the financial resilience of APP and SNOW, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.
- APP is heavily leveraged (debt-to-equity ratio 6.45), which can boost returns but raises risk if borrowing costs climb, while SNOW at 0.87 keeps leverage at a more moderate level.
- APP meets its interest obligations (ratio 7.41). In stark contrast, SNOW’s negative ratio (-1054.32) means its operating earnings (EBIT) don't cover basic operations, let alone interest, signaling serious financial trouble.
| Symbol | APP | SNOW |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (TTM) | 1.68 | 1.78 |
| Quick Ratio (TTM) | 1.68 | 1.78 |
| Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM) | 6.45 | 0.87 |
| Debt-to-Assets Ratio (TTM) | 0.65 | 0.30 |
| Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | 7.41 | -1054.32 |