APP vs. RBLX: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
UpdatedHere’s a clear look at APP and RBLX, comparing key factors like performance, valuation metrics, dividends, and financial strength. It’s built for investors or anyone curious to see how these two stocks match up.
Company Overview
APP dominates in value with a market cap of 121.26 billion USD, eclipsing RBLX’s 55.05 billion USD by roughly 2.20×.
APP’s beta of 2.39 points to much larger expected swings compared to RBLX’s calmer 1.47, suggesting both higher upside and downside potential.
| Symbol | APP | RBLX |
|---|---|---|
| Company Name | AppLovin Corporation | Roblox Corporation |
| Country | US | US |
| Sector | Technology | Technology |
| Industry | Software - Application | Electronic Gaming & Multimedia |
| CEO | Mr. Adam Arash Foroughi | Mr. David Baszucki |
| Price | 358.35 USD | 81.16 USD |
| Market Cap | 121.26 billion USD | 55.05 billion USD |
| Beta | 2.39 | 1.47 |
| Exchange | NASDAQ | NYSE |
| IPO Date | April 15, 2021 | March 10, 2021 |
| ADR | No | No |
Performance Comparison
This chart compares the performance of APP and RBLX over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).
Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.
Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Valuation Metrics Comparison
The section examines key financial ratios to assess the valuation of APP and RBLX based on earnings, cash flow, sales, and book value. Pay attention to the following notable points where extreme values stand out.
- RBLX shows a negative P/E of -61.96, highlighting a year of losses, whereas APP at 63.43 trades on solid profitability.
| Symbol | APP | RBLX |
|---|---|---|
| Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM) | 63.43 | -61.96 |
| Forward PEG Ratio (TTM) | 2.43 | 1.35 |
| Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM) | 23.61 | 14.35 |
| Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM) | 211.64 | 175.46 |
| Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM) | 47.87 | 62.77 |
| EV-to-EBITDA (TTM) | 47.30 | -90.63 |
| EV-to-Sales (TTM) | 24.23 | 14.52 |
| EV-to-Free Cash Flow (TTM) | 49.12 | 63.51 |
Dividend Comparison
Neither APP nor RBLX currently pays a dividend yield; this often indicates they are reinvesting earnings for growth, prioritizing long-term expansion over immediate cash returns to shareholders.
| Symbol | APP | RBLX |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financial Strength Metrics Comparison
This section dives into the financial resilience of APP and RBLX, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.
- APP and RBLX both have debt-to-equity ratios above 3 (6.45 and 5.81), reflecting aggressive use of debt that can amplify gains but also increase vulnerability to rising rates.
- APP meets its interest obligations (ratio 7.41). In stark contrast, RBLX’s negative ratio (-25.09) means its operating earnings (EBIT) don't cover basic operations, let alone interest, signaling serious financial trouble.
| Symbol | APP | RBLX |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (TTM) | 1.68 | 1.02 |
| Quick Ratio (TTM) | 1.68 | 1.02 |
| Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM) | 6.45 | 5.81 |
| Debt-to-Assets Ratio (TTM) | 0.65 | 0.24 |
| Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | 7.41 | -25.09 |