APP vs. QBTS: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
UpdatedHere’s a clear look at APP and QBTS, comparing key factors like performance, valuation metrics, dividends, and financial strength. It’s built for investors or anyone curious to see how these two stocks match up.
Company Overview
APP dwarfs QBTS in market cap, clocking in at 121.26 billion USD—about 27.35 times the 4.43 billion USD of its counterpart.
APP rides a wilder wave with a beta of 2.39, hinting at bigger swings than QBTS’s steadier 0.89.
| Symbol | APP | QBTS |
|---|---|---|
| Company Name | AppLovin Corporation | D-Wave Quantum Inc. |
| Country | US | CA |
| Sector | Technology | Technology |
| Industry | Software - Application | Computer Hardware |
| CEO | Mr. Adam Arash Foroughi | Dr. Alan E. Baratz Ph.D. |
| Price | 358.35 USD | 15.36 USD |
| Market Cap | 121.26 billion USD | 4.43 billion USD |
| Beta | 2.392 | 0.886 |
| Exchange | NASDAQ | NYSE |
| IPO Date | April 15, 2021 | December 11, 2020 |
| ADR | No | No |
Performance Comparison
This chart compares the performance of APP and QBTS over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).
Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.
Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Valuation Metrics Comparison
The section examines key financial ratios to assess the valuation of APP and QBTS based on earnings, cash flow, sales, and book value. Pay attention to the following notable points where extreme values stand out.
- QBTS shows a negative P/E of -33.33, highlighting a year of losses with no net profit generated. Meanwhile, APP at 63.43 has sustained positive earnings, offering a more stable earnings foundation.
- QBTS has a negative Price-to-Free Cash Flow of -84.98, indicating it’s spent more cash than it’s brought in over the past year—a cash flow shortfall that raises questions about its operational sustainability. Meanwhile, APP at 47.87 maintains a positive cash position.
| Symbol | APP | QBTS |
|---|---|---|
| Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM) | 63.43 | -33.33 |
| Forward PEG Ratio (TTM) | 2.43 | 1.25 |
| Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM) | 23.61 | 207.56 |
| Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM) | 211.64 | 21.21 |
| Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM) | 47.87 | -84.98 |
| EV-to-EBITDA (TTM) | 47.30 | -30.97 |
| EV-to-Sales (TTM) | 24.23 | 193.69 |
| EV-to-Free Cash Flow (TTM) | 49.12 | -79.30 |
Dividend Comparison
Neither APP nor QBTS pays dividends, suggesting both reinvest all profits into growth—likely expansion or innovation—favoring long-term value over immediate income.
| Symbol | APP | QBTS |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financial Strength Metrics Comparison
This section dives into the financial resilience of APP and QBTS, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.
- APP racks up a D/E of 6.45 over 3.0, leaning hard into debt and flirting with higher risk. Meanwhile, QBTS clocks in at 0.04, staying on firmer ground.
- QBTS’s -28.05 sits under 1.5, where earnings hug interest costs too closely—a squeeze if income dips. Meanwhile, APP at 7.41 has room to breathe.
| Symbol | APP | QBTS |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (TTM) | 1.68 | 20.73 |
| Quick Ratio (TTM) | 1.68 | 20.61 |
| Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM) | 6.45 | 0.04 |
| Debt-to-Assets Ratio (TTM) | 0.65 | 0.02 |
| Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | 7.41 | -28.05 |